Anonymous
24 October 2010 at 15:53
Contd. From pre page:
Now, I want to claim compensation for (a)illegal detention, (b)deprivation from appearing any interview, (c) keeping my auto to death and non functional at police station till date, as the present bank manager is threatening me to deposit remaining EMI of the bank loan.
What do I do now to claim compensation?
i) can I claim tomorrow before the Magistrate by/without filling additional affidavit or
ii) shall I file fresh money suit for the compensation after the case is disposed off. If so, will there be case of limitation Act, as the case initiated in the year 2000. Please help.
Anonymous
24 October 2010 at 15:41
1. I bought an auto as a loan from a nationalized bank in the year 2000 under Prime Minister Rozgar Yozna (PMRY), keeping all my certificates of educational qualifications as securities.
2. In the year 2001, Bank Manager under personal enmity filed an FIR in the local police station in the pretext of Criminal Breach of Trust that I have sold my Auto to some other person before clearing all EMI dues to the bank.
3. The same day I was arrested, later released on bail. And the Auto was seized by the police, which died a natural death in the police station and still lying as crapes there.
4. The case went on stretching till today, and my certificates returned back only a few months back, after I have already become over aged for any kind of competitive examination.
5. Magistrate is well convinced that I have been victimized. Now the case is set for hearing tomorrow in the court of judicial magistrate.
The said Manager has already been terminated two years back under misappropriation of the public Money.
Anonymous
24 October 2010 at 14:38
Is this DP note valid for cheque bounce under NIA 138 or other Act. Please advice, I landed this amount to my friend as he was shortage of money for purchase of bitumen, my friend invited for partnership in that business but I refused to involve as the entire work was in others name but I helped him by giving financial support in return he gave me a DP Note along with cheque for Rs. 60,000/= now the cheque has bounch notice is also served but no result, if I move to court will this DP Note help me out or it will proof me as illegal money lender (I never lend any money accept to this person) please help
D P NOTE
Date: - 30/08/2010
DIBRUGARH.
I Sri XXXXX, age 38 years, S/o Sri XXXXX, R/o XXXXXXXXXXXX received a sum of Rupees fifty thousand (Rs. 50,000/=) by cheque from Sri YYYYY S/o YYYYYYY R/o mmmmmmmm, for my personal need which I promise to pay on demand the total sum of Rs. 60,000/= (Rupees sixty Thousand) only including interest thereof on or before 08/09/2010.
Revenue of
Rs. 4 is to affix
case
Anonymous
24 October 2010 at 09:22
Our company has sold some goods to a man along with his son and they have in return given an undertaking on pile paper that they will deposit the amount in due time as discussed.
The purchaser has given his address proof (ration card, Elec. bill) on which when we send legal notice it came back with message NOT FOUND , later when we inquired for him then we were shocked to know that person never resided their also the document given as address proof were forged.
CAN WE FILE AN FIR AGAINST THE PARTY, UNDER WHICH SECTION AND WHERE AND WHEN
ravi anu ramraika
23 October 2010 at 19:30
sir, thanks for all members,who advise me, sir,kal mera 138 n.i.act ka cross tha ,as accused maine judge se permisson manga,jo turnt mil gayi aur maine cross kiya, jisse main santust hoo. thanks for all
Anonymous
23 October 2010 at 17:06
Sir,
What it the period for limitation to sue or recover alleged dues by Banks i.e.what is the time limit for recovery of such alleghed dues?
Anonymous
23 October 2010 at 16:47
Section 498 of the IPC "Whoever takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of any other man, form that man, or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person, or conceals or detains with that intent any such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both."
In this section the words "with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person" I am not getting this words. Illicit Intercourse with whom, any person or with the person who takes, entices, conceals or detains or any means any person.
If any married woman left her husband matrimonial home without any reason and subsequently file petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty which is false allegations. In this somebody calling and try to convince to have divorce and helping her to have divorce and forcing and threatening her husband for divorce else ready for bad consequences, dose this case fit for takes u/s 498 against that person? I have proof that the person was calling her frequently for conveying for divorce no recording is available.
"With intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person" is it necessary to prove this in above case?
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
23 October 2010 at 16:29
In NI 138 cheque bounce cases in notice and in complaint whether it is essential to give cheque no as well as bank account no.
1) If bank account no is not given and only cheque no is given , will it be fatal for the complaint.
2) If cheque no is not given and bank account no with name of the bank is given , is it sufficient.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
23 October 2010 at 16:27
In NI 138 cheque bounce cases in notice and in complaint whether it is essential to give cheque no as well as bank account no.
1) If bank account no is not given and only cheque no is given , will it be fatal for the complaint.
2) If cheque no is not given and bank account no with name of the bank is given , is it sufficient.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Illegal detention
sorry my question has been upside down.
............But sirs, wouldn't limitation apply, if I file fresh suit now?