if counsel do not cross examine a witness then neccessary inference drawn is he accept the truth but i want to ask is there any exceptions to it.
.
Anonymous
01 July 2011 at 22:56
What does the Supreme Court have to say about granting bail during pendency of Appeal against accused?
Anonymous
01 July 2011 at 22:44
If the set of facts for criminal proceedings and departmental proceedings are identical the latter cannot be proceeded with.
It means the criminal proceedings will override the departmental proceedings any case decided by the HC or SC in keeping in mind the above point.
High Court or Supreme Court will not quash FIR lodged by the Factory Inspector.
Any case is decided which has been said that Factory Inspector FIR canno't be quashed.
Also opinion on the above are welcome.
Thanks to the contribution.
Anonymous
01 July 2011 at 22:40
grammatical variations and cognate expression
A simple example helping me to understand the meaning of the above mentioned. If any case is decided by considering the above line then with do respect paste in this forum.
Anonymous
01 July 2011 at 22:01
r/LCI Members
My neighbour has constructed his new building and he has encroched /extended his building upto about 10 -15 feet in railway land, railway officers are not taking any action despite knowledge of this encrochment for the reasons best known to them, i have heard that there is spesific provision under Railways property (unlawful possession )Act in respect of encrochment on railway land, i am ready to move written complaint before railways authority for registration of FIR against this encrochment , i want to know any public man can file complaint for registration of FIR in such situation,kindly help,railway officers are not taking any action ,kindly also suggest me any remedy/provision so that i can file complaint/petition in court directly,Thanks .Regards
Mayuresh Gujar
01 July 2011 at 20:33
Sir,
1.cheque rtn memo 5/5/2011
2.demand notice date 14/5/2011.
3. Acknowledgement receipt not received hence application given for "post certificate" 0n 15/6/2011 as per post office rule.
4.certificate received on 18/6/2011.
"delivered on 19/5/2011"
my Question is from which date limitation is start?
A. From 19/5/2011
B.from 18/6/2011 (post certificate)
GYANPRAKASH CHOUHAN
01 July 2011 at 14:41
Sir, my wife admitted in a reputed army hospital of India as a case of labour pain being E.D.D.(expected date of delivery ) on 8th of April 2007 as per the guide line and instruction of the treating doctor (as well as to comply the order of Honb'le PRESIDENT OF INDIA through the National rural health mission guide line also.) While all the anti-natal check found absolutly normal during past nine month ANC check-up. 1- being admitted in same hospital (and under the same doctor ) prmisses since last three days the UTERUS of lady was ruptured on 10th of April 07 at about 1300 pm and new born male baby died, also lady fall in COMA due to severe bleeding. After all the efforts made by me to get her treated since I,am a PAID membership holder of EX-SERVICEMAN CONTRIBUTRY HEALTH SCHEME(ECHS) by the Government the army refused to give further treatment and dishcharged her after eight month by stating that since the husband is paramedical person and he should take care his wife at his home.And more ever I,was working with the same hospital during those days on contractul appointment hence even they have terminated my services immidiately without giving any prior notice ,because of why most probably that I,suit a case against them to high court.Now case is still pending while high court is also agree that the negligiencies occured by the hospital. 2- I, have complained to President of India / Prime minister of India / Chief justice of Rajasthan /District collector of jodhpur / SP of jodhpur / and every higher authority of Army /Navy through registered speed post. But NO RESPONCE. Because of that most probably I,am not a inflluancefull dignity or person ."AGAR MERI AURAT KI JAGAH KOI V.I.P. KI AURAT HOTI TO KABHI KI COURT OF ENQUARY HO GAI HOTI" 3- My wife expired on 8th Mar 09. 4- All the document was asked by me from army as per RTI but no responces was given even as instructed by MCI also to provide me the medical documents rather than a single little case summary, inspite of giving complete serially attested medical documents .The case was under consumer court where the judge of the case who was continusly studying since last two years was the same judge. but unfortunatly on last 06th June 2011 a new judge who was in his first hearimg on the chair particularly for my wife's case he dismissed the case by one of the point that the husband is a paramedical person and he should know all the consiquance for what has happened. I,FEEL REALLY ITS A GREAT JOKES FOR THE NATION AS WELL AS FOR COMMUNITY SOCITY. PLEASE LET ME ASK YOUR KIND HELP AT THIS STAGE AS I, am not a reach person with presently serviving three daughter with me.I, WILL BE EVER GREATFULL TO ALL OF YOU. My mail i.d. is - GYANUCHOUHAN@REDIFFMAIL.COM. THANKS AND AN EARLY RESPONCE IS REQUESTED.
Anonymous
01 July 2011 at 14:22
The SC has told the police not to handcuff accused.
Suicide in police custody
With respect to the LD members Guidelines required. Guidelines given by the SC on the above 2 topic required. If any more case law which should be referred along with the case law.
Also sir meaning of privileged communication any case law ?
Thanks.
R.SHAH
01 July 2011 at 12:25
DEAR ALL,
DURING I.O'S EXAMINATION THE COMPLAINANT/ACCUSED CAN EXHIBIT THEIR COMPLAINTS/APPLICATION LETTER GIVEN TO POLICE STATION IN DIFFERENT TIME TO DIFFERENT OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGE. BY SHOWING THOSE DOCUMENTS HAVING IN CASE PAPERS WHICH WERE SEND THRU CHARGESHEETS BY POLICE.
IS THE I.O'S IS THE PERSON WHO CAN INDENTIFIED AS MANY AS OTHER OFFICER AS RECIEVER OF POLICE STATION A COMPLAINTS/LETTERS WHILE REFERRING TO HIM. TO BROUGHT ON RECORD AS EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS.
KINDLY EXPLAINED
cheating n recover money
sir,i had given two ladies alleged to have stated running medical admission consultan,25 lacs before ten days,.i took bond papers address of their office n reciept with post dat. cheque frm them.i was asked 1 weak 4 admissn process.but now wen i return back to their offic or home both lock.i think cheq also will bounce i havent deposi in my bank ac?so wat shall i do.a FIR in p.s. Followed by a recovery suit or a ccb or cheating case.pl provie a firm suggestion n wat shd i mention in fir n case particularly.thanx