Vennila
11 November 2009 at 13:26
Hi Everybody,
Greetings!!!
Please suggest!!!
What are the actions can be taken against Chit Fund Fraud, Already complaint is filed by the public. We are not aware of the follow-ups that has to be made from the public's end. Please guide us.
Best Regards,
Nila
Vennila
11 November 2009 at 13:17
Hi Everybody,
Greetings!!!
Please what are actions can be taken against Chit Fund Fraud, Already complaint is filed by the public. We are not aware of the follow-ups that has to be made from our the public's end. Please guide us.
Best Regards,
Nila
Anonymous
11 November 2009 at 07:58
Dear expert.,
what do you mean by INTERPOL? how they work from india.
manjunath kini
11 November 2009 at 00:27
Dear sirs,
How i can bring back any person, who is not in india ., back to india for investigation of case or for hearing..if he is not ready to come back to india.
manjunath kini
11 November 2009 at 00:23
Dear frieds,
I am getting lot of harrasment emails from one of my partner( we break the partnership 2 year back).
but at present,he is not in India. i need guidance on following area:
1. what leagal action, i can take against him.
2.where, i have to file the case( at present i am in mumbai)
3.How, i or leagal authoristies will take investigation or action aganist him.
4.How long it will take .
Deepak Jain
10 November 2009 at 20:59
CAN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA OR HIGH COURTS
TAKE COGNISANCE SUO MOTO OF MNS CHIEF'S HATE SPEECHES AND ITS MLAS' ROUDY BEHAVIOUR IN MAHARASHTRA ASSEMBLY.
DEEPAK JAIN
rajesh
10 November 2009 at 16:30
M/S ABC (WHICH IS LICENSEE UNDDER ELECTRICITY ACT) HAS GIVEN CONTRACT TO EXECUTE THE SPECIFIC WORK TO SOME CONTRACTOR
THRES IS AN ACCIDENT ON SITE DUE TO WHICH CASE OF 304A HAS BEEN REGISTERED BY STATE
KINDLY TELL ME HOW MUCH M/S ABC COMPANY AND ITS EMPLOYEES ARE RESPONSIBLE
Anonymous
10 November 2009 at 14:17
Dear Sir,
I want to have some clarifications regarding the above subject.
1. Whether is it possible to file a case under SC/ST Act,
Sec.3(1)(X)when an incident occurs in a private building? In the
recent judgement of Madras High Court it was stated that even if the
offence occurs inside before some friends and relatives it is enough
and there is public view which is an offence. Whether it is correct?
2. The Bombay High Court had given a judgement in Crl.W.P.No.2593/2008
(Mrs.Pushpa Vijay Bonde vs. MH state police) that the complainant
should have mentioned in his complaint had told the accused that he
belongs to SC/ST community and if there was no mention in his complaint
and deposition it was not an offence under Sec.3. It had cited the Apex
Court judgement Ashabai Machindra Adhagale's case. I want to get a copy
of the above Apex Court judgement. How can I get it?
3. SC/ST Rule 7(2) it is stated that the investigating officer should
complete the investigation within 30 days. As per records he had
obtained depositions from the Prosecution Witnesses on the next date of
FIR (26.02.2009), obtained the deposition from one PW (Tasildhar) on
05.07.2004 regarding the community of the accused and filed his charge
sheet in the JM-II court on 06.07.2004. The investigation conducted
beyond 30 days is against the said rule. Whether my contention is
correct?
4. In the statements of PW1-10 stated that A3 was the brother of A1, but PW11(DSP) in his statement noted A3 as the son of A1. This is wrong. Whether the charge sheet can be proved as false? Is there any ruling for it?
On 10.11.09 I have sent the queries 1-3, but they were neither found in the list nor answered.
I shall be thankful if my queries are answered.
MD ABDUL KADHER, TN
Anonymous
10 November 2009 at 13:30
in case of sec,457 court orderd A B J of property in a leased site.but certain other properties also attached which is not mentioned by court.now police ask very huge amount of bond to release that property.now my question is is any provision /judgement are available to decrease the amountin case of wrongful valuation. the property is a ganeretor set worthing more than Rs 25lakh
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
citation / law point and guideline
- An employee (Shorty) steals the cheque book of his employer / shop-owner (Hardy).
- Hardy (Complainant) lodged an FIR against Shorty.
- Advocate for Shorty along-with pre-arrest bail application also submits an agreement of a huge amount (gives numbers of FOUR cheques from said stolen cheque book) claiming that such agreement was signed by the Hardy but Hardy declares the same (his signatures on the Agreement) as fake / forged and untrue.
- Shorty obtained a pre-arrest bail from court
- The case is at the stage of investigation, Police did not submit the Challan till now, Shorty is still on pre-arrest bail.
- Advocate for Hardy (the complainant) submits a application before the court for the verification of signature of Hardy from an Expert,
Question:
Court asks question from the Advocate for the complainant, whether such an application for the verification of signature from an Expert can be moved at this stage of Bail period?
I shall be thankful if any colleague / expert can provide me some citation / law point and guideline.
With regards,
MAAZ