Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   05 November 2010 at 16:04

Case under Sec.138 of NI Act

In one case, before the Hon'ble Metropolitan Magistrate (HMM)the advocate for the accused appreared before the bench with a DD for for the final payment against the bounced cheque (in earlier two hearings part amounts were paid). The HMM questioned as per latest SC Norms whether the advocate of accused is depositing 10% valued of the bounced cheque. The adv.for the accused said he is not asking for closing the case as his clients are yet to pay interest for the cheque value as per the agreement, and once the complainant confirms his clients would pay interest also.HMM agreed. But the advocate of complainant said so far the accused have nevered appeared before the HMM. Immediately the HMM ordered all the accused in the case to be present beforethe court on the next hearingdate. MY APPREHENSION AND DOUBT IS IN CASE ANY OF THE ACCUSED FAILS TO PRESENT BEFORE THE HMM DURING NEXT HEARING WHETHER ANY CHANCE OF HMM TREATING NON-APPEARANCE OF ACCUSED AS CONTEMPT OF COURT AND POSSIBILITY OF ISSUING FRESH WARRANTS/SUMMONS. THE COMPLAINANT UNOFFICIALLY SAYS THEY WOULD NOT PRESS AND RAISE THE ISSUE OF NON-APPREANCE OF THE ACCUSED. MY FEELING IS THE HMM MAY TREAT NON APPEARANCE OFTHE ACCUSED AS CONTEMPT OF COURT. PLEASE GIVE YOUR OPINION

Anonymous   05 November 2010 at 14:41

website

Any website for legal question and answer on law topic?

Anonymous   05 November 2010 at 12:49

limitataion

Respected sir. what is the limitation of file a application on sec. 125 crpc after divorce?

Anonymous   04 November 2010 at 22:41

Appellant jurisdiction

What is the appellant jurisdiction in case of acquittal of accused in N.I. Act cases. Whether it can be filed in the concerned District Court or High Court. Please provide provisions.

s saravanan   04 November 2010 at 22:13

cheque case- duration of notice period

cheque collection date-27-10-2003
cheque return memo of the opponent party 28/10/03.
But i received the cheque from my bank on 07/11/03.
in the above situation what is the final date of issuing the notice with in limitation,

manish   04 November 2010 at 19:37

revision in session court

respected sir
i am advocate for respondent, agrieved person filed application u/s. domestice violence act, the honble court awarded interim maintenance of rs 4000/-, she again filed application for recovering expenses of child education rs. 72000/- said application was rejected by m.m court on the ground that there is no provision for such application, against said order she filed revision in session, pls guide me that there is need of any reply need for revision or is the matter of only arguments, what should i argue is there in case law in such matter pls help me.

Anonymous   04 November 2010 at 19:06

compensation to victims

term paper on compensation to victims. chapters are...... 1. introduction 2.development of the concept of compensation to victims. 3.legislative provisions. 4.role of judiciary. 5.conclusions and suggestations

Anonymous   04 November 2010 at 16:18

Accused deth

Respected sir,

My complainant is a Co - oprative bank and this accused took a loan and issued a cheque as a security and after that accused became defolt and bank filed complaint against him 138 ni act during trial accused died so what i do as a complainant lawyer?

Bank has a public money and if case is widrawal so it too much loss.

So any citation regarding to legal hair is responsible for that pls give me advise.

Anonymous   04 November 2010 at 12:12

Bail application in High Court after Chargesheet

Dear Sir,

Below IPC are on my dad 420,511,471,466,467 and 468.

After chargeshhet we submit the application for bail in Gujarat HighCourt.
My Query is after chargeshhet session has rejected bail. now if High Court also rejects what is next?

1) Can we reapply in High Court after 30 days?
2)Or we have go to Supreme Court?

Please advise.

Regards,
Pari

Anonymous   03 November 2010 at 22:18

sec.125 of crpc

wheter the attachment of immovable property if possible in a maintanace case. if any supporting decisions?