yogesh bawiskar
14 February 2010 at 21:30
in matter of 138 of N I Act whether Accused may file his affidavit and document in his defence evidence
yogesh bawiskar
14 February 2010 at 21:28
in matter of 138 of N I Act whether Accused may file his affidavit and document in his defebce evidence
yogesh bawiskar
14 February 2010 at 20:50
whether the accused may exhibit his documents in 313 of Cr.P.C. accused didnot want to testify himself.
Anonymous
14 February 2010 at 20:47
whether the accused may exhit his documents in 313 of Cr.P.C. accused didnot want to testify himself
suhasini
14 February 2010 at 17:40
respected Sir,
I want to know the meaning of this, as i suspect to be the victim of this act.I feel as during last four years someone is trying to washup my brain with my intellegence and insert all dirt in that.I am a CA student, I have been facing this problem from last four years.One more thing is that one guys is harassing me from last four year. The thing is not only he but also i suspect he keeps contact with my friends and neighbour, Isn't this a crimeagainst someone. Can please anyone give me a valuable suggestion on this. one more thing is that are their any prevention measure from govt side for female workers working in small office, which can prevent them form sexual harrashment or any such type of act.Please give me your valuable suggestion, this i have passed through all this, and i want to know the law regarding this which can prevent me in future from all this. I am a working girl want to make a stand in the society.thanking you.
SAJAN ANTONY N.
14 February 2010 at 15:30
IN A BAILABLE OFFENCE WHETHER THE PLEADER MAY GET THE FREE COPY OF FIR BEFORE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ACCUSED, IF THERE IS VAKKALTH
Anonymous
14 February 2010 at 12:39
im told that if a person has political clout,he can go unpunished even though the crime committed is grave.
if u know a politician as high as a state minister,even though there is a murder case on u,nothing actually happens.
'case maafi ki jasakta hai!'
comment.
Chetan
14 February 2010 at 11:46
In a case of 138 the accused issued the voucher to the complainant
I said here voucher because that was not the bank but it is an Credit Societies registered under the Cooperative Societies Act and and also not obtain the Banking Business Licence from RBI
In such cirumstance my line of defence is correct
Pls guide me with provision and case laws....
Chetan
14 February 2010 at 11:41
I am on the side of accused in 138 Case
I intends to examine the bank manager of Pat Santha
Wheter I can re-exam the witness which have been called by me as a bank witness
Pls provide citations and provision
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
174[477A. Falsification of accounts ,IPC
i have fullproof official documents against a stste government servant under section mentioned above.
where & how to lodge complaint for prompt action? the department we work may fever him. i am also a govt. servant in the same office.
thanking you