Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 16:11
Dear Sirs,
Can you please give me the proforma for filing a complaint u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. Should the originals cheques and agreement be enclosed? Thanks.
P RaviShankar-cell-8939332195
16 April 2011 at 15:10
sir,a woman co-worker pressed me by her breast nipple near my shoulder region. I want to have the woman prosecuted by filing a private complaint in the criminal court. what is the provision of law under which i can prosecute her. Please help me
Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 14:59
Can husband family seek justic for abetment to attempt to suicide against wife and her family, he was mentally harassed by false case and impotency claims.
Under what section FIR can be filed.
Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 14:51
Section 340 Cr PC has been devised as a way to prohibit and create a fear in the mind of those who file false documents or give false evidence in the Court of Law.
how to file a case under section aginst wife and her family, is it bailable and how month of punishment under this section if proven wrong.
Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 13:39
HELLO ALL LEARNED
A WIFE LEFT HER HUSBAND'S HOME WITH THE CHILDREN, THEREAFTER IN BUS WHERE SHE COMES VERY NEAR TO HER PARENTS HOME CONSUMED POISION AND INFORMED TO PARENTS THAT SHE HAS TAKEN POISION SHE WAS ADMITTED IN HOSPITAL FOR THE 15 DAYS WHERE SHE LODGED THE FIR AND GIVEN THE D.D. ALSO AND HE CLEARY STATED THAT HER HUSBAND WAS USED TO HER AS PROSTITUTE SO SHE CONSUMED THE POISION
NOW SHE WOULD LIKE TO COMPROMISE WITH THE CONDITION THAT HER HUSBAND SHOULD PURCHASE THE HOME IN THE NAME OF HER
AND SHE MAKES DRAMA BEFORE THE COURT. THE MARRIAGE PERIOD OF THEM IS MORE THAN 7 YEARS AND NOT A SINGLE CRIMINAL COMPLAIN LODGED AGAINST THE HUSBAND THE REAL FACT IS THAT SHE HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH THE OTHER MAN BUT IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVE WHAT DEFENCE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN THE COURT PROVIDE JUDGEMENTS IF ANY ONLY 498-a SECIONS CASE HAS BEEN REGISTERD AGAINST THE HUSBAND
PLS ADVICE THANKS IN ADVANCE REGARDS
Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 13:34
"A" "B" "C" "D" all are neighbours and females, above all are went to Public Tap for water for their use. "A" hited by "B" "C" "D" at public tap then "A" gave complaint in a police station against "B" "C" "D".
But police registered a case against all including "A" under section 160 of Indian Penal Code.
Fine imposed by court Rs.100/- per accused "B" "C" "D" admitted in court and paid fine. but "A" did not admitted in court. "A" contesting case in a court. now case stage is in Trail.
Still "B" "C" "D" are harrassing as no one can punish us by any body to "A" at public tap.
my querries are:
1. "A" wanted to file a another case in RDO
2. If "A" file a case in RDO Court, is it comes under Double Jeopardy or not
3. If "A" wanted to file a case, which section application
please give valuable suggestions Dear all experts
Thank you in Advance
harish sharma
16 April 2011 at 12:19
generally in mact cases magistrate consider that the fault is always heavy vehicle despite by the fault of smaller veichel .suggest me the on thing i have a one mact case this my client have a discover 125cc bike and met with accident a moter bike namely hero honda 100 cc my client got serious injury on his head and another person got simple injury.when we file a mact case the respondent take a defence that pettioner has a heavy veichle than me and the accident was occured by the negilance of pettioner himself. here pettioner coverd under the no fault liablity deciding the compensation under mact act. kindlly suggest .
thankig u
Anonymous
16 April 2011 at 11:57
Am a law graduate myself but work with the corporate. In 2006, while in employment with a company I was instructed to get the company's vehicle (with company's ownership )released on superdaari from Moti Nagar PS which I did since it was confiscated by the police officials. Before this the vehicle had met with an accident injuring a person the details of which I was not aware of. The person was discharged after a week from the hospital. I left the company in 2006 itself. I got calls from the PS to appear in the court which i did not attend. The court issued arrest warrants in 2011 which I got cancelled by presenting myself and stating that i do not remember any details of the matter.
Meanwhile, the company sold the vehicle which i came to know thru the driver who was in the court and in whose name the case is titled vs. state.
The magistrate has asked me to produce the vehicle on the next date which is in May, 2011 and has taken on record that I am epileptic patient with lapse of memory occuring occasionally, for which I have produced evidence on record.
I do not know the whereabouts of the present owner of the vehicle.
How should I proceed in the matter. I have the letter of employment of the company who was the owner of the vehicle at the time of accident. Will it be my liability to produce the vehicle when I am not the owner and which I got released on supardaari as a part of my duty under the employment of the Company. The MD of the Company had given me authorisation on co.'s letter head to get the vehicle released in my name as superdaar which is on court record. Please advise as i am already 58 plus of age and do not want any problem in legal proceedings. There is no fatal injury and i was not even with the vehicle when it met with the accident.
N.J. MISHRA
16 April 2011 at 10:33
I, HAVE FILE PRIVATE COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 403 & 406 OF IPC. THE MAGISTRATE HAS TAKEN THE COGNIZANCE AND HAD ISSUED PROCESS AGAINST THE ACCUSED. SUMMONS HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE ACCUSED. NOW WHAT WIIL BE NEXT STAGE IN THIS CASE. AS OF NOW I DON'T WANT TO INVOLVE ADVOCATE BASICALLY UP TO THE STAGE OF EVIDENCE. PLEASE MEMBER SUGGEST ME.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Constable Suspended.
Hindustan Times Dated 16/4/2011
Page No 5
Under trial commits suicide in jail, family suspects foul play
Second last para of the article says that
We did the Panchnama on Firday Morning as we cannot do it after sunset. Pls provide me the rule or section of the Crpc which says that Panchnama cannot be performed on night or we can say after sunset.
& On Page No 7
Short Stories
2 constables suspended after man dies in the custody. Pls provide me the rule or section of the Crpc which says that constable can be suspended if any person detained by the office department dies in the police custody. & How has the power to suspended the constables. Also what right does the constables has to defeat themselves.
Thanks To ALl Them .