Anonymous
22 January 2011 at 17:02
hi sir,
Intially i gave a case of mine to a lawyer. he is not doing anythig for me other than giving me wrong dates for court attending. now i want to shift to another lawyer. but for that do i have to get mandatorily No Objection certificate from first lawyer.???
if my first lawyer does not agree to give no objection certificate how should i approach. can some one guide me on this ?
Anonymous
22 January 2011 at 11:22
A Mr.Shrikant Shete & his company -Training 8m Corporate Technologies has over the past two years or more cheating people by taking considerable money from hopeful aspirants promising them jobs in the overseas market - Singapore/Australia/New Zealand, and later not being contactable. He has his wife fronting him here in Mumbai, while he claims to be traveling internationally.
I have been a victim. Don't know if I can get my monies back, but definitely want to do my best to see that he is caught and punished for his deeds. Atleast I can save other people from getting similarly duped.I have records of all the emails/sms exchanged during the one year period that I have been following up on my candidature. I was promised a job within 14-16 weeks of registration & it now over 13 months. Now it is becoming a crusade for me!. It will be a shame if people like him are not brought to justice - he is obviously hoping that due to the corruption & the way legal system is in our country, he can get away with this kind of modus operandi.Most people will follow upto a point & then probably give up. I would not like to ...So could I get some expert advice on how I can bring this scamster to brook, ensure justice for those who have been duped & prevent more people form a similar fate ?
Anonymous
22 January 2011 at 10:50
We have suppiled some goods against 30 days PDC to contractor which bounced when presented to bank. We understand that the said contractor is cheat by nature and the PDC issued by them to vendors keep bouncing. Due to this we went to police station for registering a FIR but the inspector of police did not register the FIR saying it is a civil matter. Pl. advice how we can make police act on our complaint and register the FIR?
Satish Gotiram PATIL
22 January 2011 at 09:33
pL. gUIDE ME any points to be taken for bail & fresh ground for this 307 IPC.
In the sessions & HC also rejected bail.
Anonymous
22 January 2011 at 08:59
Good morning sirs, did the Cr.P.C. amendment bill 2010 came into force in respect of bail by police i.e. Sec.41 Cr.P.C. If so from which date and copy of the gazette publication may be given.
Anonymous
21 January 2011 at 22:32
I have recently demolished an unauthorised wall in my premises to avoid adverse possession of the open area of my house by my relative who owns the front portion of the house. she has complaint to the police. So did I, but the police is threatening me of charging me under 448 IPC and 145 Crpc. I even have an MCD notice dated feb 2002, asking my mother to demolish all unauthorised structures including the 'wall'. My mother passed away that time and I was out of station. I have recently shifted to my portion of the house (back) and the front portion of the house is right now unoccupied. Yet the police is creating a problem for me.
Is it illegal to demolish an unauthorised wall? How can the police charge me of 448ipc and 145crpc, when i already have an MCD notice saying that the unauthorized structure has to be brought down.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
21 January 2011 at 22:27
My Learned Friends,
I have filed a complaint case under Sec 190 before CJM, which is a ‘warrant case’ on behalf of “two complainants No.1 (lady) and complainant No.2 (male)”. The CJM has transferred the ‘case’ to the ACJM-II and the trial was started off. First the ACJM-II has recorded the Examination of the complainant No.1 under Sec 200 Crpc and leave out/excluded the examination of the complainant No.2 under Sec 200 Crpc. After that he passed an order to bring the evidence/witnesses under Sec 202 Cr.p.C on the next date of hearing, which will come after sometime.
Now My queries are:-
Q1. I found that is irregularity committed by the ACJM-II for not recording the examination of the complainant No.2 under Sec 200 Crpc? because the Sec 13 of General clause Act provides as follows:-
13. Gender and number.- In all (Central Acts) and Regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context.- Words importing the masculine gender shall be taken to include females, and words in the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa.
Q2. That the Sec 202 Crpc the ACJM-II has NO power to call the evidence/witnesses directly while the ACJM-II has the power under Sec 200 Crpc to examine (all or any one of them) the evidence/witnesses (if any) before issue any process of warrant or summons under sec 204 Cr.pc?
Q3. That the Sec 202 Crpc only provides the power to ‘Session court’ to call the evidences/witnesses before issue any process of warrant or summons under Sec 204 CrpC ?
Q4. Now, What is the right procedure so that the irregularity is committed in trial, which makes set aside any irregularity by the Appellate Court on the mistake of ACJM-II. ?
// My local city lawyer friend opinion:- That make an application before ACJM-II to record the examination of the complainant No.2 also.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
21 January 2011 at 22:25
My Learned Friends,
I have filed a complaint case under Sec 190 before CJM, which is a ‘warrant case’ on behalf of “two complainants No.1 (lady) and complainant No.2 (male)”. The CJM has transferred the ‘case’ to the ACJM-II and the trial was started off. First the ACJM-II has recorded the Examination of the complainant No.1 under Sec 200 Crpc and leave out/excluded the examination of the complainant No.2 under Sec 200 Crpc. After that he passed an order to bring the evidence/witnesses under Sec 202 Cr.p.C on the next date of hearing, which will come after sometime.
Now My queries are:-
Q1. I found that is irregularity committed by the ACJM-II for not recording the examination of the complainant No.2 under Sec 200 Crpc? because the word "complainant/complainants in 200 CrpC" provide meaning as Sec 13 of General clause Act provides as follows:-
13. Gender and number.- In all (Central Acts) and Regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context.- Words importing the masculine gender shall be taken to include females, and words in the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa.
Q2. That the Sec 202 Crpc the ACJM-II has NO power to call the evidence/witnesses directly while the ACJM-II has the power under Sec 200 Crpc to examine (all or any one of them) the evidence/witnesses (if any) before issue any process of warrant or summons under sec 204 Cr.pc?
Q3. That the Sec 202 Crpc only provides the power to ‘Session court’ to call the evidences/witnesses before issue any process of warrant or summons under Sec 204 CrpC ?
Q4. Now, What is the right procedure so that the irregularity is committed in trial, which makes set aside any irregularity by the Appellate Court on the mistake of ACJM-II. ?
// My local city lawyer friend opinion:- That make an application before ACJM-II to record the examination of the complainant No.2 .
baswanth mohan paruchuri
21 January 2011 at 20:58
what are the reasons for the delay in the criminal proceedings in hierarchy of courts? what are the steps can be taken to speed up the proceedings in the criminal cases? . please also kindly post your valuable opinions on reasons for delay in administration of crimainl justice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
facing problem with court clerk
Hi All-
In recent past i am facing lot of problem with court clerk. whenever judge is not there he only gives the next court attending date by taking some 100/- as bribe. he enters the next court attending date on his papers with a pencil.once i am leaving the place he is changing the dates for his own adjustments. this is causing lot of problems to me.
because of this, i am facing lot of problems as if we dont attend the court warrant will be issued.
Can we do anything on this ? Can we complain to any one on this ? if so how and whom to approach ?