Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vishal Shantaram Kamble   20 January 2011 at 18:44

IPC 324

If ipc 324 is applied on some one and bail is done can it be change to 326 if case is again done

A.P.Rajagopal   20 January 2011 at 17:43

sec 138 ni act can be replaced by 420 of ipc

sir,

my client presented a cheque of his customer for collection which has been bounced by him and i failed to send a notice within 30 days and even its past 3 months. shall he can be sued for breach of trust,forgery,cheating and fraud under ipc. is there any authority available for it. may kly be advised on this .

tks

raj

Anonymous   20 January 2011 at 16:38

307 ipc

the persons are under 307 from last 7 months in jail & oppositions also under 302 ipc.I want to clarify any point How these persons under 307 ipc are getting to bail. These Persons are well educated & also permanent employee in private comp.Earlier HC REJECTED bail on reasons of this is counter case.

Please guide me.

Anonymous   20 January 2011 at 14:51

annticipatory bail

Sir,
After obtaining the anticipatory bail, before whom should the accused surrender to obtain a regular bail? the court or before the I.O.Is it correct to lay a condition in the anticipatory bail that the accused shall get a formal arrest before the I.O within 15days from the date of receipt of the order. Kindly advise,sir

Anonymous   20 January 2011 at 13:20

Whose burden to submit proof of land in court?

Dear Experts,
1)If anyone go to court for claiming share in property without original document? 2)Whose burden to submit the document proof to court?
2)Can the court asks the particular area sub-registrar to submit opposite party land details?

Anonymous   19 January 2011 at 20:53

section 256 of Cr P C

i am accused in case u/s 138. the power of attorney filed the case. power of attorney was not attended the court on any dates of hearing from last nine years. i filled more than 40 applications u/s 256 of Cr. P. C for dissmise the case, but court every application kept for hearing and once court dissmised all the application by saying not to take hard step for dissmising the complaint and diismised all 20 application by passing one order and kept xerox copy of the order in other applications. case transfered to fast trak court in that court also complainant not apperared. i againr file application u/s 256 of Cr P C. againe court kept that application for hearingand issued notice to the complainant. on next date of hearing againre complainant was not present. no advocate present for complainant. matter was called out. i filled one againe application u/s 256 of cr p c for dissmise the case but court once againe kept that application for hearing. so please help me out now what leagality is shoud take in this matter

best regards

vipul vora

Sumir   19 January 2011 at 19:11

mental harrasement,

Under which IPC , can a person be booked for mental harrasement?

Anonymous   19 January 2011 at 18:58

preventive action

If some has threat to his life, how can one take preventive action..

A.P.Rajagopal   19 January 2011 at 18:09

sec 317

sir

In a criminal case which is pending before cjm among 3 accused, 2 accused never turns up to the court and everytime they file 317 petition and they are very well present in the city with full health condition and we want them to present for every hearing. we are advocates for defacto complainant. how to proceed to make their presence compulsory

may pls be guided

tks n rgs

apr

Anonymous   19 January 2011 at 17:29

Sec 107/151 Crpc

My wife lodged a complaint against me on the basis of which action u/s 107/151 Crpc was initiated by the police.
I am presently on bail. However around one month after complaint was filed the dispute between both of us was resolved and a compromise was arrived at in CAW Cell.
My question to you is that can the proceedings u/s 107/151 already initiated can be stopped/closed by myself or by my wife who was the complainant or will the proceedings continue ?