Brief of Case:
One person has to give money to me. He gave a CheQue. But the CheQue bounced from bank due to "insufficient funds". Now I want to file a Criminal Complaint u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
My Question:
1) Can I file a Petition in Court u/s 302 Requesting/Praying Myself and a Junior Advocate to permit both me and the junior Advocate to appear in CheQue Bounce case?
2) Is there any special format or Template available? if so, kindly mention the website name.
Thanks in Advance
Ram
I want to go for hunger strike against police department since favouring the accused and not filing charge sheet. Do I need to take permission from police to go for hunger strike and what section applies.
sir
accused borrowed an amount of Rs 1 lakh from the complainant as introduced by PW3 Complainant's witness.But the complainant filled the cheque for Rs 5 lakh and on dishonour of cheque filed case against accused for 5 lakhs, and complainant and PW3 gave evidence in support of that But the audio conversation record between the accused and PW3 produced and marked by the accused before the court shows that PW3 admit that only 1 lakh was given to the accused.What will be result?
Dear Sir, I was a student in some university and university filled a criminal case on me and some other student with some section like 341, 332, 353, etc now that case has taken back (withdrawn) by state govt. In 2017. So does I will face any problem at the time of appointment of govt. Job or not at all. Edit - taken back means withdrawal.
No order were given by court against me as the case was withdrawn by state govt. In 2017
sir
accused borrowed an amount of Rs 1 lakh from the complainant as introduced by PW3 Complainant's witness.But the complainant filled the cheque for Rs 5 lakh and on dishonour of cheque filed case against accused for 5 lakhs, and complainant and PW3 gave evidence in support of that But the audio conversation record between the accused and PW3 produced and marked by the accused before the court shows that PW3 admit that only 1 lakh was given to the accused.What will be result?
Dear Sir, I was a student in some university and university filled a criminal case on me and some other student with some section like 341, 332, 353, etc now that case has been taken back (withdrawn) by state govt. In 2017. So does I will face any problem at the time of appointment of govt. Job or not at all.
Edit - taken back means withdrawn.
Does a Partner of LLP can be liable for the dishonour of Cheque as same as the Designated Partner.
Dear Respected Experts,
Case History in Brief:
Anitha given a CheQue to house owner Kannan for house rental advance. The cheque was Anitha’s mother bank account. House owner Kannan withdrew the amount. After two years Anitha vacated Kanan’s house. Kannan told Anitha that he given the Amount to his Brother Krishnan because both Kannan & Krishnan partitioned their property. Now the property belongs to Krishnan. Krishnan also ensured Anitha that he will give the amount in 3 month’s time. After 3 months Krishnan given a Cheque to Anitha. When Anitha deposited Krishnan’s cheque, it bounced back due to “insufficient fund”. Now the petitioner is Anitha.
Anitha filed a Complaint u/s Negotiable Instrument Act 138 for Cheque bounce Case.
My Question:
1. Can Complainant-Anitha call Kannan as witness u/s 311 CrPc in cheque bounce case?
2. Can Complainant-Anitha Call her mother as witness u/s 311 CrPc to prove that her mother given the Cheque
to her daughter Anitha for rental Advance?
Thanks in Advance
There was a married man having 2 kids whose wife passed away.
Through mutual friends he contacted me to marry him
I denied to marry him but he asked me to a good friend with him.
When seeing his situation I agreed to marry him
He physically abused me saying that in future he will marry me.
Now when he used me several times he is denying to get married and mentally harassing me to leave him.
I m suffering from a mental trauma due to it that he used me
Discharge of case
Where to file petition of discharge of case. In district court or high court