Bhagyashree Ambekar
25 January 2020 at 14:58
I was a part time Executive director for a finance company bin Sindhdurg, Mahasahtra from May 2000 to Dec 2000. I resigned as I was in full time employment in Mumbai and was unable to travel due to my work commitments. the company started the following requirements in 2003 which is after 3 entire years after my resignation. My name is mentioned by some depositors in this case and now I have to face the court under the MPID Act in Sindhdurg, Maharashtra.
Anonymous
24 January 2020 at 11:42
Sirs,
At the trial PW(govt) in Acb case , refused to support Panchnama and stated at the trial court what actually happened at the time of trap and also denyed the demand of money by accused person ,and also stated that the accused person was not came at the trap place but the complainant ride him at the place and complaintant hand over money to his blood relation brother .Now is the question that may court convict accused person on ground of complaintant JUBANI ?
Whereas Panch not supported complaintant.
Anonymous
23 January 2020 at 10:11
Dear all, I would like to draw your attention to the recent banking scam in Sri Guru Raghavendra Co-op bank in bangalore where RBI has ordered the bank to stop all normal functions of the bank such as acceptance of new deposits, grant of new loans or making new investments and put a cap on withdrawal of amount by each person to a maximum of Rs.35000/- for a period of six months.. In this case, can the depositor can a police complaint of cheating against the bank management where they they been giving false information regarding NPA and such other financial information based on which the innocent depositor has deposited money in bank.? Will the police be able to take action based on the complaint filed by the depositor?
Vinod shah
22 January 2020 at 10:50
Accused got aquited in trial court in cheque case. Complainant file appeal in HIGH COURT.
The trial court judgments is on some trival issues and earlier citations which may not sustain in HICH COURT.
However there are some other issues like illegality of documents and evidence which the accused did not raise in trial court- whether he can do it now.
Anonymous
21 January 2020 at 15:54
I took a loan from a private lender and paid back with hefty interest. The amount I paid as interest is more than 50% for a few months. The lender continues to harass me. How can I take it legally?
Mehajbee
21 January 2020 at 15:21
One Person has charged with section 353 ,504 and 506,which are wrongly charged .
My Question listed below :-
1) 353 is applicable on telephone conversation.
2) Also 504 and 506 is applicable on telephonic conversation
3) Before Charge sheet can the Complainant take back his FIR from the police for above sections.
4) 353 is bailable and compoundable
5) Can we apply for quashing of FIR U/S 482 before charge sheet
6) Also the Accused Person is handicapped and Paralyzed ,also the conversation was completely over telecom . So what remedies accused have.
7) I also have the FIR copy ,but unable to attach here .
Dharani
16 January 2020 at 16:16
Hi all,
I would like to know what are the punishment under section 279&338.
If in case if I found guilty or I pay the fine in court will it affect my work visa to travel.
Madhu Mittal
16 January 2020 at 15:05
An accused in a case of 2012 u/s 138 N I Act which is still stage of cross examination of complainant , filed an application to dismiss the case only on the ground that a General Index in the prescribed form (F. IV) under rule 27 of The General Rules (Criminal), 1980 is not available in file.
27. General Index. - Upon institution of a case, a General Index in the prescribed form (F. IV) shall be opened. In it shall be entered a note of every paper or document along with the date of its presentation, in the order in which they were brought on record.
Please guide to complainant what to do to save the complaint as there is no General Index in the prescribed form (F. IV) on record/in file.
I am complainant
neeraj
15 January 2020 at 13:25
Hello,
My aunty are one of the accused in 138 case she did not signed any check but she is the joint account holder of the cheque. cheque is signed by her husband. And also the check was not given to the complainant but missused by a financer how handed over the cheque in question to a third person.
Case in court and we already logged a complaint u/s 340 against the complainant.
What else we can do.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding denial of bank account by wife
Wife asserts in court in maintenance case and divorce case that the accounts opened in name of wife which have plenty of money really opened by her husband in her name to park his untaxed income ..but in actual she opened and operated account for her ...court rejected application to call bank statement of wife.,..what should be done