Thyagarajan
25 June 2011 at 10:16
Apex court has ruled Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums can not entertain complaints against BSNL. If as against this a forum admits a complaint can BSNL approach High Court on a writ asking it to interfere or had to approch applelette authority of the consumer court?
Also Apex court had observed all City Developement authorities like CMDA are service providers. Ignoring this if a district court refuses to follow the guide lines and dismisses a petition against CMDA as CMDA is not a service provider ,can an aggrieved litigant approach High court on Article 226?
Anonymous
25 June 2011 at 09:28
There are so many incidents of deadly attacks on RTI activists and also threats, false cases etc. even by government agencies. Since information sought under RTI is supposed to be publicly available information, if an RTI applicant in order to safegaurd himself from such deadly attacks, false cases etc. and also to protect his privacy(since no privacy law in India) does not put in his real name and address in application, what legal cases he may face?
Anonymous
23 June 2011 at 21:26
Learned Counsels,
What is the procedure to get the SLP against the order of Writ Appeal of HC posted before the constitution bench.
Is there any eligibility criteria for such posting in terms of question of law.
Can every matters which are res integra be posted before five judge bench.
Please enlighten.
Anonymous
22 June 2011 at 20:18
The Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 is still in force or repealed.
Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949 is still in force or repealed.
What does this laws says actually.
Anonymous
22 June 2011 at 11:12
Dear Sir,
I am a central govt employee. In a trivial dispute, court has issued summons u/s 323 IPC on the basis of complaint case filed with the court. The court has not directed any FIR but on the basis of pre summoning evidence recorded by the court issued the said summons. Whether Under the conduct rules of central govt., I am supposed to inform in this regard to my office. If yes, please inform about the said specific conduct rule.
Regards
Kanchan Soni
21 June 2011 at 16:53
hello sir / madam
are fundamental duties enforceable?
want to have detail on this topic.
please reply as early as possible.
thank you
Member (Account Deleted)
20 June 2011 at 14:15
hello experts,
i want your opinion on a topic. Pl give your valuable opinion on it........
--there should be a review system in constitution??
Anonymous
20 June 2011 at 09:55
In Banking industry in India it has become practice to issue chargesheet on the last working day of employee to fridge the retiremantal benefit including P.F.And pension on the ground of pending enquiry.How this can be stoped? Secondly all enquary must be compleeted before the retairment of the emploee and judgement must be announce befire retairment of the emploee. A Bank official entire his life work hard & very honestly,during his tuner various business decissions are taken by him by which the organisation took high profits,by any of the reason if assets turn in to NPA even after 5-10 years of its sanctions.How this practice can be stoped ,because after retairment from the job his bread comes from this pension and P F money,and this must be relese on the day of retairment,what ever punishment is desire it must be announce before retairment.Please suugest your exper views.
Rajanikanth
20 June 2011 at 07:11
Hi, wish to know is there any legal restriction in setting up a industrial unit on land owned by Schedule caste person.
is there any SC judgement in this regard
please send reply to:-
rajanikanth.rama@gmail.com
Rajanikanth.R
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 112
Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 112. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy - "The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten."
Can any body explain this Section ?