Anonymous
04 January 2012 at 11:09
An employee having a salary more than Rs. 6500 per month,has been getting PF deducted.
Now,he wants to opt for non-deduction of PF since his salary is more than Rs. 6500 per month.
Can he execise the option for non-deduction of PF from his salary, and withdraw the balance of PF to his account?
pranith reddy
04 January 2012 at 08:54
Dear Experts,
May I know current Minimum wages to be paid for workers of all categories (skilled , semi skilled & unskilled) working in Pharma industry in andhra pradesh, India.
Thanking You in Advance,
Regards,
Praneeth Reddy
Krishnan
04 January 2012 at 01:04
1. I resigned from ONGC in October 2009 by serving a notice period of 1 month perfectly in line with the terms of my appointment in ONGC read with the applicability provisions ofONGC Service Rules 1995.
2. My terms of appointment in ONGC mentions that terms other than the notice period and four other conditions will be governed by rules and regulations in force from time to time.
3. Applicability provisions of ONGC Service Rules 1995 states that nothing in these rules shall operate to deprive any employee any right or privilege he is entitled to by the terms and conditions of service or any agreement subsisting between him and the Company at the commencement of these rules.
4. Ignoring the points referred above, ONGC imposed a major penalty of removal of service on me for the alleged reason of not serving a notice period of 3 months on resignation from the Company as stipulated under ONGC Service Rules 1995.
5. I have repeatedly appealed to ONGC Management (under the CDA Regulations of ONGC) requesting to accept my resignation considering the above points.
6. ONGC never responded to the violation of my terms of appointment and its Service rules as pointed out in my appeals, but did not entertain my appeals, thereby refusing me my legitimate dues payable on resignation.
7. I have repeatedly appealed on the matter through the Ministry of P&NG and the PMO also. Despite reference from these offices, ONGC continues send the same replies without mentioning anything on the violation of my terms of appointment and the ONGC service Rules 1995 mentioned above.
8. What shall I do now for getting justice at the earliest?
Anonymous
03 January 2012 at 21:02
hi,
i have worked in a public sector organization for 4years and 11 months. its already passed more than 2 year i left the organization.my first query is that whether i am eligible to get gratuity.and 2nd query is can i now applied for gratuity if eligible for gratuity.please give me the solution
Anonymous
03 January 2012 at 19:06
Hi, I am working as a accountant in KPO co. At the time of joining co. has signed some contract with me. In that contract they have also mentioned that i can't leave job suddenly. If you will co. will file case against you in a court. You will have to give leaving notice (resignation letter) to a company before 3 months ago. Now i want to know that if i won't follow this contract term, will co. be liable for filing case against me?
gilgonde
03 January 2012 at 10:41
The pipes are moved from one state to another state under the payment of Central Sales Tax for which the buyer has issued ‘C’ form. The renowned lawyer has opinioned that ince the pipes are manufactured in factory covered under Factories Act and used by the same contractor i.e. the pipe manufacturer for executing pipeline contract in another state, the value only attributable to Lowering, Laying, Jointing, Testing of the pipeline will cover under BOCW Act and hence, the BOCW is not applicable on pipes supplied from one state to another state, even if, they are used by the same manufacturer of pipes for Lowering, Laying, Jointing and Testing contract undertaken though it is indivisible contract. The owner of the contract has accepted this and asked the manufacturer cum contractor to submit an undertaking for any eventuality of the contention being not accepted by BOCW Authorities and the liability to settle the issue remains with the manufacturer cum contractor. They have provided such undertaking to the owner. After some time, owner has obtained another opinion from a Lawyer which is attached herewith as Annexure 2 and hence, the matter is still unresolved. The manufacturer cum contractor has again approached the Lawyer who has given his earlier opinion which is attached herewith as Annexure 1 and according to his conversation, he has reiterated his position and even further added that since this pipeline is forming part of plant and machinery for power generation and being an essential part of the total power generation project, the BOCW Act is not applicable on the same. He being retainer with the owner who was restrained him for giving any such opinion to the manufacturer cum contractor and hence, we seek your advise as follows :
1)Is the BOCW Act is applicable to the pipeline contract?
2)If yes, is it applicable only on the civil portion of the pipeline contract i.e. Lowering, Laying, Jointing, Testing etc.?
3)Is the pipe value from the contract is deductable while arriving at BOCW applicable amount? If yes, kindly give us your valuable inputs on this. If No, what are the reasons?
mcs rammanohar
02 January 2012 at 14:52
As far as govt of tamilnadu employees pay slip for their employees certain office were issued monthly. but some of the offices issuing unauthenticated pay slip. they replied that no such provision is available for authenticated pay slip. If any provision is available for litigate this matter
Ganesh
02 January 2012 at 09:35
Are there any set rules regarding marking attendence of employees through swipe cards. Is calibration of Swipe machines important. Any guidelines regarding securing the input data.
sasankajyoti sharma
01 January 2012 at 20:55
An unskilled labourer had been working under a Contract Firm for a Public Sector Undertaking. He was employed in a Chemical plant of the said Undertaking without proper training.
The Contract Firm which supplied him as man-power to perform the duties of the said Undertaking is a registered firm of the said Undertaking. The P. F. deductions for the said Labourer was regularly made by the said Public Sector Undertaking during his employment.
While on duty the said labourer died at the premises of the said Undertaking. But, after his death both the Contract Firm as well as the said Public Sector Undertaking shows indifference towards any compensation or responsibility demanded by his dependents.
Now, the question is that whether it is the responsibility of the Contract Firm to pay necessary compensation to the dependents or whether the Contract Firm can be demanded for Compensation or not.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Epf act
Sir,
I am working in HR department of an organisation based at Bhilai, we are having PF code at Chattisgargh. We are providing skilled, semiskilled technical manpower to various industries. We have a issue with our client at Rajasthan- we are contributing and deduction Pf and filing up seperate challan for that region at Chattisgarh and submitting the same to the client. But now our client is insisting us to have a new PF Subcode at Rajashthan.Is is compulsory under PF act to have seperate Pf Subcodes for all the (states)/region.