Anonymous
06 November 2011 at 08:29
a public charitable trust permanent employee has been suspended in karnataka. as per act the trust is covered under shops and establishment act of karnataka. now the period of supension is more than 200 days and management is giving only 50% salary.pl clarify :
1. is employee is eligible for full salary after nintey days of suspensio.
2. enquiry has been closed but no decision taken and employee not informed.can he approach high court for reinstatement.
3. the notice and chargesheet have been issued under education act,where as employee comes under shops and establishment act.
what are remidies available to employee and are there any similar case references
Anonymous
06 November 2011 at 07:55
sir...on behalf of my friend.
my friend is a primary teacher, currently working in birbhum, west-bengal. he is serving from july of last year, its been one and half year of his service. now he want about 3 years of leave, as study leave without any pay. he ask this query to the chairman of the school council,but did not get any way out.he has been told to resign from service if he want study leave.and told that the govt has been changed ,therefore the existing rule has been changed. he is totally confused, he does not want to resign but to seek 3 years of study leave.please provide a way out. how to get the leave legally . thank you.
NAYAK MAFATLAL GORDHANDAS
05 November 2011 at 23:26
Sir, my friend was cought red handed by ACB and after that Bank Management suspended him and issued him chargesheet and punished him to lower scale.
After that Hon. court sentenced him for five years. He got bail from High Court of Gujarat. He was in prision for 20 days. After getting bail he was released from Jail. He resume his duty. Bank has suspend him. after some time he is issued show cause notice by the bank management why he should not dismissed from Bank service.
Sir, in this situation what to do. High Court has admitted his appeal against lower court's order i.e. imprisionment of 6 years, it is pending for disposal in high court.
Please guide me.
Thanks a lot
MG NAYAK
Officer
DENA BANK
NAYAK MAFATLAL GORDHANDAS
05 November 2011 at 23:15
Sir, I was under bias/prejudice minded suspension from 25/11/2009 to 06/05/2011.
After revocation of suspension,Bank Management has not relesed the salary of suspension period. I am officer in DenaBank.Bank Management kept inventory in my ID during suspension.In bank, it remains general instruction in the transfer order that ID of transfered employee must be deleted immdiately after relieve from office.Six months passed after revocation of my suspension but Bank Management has not taken any decesion in my case.
Please suggest me the remedies as well as advice.
Thanks a lot.
MG NAYAK
Officer
Dena Bank
Anonymous
04 November 2011 at 17:45
i am working in XYZ Ltd which is a media & publishing co. but infact my on roll appointment as per my appointment letter is ABC Pvt Ltd which is a man power recruitment company (infact its a dummy company)..
Now i have three questions in mind
1] whether i am considered as employee of ABC Pvt ltd or XYZ Ltd?
2] Now i heard that wage board is going to enhance salary of non journalist, whether i would b entitled for that?
3] Now our management has started new appointments based on entering "service agreement" and avoiding PF/ESI etc.. are they lawfully avoiding PF/esi or other benefits to new employees?
Thanq Sir..
Can u please some more explain Que.No.2.. i saw in newspaper wage board has notified for enhancement of salary for working and non working jounalist.. can i get that benefit?
jolly
04 November 2011 at 15:26
If a person signs a bond and subsequently leaves the job before the completion of the stipulated time, on account of being maltreatment. Is he supposed to pay the amount and how can he escape the liability.
Ramakrishna Kurup
04 November 2011 at 12:48
One manager retired from a unit running under Kerala Cooperative Societies Act.The management is not disbursing leave surrender amount saying that it is retirement benefit and it could be given only after the copletion of Statutory Audit and approval of audit by the general body.Leave surreder amount when encashed in every year is given . But now after retirement when the amount was demanded the management is saying the above reason.
My question is leave surrender value a retirement benefit
Prabhakar
04 November 2011 at 12:01
sir please tell how long does it take to update judgement details of madurai bench in website. The case was disposed on 21st october
Anonymous
03 November 2011 at 16:55
Dear Sir, kindly clarify. A constable was appointed in 1984 in Tamilnadu police. He came on deputation to NLC as Vigilance Constable on 15.06.1987. Actually, he was on deputation from 1987 to 1995 as Vigilance Constable. During August 1995, he was absorbed in NLC with retrospective effect w.e.f.15.06.1987 as Head Constable. (This order shows without deputation period i.e.date of joining in NLC, without even a single day service in NLC, he was considered for promotion from Constable to Head Constable).
Q.1.Whether Retrospective absorption is permissible or not.
Q.2. Whether any person can be absorbed without deputation period?
Q.3. While considering his promotion, Parent dept. approval is necessary or not?
Q.4. In NLC Time Bound Promotion from one category to another category is 4 years. His absorption letter Dt.11.08.1995. Due to Retrospective Absorption, he was considered for promotion from Constable to Head Constable Gr.II, Head Constable Gr.I and Asst. Vigilance Inspector (As on 01.01.1996) (within 4 months i.e. 11.08.1995 to 01.01.1996) three promotions given. Whether the order passed by NLC is right or wrong?
Q.5. During deputation from 1987 to 1995 Rent free Quarters allotted to him. Due to Retrospective absorption(15.06.1987), Is he eligible for rent free quarters from 1987 to 1995 without deputation?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Promotion denied
sir
The judgement delivered by High court, delhi reads as follows:
.... Direction is issued to the respondent to reconsider the case of the petitioner by holding review DPC and if found suitable for promotion, the petitioner be accorded promotion from 1.7.98. we are informed that the petitioner was subsequently given promotion w.e.f.1.7.2001, he shall be given arrears on repromoted post from 1.7.98 to 30.6.2001 and shall also be entitled to consequential benefits of seniority and promotions etc.
The department called me to appear before the Reveiw assessment board 1998 to brief my work report and not to appear for interview/assessment. I appeared before the review board on 27.9.11
the recommendation of the Review Assessment Board 1998 has come and the recommendation is "not yet fit" for promotion.
The review assessment board went beyond its jurisdiction and overlooking the office letter assessed me and gave its recommendation.
Is there any hope left in this case
in light of the following rules .
I may add i have received two promotions one in the year 2001 and another in 2007. both have to be shifted back from 1998 and other on 2003.
should i give representation to the department or directly file contempt of court. has the review assessment board done wrong or not.