harish
05 March 2010 at 19:58
my query is - for example a juvenile of 17 years committed an offence. thereafter he tried by the board under juvenile act.when the decision of board came accused becomes more than 18 years. which means now he is no more juvenile as per the definition of juvenile under the act. now the question arises whether that person can be inflicted with any of the punishments under sec. 15 of the juvenile justice act.
Manish Raj Verma
05 March 2010 at 18:46
R/Sir(s)/Madam(s),
A complaint u/s 138 has been filed against my client, and summoning order has been passed.
But my client is neither having the account in the bank, of which the cheque is involved in the matter, nor he gave that cheque. The account of the cheque is in some other person's name.
what should i do?
whether i should go for revision before D.J.
or
whether i opt to go to High Court U/s. 482 Cr.P.C.
Please guide.
Manish, Advocate, Haridwar.
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 16:55
whether a person can be declared as a p.o. except for the offences as mentioned in sec.82(4)crpc.read with sec.174-a ipc.
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 16:49
whether a juvenile who crossed the age of 18 years during proceedings before the board can be inflicted with any of the punishment under sec. 15 of the juvenile justice act
kanti kumar
05 March 2010 at 16:08
If the accused got released in 498a cases by district court order then what is the procedure and time duration to challenge the order in upper court and which is the next court after district court in which we can challenge the order and please also tell what steps to be taken during the appele if any .
thank you
santosh
05 March 2010 at 15:39
Dear expert,
guide me with your opinion and judgements.
Thanking You
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 14:37
A complaint is filed against me under section 138 stating i bought a sofa set from the opposite party and in consideration i gave a cheque.but i gave a cheque for the purpose of a hand loan taken from the company as i am the employee of that company.on behalf of the opposite a person filed a complaint without stating in the complaint that he is the authorised person to file the complaint but only one director of the company gave the authorisation.the OP has not filed any document in support of the purchase of the sofa and i am not having any document of the loan ?What is the maintainability of the petition?
Pramod Pawar
05 March 2010 at 14:15
A poor farmer X buy a secondhand motorcycle by verifying all documents and it also get transferred to X at RTO abad, mahrastra before one year; today also documents from RTO OFFICE shows vehicle belongs to x.
In the last month finance gang had forcefully taken the vehicle from X when x was on tour with his family at taluka place. police station incharge is not ready for filing FIR as finance gang claims that vehicle is financed by them initially. actually information particulars of vehicle from RTO of todays date shows no finance on vehicle . Also if finance is on vehicle i.e. on motorcycle then how the vehicle get transferred to X .my cury to Hon'ble expert is weather incident is of criminal or civil nature? what to do to file FIR of the incident.
Anonymous
05 March 2010 at 11:05
Sir I have a small query relating to my case.
Accused had a business of supplying goods to 'A'. Accused was given advance money to procure goods and accused gave 'A' a blank cheque as security.
B took the cheque collusively. Filled in the blanks. Cheque bounced. 'B' Complainant after issuing notice filed criminal complaint under section 138.
The complainant (B) only stated that accused opwned him money, and to repay he issue the cheque with figure of amount.
'A' had no transactions as business relation with the complainant (B).
Accused has already been conviction and presently appeal is pending for disposal.
Kindly advice and if possible give some citation / judgement in favour of the Accused (Defence).
Kindly treat this as most URGENT.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
po
my query is that there are specific sections mentioned in sec.82(4)crpc. for example ec.279ipc is not mentioned in sec.82(4).whether an accused u/s279ipc can be declared as po