visu
18 September 2010 at 16:10
Pl. advise what are the consequences..
and the status of a person;
who have given surety (for bail) to a person convicted (u/s 26) as accused in a CBI case.
Is there any special precaution that SURETY to be taken
Pl. advise.. and comment.
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 13:32
Recently there was a news that Maharashtra Govt. is worried about very poor rate of conviction in cases due to PP and want to act against them. This is nothing but yet another hogwash from a corrupt govt. Due to this my case suffering which is pending in MM's 38th Court at Ballard Pier Court since 2005. I now request following clarifications from learned and experienced experts:
1) Can I cross examine the accused persons and if so under what section ?
2) Can I give written statement with documents so that the MM does not play dirty to help accused persons and if so under what section ?
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 12:15
Dear Experts,
My wife filed false 498A complaint 2years back. No FIR till now. We got AB from HC and now on bail. Now she put pressure on the station SI to get my ration card. I said ration card is in my residential address and you have no authority to ask me to give to wife who live in her parents house.
I wanted to file divorce in near future. I think she use it to prove that we are not separated.
Can ration card is used as a evidence in divorce procedure?
Is it advisable to delete her name and daughter's from ration card?
I need all experts advices. Thanking You.
dipankar
18 September 2010 at 10:38
My friend a harijan by caste is a victim of atrocity by forward caste.He tried to lodge an FIR but the case is lying with the DSP for the last 40 days and he has done no enquiry till now.He has also got 4 witness to prove his case.Now what step should he take further?1.Either report the matter to SP.2.Will he be able to lodge an FIR from court vide 156(3)crpc.3 OR lodge a case from court directly without going into complexities of lodging an FIR.4.Should he approach the scheduled caste commission.Dear Experts please remember that he has 4 witness to prove his case and also please specify the time it will take to necessitate action against the guilty in whatever step my friend chooses.
Goutam
18 September 2010 at 00:46
1.From where i can get an application or set proforma under the Right to information act, for filing an application for the inquiry purpose in the public sector.
2.Can i move an application now under RTI ACT 2005 in the bank, regarding the inquiry of my account for the particular time period which is from(1-1-2004 to 1-2-2006).
3.Because there is a dispute arise now for a cheque which is given by me at that time......
M/s. Y-not legal services
17 September 2010 at 17:38
if any one convicted accused committed any offense in prison mean whats the procedure to charge against him? for example: he caused a grievous injury to anybody which one can treated as 307 of i.p.c..
..tom..
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 17:32
Which documents requier to submit to magistrate at the time of release of Suspect under CRPC 169 by IO? Its necessey to IO to inform compaintant before submitt CRPC169 to magistrate?
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 16:22
Is there any provision in the Criminal Procedure Code or High Court Rules that in the eventuality of non availability of local surity in a Section 138 N I Act case personal bond will suffice.
Best Regards
Anonymous
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 15:23
pls reply me ..
i got married on 30.1.2009 at kolkatta,then shifted to bangalore with my husband and in-laws.After 5 months of marriage i filed DV Act at magistrate court.now its on evidence stage.i am staying separate from 01.04.2010 to till date.while my staying with my in-laws and my husband they made my life hell .. they torchered me mentally and physically.on july 2010 my husband filed divorce case on 13(ia)(ib). now my question is whether i can file 498a against them. ????? pls help me
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
prosecution sanction in arms act
For prosecution of an Arms Act case ,sanction of District Magistrate is necessary u/s 39 of the Act. Can sanction of District Magistrate be obtained before pronouncing of the judgment or during trial of the case or before ?