PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
01 May 2009 at 20:52
IN THE REVISIONAPPLICATION FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE MUDAMAL-HEROHONDA THE ORIGINAL BILL AND THE POLICY IS ATTATCHED BEFORE THE COURT. THE HEROHOND IS TAKEN ON LOAN BY THE APPLICANT .IN THE R.C.BOOK THE NAME OF THE APPLICANT IS THERE BUT IN ANOTHER PAGE IT IS WRITTEN THAT SUBJECT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT AND THE INSTALLMENT OF THE HERO HONDA IS NOT PAID BY THE APPLICANT NOW WHAT I HAVE TO PRODUCE BEFORE THE COURT TO RECOVER THE HONDA
1] R.C. BOOK OR THE N.O.C.OF THE BANK PLS INFORME ME
THANKS IN ADVANCE
d.prabhakar rao
30 April 2009 at 22:39
sir
this happened in october2001.it is alleged that a person working in a nationalised bank was caught by cbi while accepting bribe and he was suspended. later on the case was submitted to cbi special court after enuiry made by cbi police. in the mean time the department called for enquiry. the person went to high court saying that in one case whcih is in the court, two enquiries should not be conducted. the high courtgave direction to cbi court to speed up framed the time. but, the department enquiry was not conducted. later,on, the ,person lost case in the trial court and convicted. after that,without conducting the departmental enquiry , the employer dismissed him from service as per banking regulation act . the accused went to the high court and got stay of the conviction. this happened in the yhear 2003. the employer did not call for department enuiry till then. is there any possibility to get relief or reengaged. plese help him
thank you sir
d.prabhakar rao
30 April 2009 at 20:13
let me know who is the best advocate in ap high court to argue for corruption case and also in supreme court
thank u
d.babu
30 April 2009 at 19:14
one person working in central govt. and lost case in thelower court.and sentenced he went to high court and got stayed the lower court decision. in the meanwhile, he was dismissed from service. nno departmetal enuiry is conducted.under banking regulation act 1949. shall he get employment till the decision of high court. shall he is eligible for going to supreme court after high court how shall he get employment in the mean time what is the proceedure to be followed. please help him
d.prabhakar rao
30 April 2009 at 18:58
one person working in central govt. and lost case in thelower court.and sentenced. he went to high court and got stayed the lower court decision. no departmental enquiry was conducted.in the meanwhile, he was dismissed from service. under banking regulation act 1949. shall he get employment till the decision of high court. shall he is eligible for going to supreme court after high court how shall he get employment in the mean time what is the proceedure to be followed. please help him
d.prabhakar rao
30 April 2009 at 18:55
one person working in central govt. and lost case in thelower court.under anticurrption act. he was sentenced and he went to high court and got stayed the lower court decision. in the meanwhile, he was dismissed from service. under banking regulation act 1949. shall he get employment till the decision of high court. shall he is eligible for going to supreme court after high court how shall he get employment in the mean time what is the proceedure to be followed. please help him
d.prabhakar rao
30 April 2009 at 14:33
one person working in central govt. and lost case in thelower court. he went to high court and got stayed the lower court decision. in the meanwhile, he was dismissed from service. under banking regulation act 1949. shall he get employment till the decision of high court. shall he is eligible for going to supreme court after high court how shall he get employment in the mean time what is the proceedure to be followed. please help him
vijayalaxmi
30 April 2009 at 12:04
Hi,
I came across a female aged 85 years, who is abandoned by her children. She is virtually homeless and is living on road.Her neighbour wants to help her by admitting her in an old aged home. But she does not to take any liablity in future.Please could you answer the following questions which her neighbour came across while admitting her to an old aged home.
1) Can an affidavit stating that on account of any illness, death of the lady, her neighbour and the concerned old aged home is not held liable by anyone, including her children.
2) Can her children be compelled by law to take care of her?
3) Is she entitled for any maintainance from her 2 sons. Also can a unmarried, married or widowed daughter/daughters can be held responsible for maintainance.
4) Can her sons or unmarried, married or widowed daughter/daughters be punished by law for ill-treating their mother.
5)Can a criminal case be registered against her children. If yes, please could you explain the procedure to be followed.
Kamlesh soni
29 April 2009 at 03:34
Respected Expert, I got one case in which my client had stolen some diomond where he works price of 6000.The factory manager had alredy enter the F.I.R.. according to my client he had done this first time and never in past.he further more added that the factory manager reduce the rate of his salary last three month without any suggestion. and it is difficult to survive his family in that salary. and he never left the service because of perticular now in dimond condition.
now please guide me how i protect my client better?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Whether section 340 of Cr.P.C. is applicable to application?
Dear all brothers,
In a pending criminal case of 406 of IPC before a metropolitan court of Mumbai,where no plea was recorded yet and hence,trial was not set in motion in real sense.
During its pendency,a simple application was made before the said court by the complainant i.e registered corporate body and consequent acquittal of accused took place by mutual trust.
Later on, an agent through whom the said criminal complaint was lodged by the said corporate body,filed an application on his own under section 340 of Cr.P.C.against the said corporate body present functionary and the said acquitted accused.
The said application was rightly dismissed by the said trial court but the Sessions Court has overturned the said dismissal order.
In the light of the above,now please let us know as to said section of 340 is applicable to the said application as the said application is not a "document produced or given in EVIDENCE "?
When even plea was not recorded and where was the question of evidence?
We are surprised at the perverse judgment of the Sessions Court,which had not mentioned a single word from the 67 paged written arguments involving historic citations of constitution benches of the apex court of the country of the said respondents.
Kindly throw some light on the aforesaid dismal scenario and any citation or authority,if available,in a similar situation will be highly appreciated.
thanks n regards,
Amar Ranu