Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   29 April 2011 at 16:54

RAISING OBJECTION,POINT OF ORDER


No body shared my question?Is it soo deficult? UNDER WHAT CIRCUMASTENCES &
WHEN A OBJECTION CAN BE RAISED?
WHAT IS THE PROVISION UNDERWHICH IT DELT ?
-------------------------------------------
CAN IT BE COMPALSARYLEY CONCERDERE OR CAN IT BE OVERLOOKED BY THE COURT IN ITS ORDER OR JUDGEMENT?
WETHER SUCH OBJECTIONS REQUIRE IN WRITTEN SUBMISSION?
WETHER THE SAME PROVISION CAN BE MADE IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES
M.RAVINDER BABU,ADVOCATE
PARKAL.DIST WARANGAL.AP.
9885627313

Anonymous   29 April 2011 at 16:51

FRAUD


KINDLY CAN ANY SUPPLY ME ALD 2004(4)77 POCHIREDDY VS RDO VIKARABAD AP

Suresh Pitchaimuthu   29 April 2011 at 13:54

Quash under 226

If a quash petition under CrPC 482 is rejected in HC then after that is it possible to file another quash under article 226 in the HC. or approaching the SC is only option?

Proffessional   29 April 2011 at 11:47

Cheque bounce case

I know a person who is doing business with my office for past 4 years, he took a new job and to execute the work he asked me to invest some money, so that he may return back with some profit. Besed on his words, I took loan from my brother and gave money to a known person of Rs.5 lakhs for his business purpose who is doing the job at my office and got a post dated cheque for the same in the name of my wife. As per the cheque dated I have deposited in my wife current account and got bounced due to insufficient funds. When I checked with the person, he asked me to re present the cheque after 5 days and I did the same. Again the cheque got bounced due to stop payment. I tried to reach him through mobile several times and at last he picked the call and he said that, “I won’t pay back your money, if you want you can file a case we will see in court” Also he said, “I will tell in court that, I only gave you the cheque as a bribe to take the order in your company”. After this I have sent him a layer notice but he not responded to it. Now we yet to file a case and also I came to know he will not come to court even if summon comes from court. What will happen if he not comes to court on summon or even if he comes what will be the judgment. Please help me out.

M. ASLAM FAROOQUI   29 April 2011 at 11:14

Hand Wrirting Expert

section 138 of N. I. Act

Whehter the Report and Evidence of Private Hand Writing Expert is admissible in Court.

The Hand writing Expert gave report that the signature on the cheque is not of the accused.

dadu nikhilendra singh   29 April 2011 at 08:23

ipc420

sir, in 1996 i and purchaser entered into unregistered agreement to sale. My father died in 1991. We are four brothers. Mutation was not happend at the time of agreement . Now in 2011 purchaser is making complain against me that without mutation i sing agreement. In mutation2001 my brother has bcome cosharer. In between purchasar never came to me, even no notice given. In fact i had given a notice by upc,What will happen? Plz sugest

Anonymous   29 April 2011 at 01:03

Loans & maintenance.

Hello Sir,
1. I need help in form of Case references or Citations to support my pleadings for considering my Home Loan and personal loans while deciding the maintenance order in Domestic Violance case falsely filed by my wife against my entire family.
Please help.
2. Also I wish to know if she fails to prove the Domestic Violence, will she still be entitled for maintenance or any other benefits ?

Warm regards.

Arka Foundation   28 April 2011 at 23:46

Stop 2nd marriage of husband

Dear Experts,

In one of my client[wife/women] case:

Husand filed divorce

In between it husband got ex-parte orders

Wife challenged ex-parte order in High Court and the case is still pending.

Husband 2nd wife called 1st wife that,
"all your allegations completed with my would be[husband of 1st wife]?" and disconnectd the call.

Now my question:
How to stop husband 2nd marriage as such, the divorce petition is still pending in the high court, which was challenged by the 1st wife.

Please give valuable advices for my client

Anonymous   28 April 2011 at 20:57

women protection act sec 18/19/21

One day before women protection act, divorce occurred in USA. Both spouse US citizen. Married out side India by Christian ceremony. Ex Husband became very sick ( cancer) Surgery failed in USA. Decided to come to India for second surgery. Ex-wife offered help to join him hoping he may die. She hide divorce from all her relatives. she even sealed divorce decree in US court. When ex-husband survived, he paid her 50% of the share of the property by getting notarized sale deed and power of attorney.
When he got married , ex became jealous and sued him civil court stating that she signed paper with out understanding. she is highly educated.. Then now she went to women protection act section 18/19/21 asking him everything from under the pretext of live-in- relationship.
My question: 1. Does women protection act applicable in this case since divorce was before the act?
2. neither party married under Hindu marriage act, nor they are Indian citizen, does women protection act is applicable?
3.ex has came with specific purpose and stayed in the same house in separate bedrooms, ex-husband was having cancer and other illness, not having any physical relationship with her, does co-habtation occurs?
4. Recent ruling says relationship for” significant time” what does it mean? In the past ruling it said long term relationship etc. but now it does not define significant time.
Will appreciate any guidance.

Anonymous   28 April 2011 at 20:56

Good Question.

Our case is under ITAT (income tax appellate tribunal) in short in appeal & the Commissioner Of Income tax for where we have preferred a appeal has filed a wrong statement (in Affidavit) so can we file a case against him u/s 193 & 196 of the IPC, 1860 because as per the IT Act, 1961 any proceedings under this act is a judicial proceedings & as a civil court as per section 136 of the IT Act, 1961. So as we have seen that it is a judicial proceedings & section 196 & 193 is applicable to the IT Act, 1961 so can we file a case u/s 340, 344 & 195 of the Crpc, 1973. Against CIT (commissioner of income tax) . If possible support the answer with SC case only .
Case law required. Case law required.
Case law required.
Case law required.
Case law required.
Case law required.

Thanks