Anonymous
14 December 2010 at 11:30
Recently i asked a question about a ritual to a hindu priest about hindu marriage and many people from a marriage hall took away my documents like pan card, atm card, sim card etc for asking that question. Now i dont know the adress of these people. when i call the number of the person whom the marriage hall owner gave, he says he does not know about all these things. How can i get back my documents? pls help (I am a Christian)
Anonymous
14 December 2010 at 09:55
if the name oesnot figure in the figure in the f.i.r can he be arrested without lodging the name.
Anonymous
14 December 2010 at 09:50
There is one case filed against me last year on august 22nd 2010 that i have sent obscene sms to a gentleman(who is a known person to me) from a website. i was arrested on 22nd september evening and on 23rd morning at 10 i was released on bail. case is registered under the section U/s 292. recently police have filed charge sheet saying that they did not get information from my mobile operator airtel which suggests that i have sent any sms to any one(leaving apart obscenity).
I applied in high court to quash the case as there is no evidence for that. I am told by my lawyer that this week my quashing decision will be made in the court. Can you please let me know if the high court does not quash it, will they give judgement for imprisonment to me by any chance ?
1)Why a person whose name has come in the GD of police as PW, declared hostile by the prosecution if he admits before the court that he has never given any statement to the police?
2)Even if he admits that whatever statement he gave before the police was under threat, duress or greed and he denies everything in the court, would he be still declared hostile by the prosecution?
3)And if he denies in the court, his previous statement before the police, will he be considered to save the accused and his denial would be construed as null and void and the accused would be convicted on his statement to the police?
Which of the statement of PW's is admissible in evidence?Is it the statement recorded u/s 161 CrPC by Police or which he narrates before the court or which is filtered after cross-examination by the defence lawyer?
My wife & son were charged for 364/302/201IPC but convicted u/s 364IPC to 7 Yrs RI& are on bail pending appeal.The judge relied on the improvised statement of PW.Ironically original improvised statement found missing from the file and he convicted them on statement on carbon copy.Is it legal in law? as I have been made to understand that Session Judges in India have extra-ordinary powers and they can not be questioned on thier way of judgment wherein I want to submit a petition to the Hon'ble Chief Justice,Allahabad High Court.(U.P.)
Kindly advise: a)Is judge was within his power to convict on the statement on carbon copy when original is missing.b)Can he prepare the Replica of original with consent of PP and our defence lawyer. and if so, would this not be forgery?c)Can I raise this issue before Hon'ble Chief Justice.Allahabad High Court?
kiran
13 December 2010 at 20:23
Hi Everyone,
I gave my small hotel to manage to a guy for a period of 2 months.. because.. I had to leave to some other town. We had no legal agreement whatsoever. When I asked him to leave.. he said he will drag me to court. Somehow I vacated him and took over my position.
And later he filed a legal complaint for injunction, which is on trial.
Now, he is threatening that he will file SC/ST case against me.. if I do not let him work as a manager for few more months.
Can you please advise me.. how to avoid from being charged by a false SC/ST case.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran.
anjali
13 December 2010 at 20:20
i had taken not to arrest from sessions court, on submitting the order to the IO he had arrested and released me on PR BOND from police station in writ against state, there is not any stay from high court for further proceeding and the charge sheet is also filled in magistrate court. should i go for regular bail before Metropolitan Magistrate?
a criminal case four accused in this matter one is married daughter she is pregnant also about seven month living in sasural .is it possible anticipatory bailed out.can you suggest me.
MY NAME IS NOT IN FIR LODGED BY CBI
CBI LODGES AN FIR ON THE BASISI OF PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE AND LODGES F.I.R. IN THE NAME OF A AND B. WHEREAS THE COMPLAINANT MENTIONS THE NAME OF A AND C IN HIS COMPLAINT.(SINCE C HAS NEVER MET HIM NOR SPOKEN TO HIM NOR SEEN HIM HE SIMPLY WRITES THE NAME OF C ) SO THE NAME C WAS NOT LODGED IN THE F I R. BUT CBI ARRESTS A,B AND C. TO BE CLEAR TILL THE TIME OF LODGING F I R C WAS NOT IN THE PICTURE LATR ON C WAS MADE A SCAPEGOAT. CAN C BE ARRESTED WITHOUT NAME IN THE F.I.R.