Anki Reddy
20 January 2010 at 09:34
Sir,
I have lost my credit card long time ago (23-Jan-2004) which was issued by Standard Chartered, just after I lost the card I have submitted my requisition to block the card on 24-january-2004 and which was duly acknowledged by the Standard Chartered bank personnel.
But after 6 years I have received a legal notice showing that I am defaulter for some amount which was not used by me at all.
When I have contacted the customer care the say the card was in used till October, 2004 so please guide me on how to proceed further.
Please find the attachments of scanned copy of the letter submitted to the Standard Chartered and their legal notice to me.
An early response would be highly help full to me.
Thanking you,
Anki Reddy
Cell: +91-90000 81513
Anki Reddy
20 January 2010 at 09:31
Sir,
I have lost my credit card long time ago (23-Jan-2004) which was issued by Standard Chartered, just after I lost the card I have submitted my requisition to block the card on 24-january-2004 and which was duly acknowledged by the Standard Chartered bank personnel.
But after 6 years I have received a legal notice showing that I am defaulter for some amount which was not used by me at all.
When I have contacted the customer care the say the card was in used till October, 2004 so please guide me on how to proceed further.
Please find the attachments of scanned copy of the letter submitted to the Standard Chartered and their legal notice to me.
An early response would be highly help full to me.
Thanking you,
Anki Reddy
Cell: +91-90000 81513
Anonymous
19 January 2010 at 22:27
I need Judgments/Citations of Delhi HC and Supreme Court stating that Supplementary statement can't be used to make territorial jurisdiction of the FIR. This situation has arisen at the time of taking congnizance by the Magistrate and we need to show it to Magistrate that Supplementary statement can't be used to make territorial jurisdiction of FIR.
Anonymous
19 January 2010 at 19:49
In a reference made by subordinate courts to High court for initiation of criminal contempt proceeding within the meaning of sec 2-c of contempt of court acts 1971; subordinate courts created false evidence in support of their reference? How can these judges be prosecuted for committing the offence of creating & giving false evidence before High court? whether any sanction is required u/s 197 crpc & a complaint is required by the court u/s 195 crpc? Can both of these provisions i.e. sec 197 & 195 crpc be ignored,while filling criminal complaint against those judges?
Milind Joshi
19 January 2010 at 17:45
As per the amendment in Section 202 of CR.P.C. Following insertion is made" and shall when accused is residing at a place beyond the are in which magistrate exercises his jurisdiction". Now as per this amendment Whether it is incumbent upon magistrate to compulsorily postpone the issue process or if a material before him is like such in a case when offence committed can be seen prima facie and accused is beyond the jurisdiction. Whether Magistrate can pass an order of issue process when he has satisfied primarily when accused is beyond the jurisdiction instead of sending it for investigation or the word shall denotes that he must send it for investigation. What is scope of words in the section "Sufficient Grounds"? Are there any case laws after the amendment of 2005 which says magistrate can pass an order of issue process directly instead of postponement of issue process, when magistrate is satisfied prima facie. Please send me the Object of said amendment of 2005 also.
Anonymous
19 January 2010 at 16:13
Sir,
I was issued a cheque for a certain amount and then later informed that a stop payment order has been made on this. This was done without my consent. Can I charge them with an offense?
thamilarasan
19 January 2010 at 16:03
sir im thamilarasan from tamilnadu there is an criminal case on me two years back it was filed sir but still now i did not have any earing in the court i want to know whether the case will be cancelled or not
Anonymous
19 January 2010 at 14:28
My client has a current account in this Bank 1. Additionally, he also enjoys a Term loan provided by the Bank. The Bank has opened an internal account called as ABC Limited Term loan A/C for their operational use internal.
In a particular instant, my client had provided a crossed cheque to his branch manager of Bank #1, this chq was issued from my clients own account in an another bank (say for e.g. ABC Limited a/c in Bank 2) to be deposited in its own account in the Bank 1 (for e.g. ABC Limited account in Bank1).
Taking an advantage of an natural calamity that struck my clients factory, the vily branch manager deposited this cheque in the internal account i.e. Term Loan A/c and not the Current A/c as it is regularly done.
This cheque bounced as there was no funds created in the Bank 2 account due to the calamity.
Can the Bank fradulently clain that they are the holder-in-due-course as the name of the account are identical. Can the procedure of 138 D be initiated claiming that such a cheque was a payment to the loan account.
Anonymous
19 January 2010 at 12:38
Last week The Hindu published about some directions and suggestions given by Supreme Court regarding cheque bounce cases.If any one among the expert panel help me to get the details?
my email id is vcnsethumadhav@gmail.com
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
BASIC INFORMATION ON CRIMINAL LAW
For more information and help visit www.airyourlegalqueries.com