Anonymous
20 July 2011 at 06:28
Sir,
I have a case where there was zirah before charge being conducted by accused Mr. y on accuser Mr. x in a case of 420,467,468,4971.
It is a private istgasa.
Hearing was proposed for Tuesday wednessday and Thursday .
On Tuesday cross was done by mr y and wedness he took leave on chest pain, when he came on Thursday he was shocked to see that he could not ask further questions.
Mr. y was on leave for one day and the honorable judge closed the right to ask further questions on the ground that this taking of leave is a deliberate delaying tactics.
Mr. y has taken leave only once in the last 40 hearings.
The nature of the case is such that Mr. x has charged with cases of frauds such as money grabbing from fixed assets +purchase of raw material +selling without invoices + and inducing Mr. x to invest the amount in the co on the strength of forged photocopy of balance sheet. + taking of full subsidy by promoters.
In co. accounts which were made and got audited by mr x there is normal and no descrpancy reported.
Mr. x has shown some invoices +bills etc to his support.
He has not produced any accounts of the co. to back up his charge to back up his charge that money is actually grabbed by the promoters.
Mr. y was able to get two balance sheets of the co. and was trying to extract the truth asking Mr. x the logical comparative mathematical questions which were going to tell the truth that the charges are basically and primarily false. He was on the border of extracting the truth out of mr x.
This is worth adding here that FIR in this case was closed by the police AND FR IS MADE.
Then civil suit done by the accuser TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SAME FACTS could not run/STAND.
My question is if Mr. y should go in for revision or not AGAINST THIS CLOSURE OF RIGHT TO ASK.
PLEASE GUIDE.
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 23:51
sir what is the period to file scst case?
what is the period to file misconduct of advocate in state bar council sir?
what is the proceedure of misconduct case at council?
in misconduct of advocate case should i appoint advocate from my side or council will take case sir ?
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 23:50
CAN U HELP ME IN TELLING THE TIMEFRAME FOR THE POLICE TO FILE TO FILECHARGESHEETIN THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 23:48
sir what is the period to file scst case?
what is the period to file misconduct of advocate in state bar council sir?
what is the proceedure of misconduct case at council?
in misconduct of advocate case i have to appoint advocate from my side or council will do sir ?
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 23:47
Divorce has been settled between husband and wife, while the dowry and alimony case is still oending in the court.
The ex-wife has come to know husband doing second marriage during divorce petition. How is this proof goign to help the ex-wife in her existing case and any other legal action available?
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 23:39
Husband and wife got divorced though lower court, higher court and then supreme court. Post divorce, the wife got to know that husband did a second marrige while the divorce case was pending in the court.
My question is, whether the wife (post divorce) canget the case re-opened and file for a bigamy case? If possible, then what are the legal options avaialable to ex-wife?
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 22:59
If the party who lodge the fir agrees and settle all disputes with other party and give affidavit ..If request is made to SP of that area
can he cancel that fir???
Case is in lower court right now...
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 22:44
what is the procedure of restoration of 138 complaint and please tell me the caselaw for JMFC have jurisdiction of restoration of 138
Jayesh Kumar
19 July 2011 at 21:59
All Experts,
Hi,
Can a petition/application filed for taking action under Criminal contempt of courts be filed at the trial court and can the trial court take cognizance of the same and if evidance is found take action against the people for Criminal Contempt of Courts?
What about Civil contempt?
There is some confusion regarding which Court can take cognizance, the High Court or the can the trial Court also take cognizance.
Regards,
when does a person is said to be prosecuted?
Say an FIR is lodged but immediately a compromise is made between two parties and police files a final report stating that compromise has been made and case should be closed.Later a protest petition (private complaint)on final report is made on the same case which is dismissed under Section 203 of CrPC.Will a person against who all this is done be said to be prosecuted ever?