Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   13 July 2011 at 09:23

Journey

Sir,
Please let me know how the journey traveled in general compartment can be proven in court , as ticket is taken by railway ticket collector at the railway station.So What could be the way to prove journey of general compartment ?

AR

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 19:49

What is the usual fees of lawyers for drafting Supreme Court writ

Dear Experts,

What is the usual fees of advocates familiar with Constitutional law for drafting Supreme Court writ and appearing for case in Supreme Court? What would be the approximate rate for advocate who can appear in Supreme Court at lowest fees?

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 16:13

226 or 227

Any case law which will help me to understand in basic the difference between Artilce 226 & 227 of the Consitution of India, 1949

Or sir with kind help can u pls explain me

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 15:52

supreme court decision.

If the views of the Ssupreme court expressed in an earlier decision are explained in a subsequent decision of the supreme court, the explanantion in the subsequent decision will have to be followed by the high court, even if the subsequent decision is rendered by a smaller Bench of the supreme court.

Query: any example what does the above want to say .

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 15:37

full bench or consitutuional bench ?

1........ Single Bench
2.........Division Bench
3,5,7,9,11 & 13

in this which one is full bench & Consitutional bench can anybody tell me pls.

In High Court how many bench are there whether it may be orginial juridisction, criminal or civil in nature or appellate jurisdiction or writ matters .

Requesting the LD members to elaborate it if possible by the judgment give by the SC or the HC.

Thanks.

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 15:17

Division Bench reference not binding.

A Judgment delivered by a Division bench on a reference made by a single bench with the help of Chief Justice of the High Court, since such judgment would not be a judgment at all, and has no existence in law, becasue such a reference was tantamount to usurping the juridicrtion of the chief Justice.

The judgment delivered by the Division bench cannot be called as a binding precedent as it was a reference by a single bench to the division bench.

Help me & pls do support the answer with the case law.

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 11:49

Supreme Court citation

Dear Experts,

I am not able to recall the exact words of Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment. It was about the following of precedent in judgments. Supreme court had said that precendent cannot be the sole basis for judgments, because if a wrong precendent is already being followed by court in past, a wrong cannot be allowed by court to continue forever. Hence struck down about blindly following a precedent. If anyone could provide me that judgment/s.

Anonymous   12 July 2011 at 09:58

Removal from service

I have been removed from service after 24+ yrs after a departmental enquiry. The IA has reported that there was no evidence against me in the enquiry but the disciplinary authority differs and without further enquiry, summarily removed me from service.This is against principle of natural justice. Do I have a chance get redressal legally ?

Raja   12 July 2011 at 00:06

Applicability of RTI to Private Banks

How to get information from ICICI Bank within the purview of RTI act 2005 ?

joe   10 July 2011 at 18:47

Burden of Proof

While noting that child abuse is a horrendous crime, my queries are of academic interest.

The Goa Children's Act 2005 s 32(l) places the burden of proof on the accused. 'He' has to prove that he did not commit the crime.

The queries: (a)In the absence of DNA, trace element and video other evidence, How does the accused prove that he did not commit the crime? (b) Will this conviction not be considered 'unsafe' on appeal, IF there is NO supportive material evidence?

It is my view (as a person who deals with such cases) that a law which requires the accused to prove his innocence will eventually hamper the efforts to deal with the perpetrators of child abuse and land a few innocent persons behind bars