Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 21:36
When the accused is acquitted in trial court (cheque bounce case). High Court also confirms the acquittal. Whether the appeal to SC needs High Court’s Permission or not?
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 21:35
As per the Cr.P.C. Amendment the police is having the power to send summons to the accused. But the SC in 2004 Cr.LJ 2515 had held that the police can not summon the accused, because the possibility of arrest is there.
So, the cr.p.c amendment is against the SC decision. Whether it is beneficial to the accused or not. Please comment
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 21:34
As per the 2008 and 2010 amendment in Cr.P.C. in S.41, whether the Police is having the power to arrest the accused with notice?
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 21:31
Dear sir,
As per my knowledge N.I.Act 138 is praivet complain, but if complainant is govt.dept. like Sales tax dept. Is there any roll of Assi.public Prosecuter in trail or at any stage who is appointed u/s 25 of Cr.p.c.?
imteyaz farooquee
04 February 2011 at 21:26
Dear expert,
Please guide me , in Arms Act case, the cartridges were released in favour of a persons, who is the informant , on 50,000/- security bond, but during trial he did not produce those released articles after several notices. Now, the prosecution requested for forfeiture of bond, what is the process thereafter ? Whether the parent trial should be stopped and forfeiture proceeding will prevail in seperate form
imteyaz farooquee
04 February 2011 at 21:17
Accused persons were on police bail during investigation or by Chief Judicial Magistrate in lessor section but the charge sheet was submitted in graver section( such as 307 0r 302 IPC). After submission of the charge sheet, the defence lawyer prays to remain the accused persons on their previous bail (Police bail ). My question is that what a judicial Magistrate may order to continue on the same bail ? If yes or no, please give in detail and also cite ruling
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 20:29
Rewspected sir,
My wife has comitted offences u/s 192,197,199,200,209 punishable u/s 193of IPC. Now charges have been framed u/s 193 IPC and she has accepted and plead guilty and donot claim the trail. Now what will be the next step is it conviction or trail proceeding will be continue or is there any judgement for any further fast action
With regards
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 17:31
can the investigating police officer arrest the alleged accused person after he got the message of case diary call from the sessions court when the court of sessions calls for the case diary regarding a bail petition filed under section 438 of Cr.p.c.filed by the same accused person
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 14:44
QUOTE
. This was published on 22nd January 2009
March against “Medical Negligence” on Feb 6, 2009
.. Although two senior doctors were convicted by the trial court in 2002 for “criminal negligence” for the F.I.R.st time in Indian medico-legal history, the final verdict in this historic case has been deliberately delayed in the Supreme Court since 2005. |The powerful medical fraternity is not willing to let this case be listed for final hearing in the Apex Court until it can be placed before a suitable bench to purchase justice
UNQUOTE
can any non resident indian for the sake of gaining publicity say these statements in the media and in his website. that opp side is trying to purchase judges of apex court
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Anticipatory bail conditions impact
When the anticipatory bail is applied, the court orders for appearing before the court or police for getting bail. If he is not applied for AB the accused is having the choice of getting dropped from the criminal case. So, by applying the AB the accused is facing trouble just because of the conditions.
Please comment.