Anonymous
27 June 2011 at 13:00
Dear Sir,
 Lecturers appointed in private colleges are experiencing very pathetic condition of under employment.
 They do not have any job security, no rights, no benefits.
 With regard to certain rights of these lecturers, I want to know clear details please provide.
 Are the lecturers appointed in private colleges put in a permanent vacancy?
 How long can a lecturer be kept in probation period?
 What percentage of tuition fees collected from students should be paid as salary or what is the actual salary structure or what is the minimum salary as per minimum wages act ?
 What is the the department of education of state government in regulating the rights and benefits of the lecturers?
 What is the role of Labour commission of India in protecting the rights of these lecturers?
 What are the rules of the Labour commission and or the Education department in protecting the rights of these lecturers ?
Anonymous
26 June 2011 at 08:35
Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 112. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy - "The fact that any person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten."
Can any body explain this Section ?
Thyagarajan
25 June 2011 at 10:16
Apex court has ruled Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums can not entertain complaints against BSNL. If as against this a forum admits a complaint can BSNL approach High Court on a writ asking it to interfere or had to approch applelette authority of the consumer court?
Also Apex court had observed all City Developement authorities like CMDA are service providers. Ignoring this if a district court refuses to follow the guide lines and dismisses a petition against CMDA as CMDA is not a service provider ,can an aggrieved litigant approach High court on Article 226?
Anonymous
25 June 2011 at 09:28
There are so many incidents of deadly attacks on RTI activists and also threats, false cases etc. even by government agencies. Since information sought under RTI is supposed to be publicly available information, if an RTI applicant in order to safegaurd himself from such deadly attacks, false cases etc. and also to protect his privacy(since no privacy law in India) does not put in his real name and address in application, what legal cases he may face?
Anonymous
23 June 2011 at 21:26
Learned Counsels,
What is the procedure to get the SLP against the order of Writ Appeal of HC posted before the constitution bench.
Is there any eligibility criteria for such posting in terms of question of law.
Can every matters which are res integra be posted before five judge bench.
Please enlighten.
Anonymous
22 June 2011 at 20:18
The Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 is still in force or repealed.
Merged States (Laws) Act, 1949 is still in force or repealed.
What does this laws says actually.
Anonymous
22 June 2011 at 11:12
Dear Sir,
I am a central govt employee. In a trivial dispute, court has issued summons u/s 323 IPC on the basis of complaint case filed with the court. The court has not directed any FIR but on the basis of pre summoning evidence recorded by the court issued the said summons. Whether Under the conduct rules of central govt., I am supposed to inform in this regard to my office. If yes, please inform about the said specific conduct rule.
Regards
Kanchan Soni
21 June 2011 at 16:53
hello sir / madam
are fundamental duties enforceable?
want to have detail on this topic.
please reply as early as possible.
thank you
Member (Account Deleted)
20 June 2011 at 14:15
hello experts,
i want your opinion on a topic. Pl give your valuable opinion on it........
--there should be a review system in constitution??
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Phone tapping Guidelines SC required.
Which section says that law enforcement agencies can tap phones for security reasons more than 72 hours without the permission of union home secretary or principal secretary (home) of state? What do u mean by inspector general rank officer? As this officer can give orders to do so.
But if they don’t get a nod form the top on the fourth day, they will have to destroy the call records within 48 hours of getting the response form the authority. But which authority? Which section says that they have to destroy the records within 48 hours if they don’t get the nod? Nod means the permission or approval?
Pls elaborate it & i have heard that there is a SC guidelines for taking the permission & each everything till destroying the call records SC has given the guidelines so can i have the guidelines.
Thanks