Namaste sir
1. My father purchased 1200 sqft DC converted site in the year 1997 at Bangalore North Kodigehalli
2. In 2003 the Khata document related to DC converted site was obtained from City municipal council
3. DC conversion meany Deputy Commissioner converts the agriculture land into Residential site for house constructions.
4. In 2005 My father executed gift deed in my name and plan saction with necessary permissions are obtained for Home construction
5. Within 2006 Feb House was constructed and occupied the house
6. Now still house is under meagre Home Loan
7. I heard news from my neighbours that earlier landlords are planning to file case gainst the house owners.
8. Our layout is fully developed with house constructions and hardly very very few vacant sites are left with no construction activities.
Our doubt is ;; Is it possible to file case againt the house owners at this juncture
Please advise
Regards
Hari
My wife got selected as teacher in group C post and joined on 28 July 2024 in the department.
I already have my ews certificate issued on 5 June 2024 for session 2024-2025 on the basis of income of financial year 2023-2024 , now she wants to apply for Group B teaching post. Can she still apply under ews category , as in the advertisement ews certificate for session 2024-2025 was asked to submit. Please clarify asap.
परिवार की संपत्तियो का पारिवारिक सदस्यो के मध्य कोई कानूनी बन्टवारा नही हुआ है क्या ऐसी स्थिति में भी कोई परिवार का सदस्य स्वयम के नाम से कोई संपत्ति क्रय कर सकता है और क्या वह अकेला स्वयम को क़ानून मान्य एकल मालिक मान सकता है यदि उत्तर सकारात्मक है तो ऐसा कब व किन परिस्थितियो में माना जायेगा ?
Neighbor is doing scrap business creating nuisance. Is the civil court (Sub Court/Munsiff Court) has jurisdiction to restrain the fellow from doing the scrap business in a plot wherein only residential permit is granted by the local authorities ? Any judgement to substantiate this ?
Sir
I would like to clarify some doubt regarding Women Rights under Hindu Succession Act .
Actually My Grandfather namely S. Perumal bought some property to the extent of 37.5 cent from each son, out of total 75 cents belongs to a family .
Originally the property was bought by E . Murugan & he has died in 1972 without written any will or settlement & he has leaving behind him , totally 3 daughters & 2 Sons ( Namely 1. Thiraviyam & 2. Sivan and his wife .
Thereafter S .Perumal has got the Sale deed on 26.11.1974 (Vide Doc No 2158/1974) from Thiraviyam to the extent of 37.5 Cents
& another one Sale deed in 1.6.1975 from Sivan to the extent of 37.5 Cents Both of them sold based on oral partition between family members and sold for family purposes.
In between the above Murugan's daughter namely Sornam & Lakshmi (After their marriage )Executed a sale deed in favour of Manikkam on 26.11.1974 (Vide Doc No 2160/1974) to the extent of 30 Cent mentioning that Legal heirs of Murugan and claim 2/5 share of total 75 Cents . ( The same portion of land has been already sold by her brother Thiraviyam & it has been clearly mentioned in the sale deed with exact boundaries)
i.e. They have claimed without considering her mother even she was alive at that time and also oral partition existing between their brothers as equal share of total property between the brothers ( male legal heirs only).
Now I want to challenge the right over the above property against Manikkam Since he has got the land by forgery sale deed on the following grounds
i.e. 1. Once again executed the sale deed even the same land was already sold ,
and
2. sale deed executed without considering oral partition between family members,
and
No right to females while the land was already orally partitioned and also married daughters have no right to claim the property ( Since they have married before 25.3.1989 )
1.Am I correct with the provisions of Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 1989) Act?
2.What will be possibility of winning chances of this case ? Mostly or 50:50?
I am Male 40 years Old. In An Major road accident My Father, Mother & My Married Sister along with their husband(My Jijaji) died.
Now only i have survived along with My wife and my Sister's two children aged 20 Years & 22 Years. My Father has self acquired Property in his name. So now who should be legal owner of My Father property? if no will is there.
1) Is it me only?
2) Or even My sister's children have stake in same?
Also want to inform My Father's Dad & Mother(MY Grandmother & Grandfather already died 10 years before accident) And My Father two Real brother.
1. I bought a property through an auction under the SARFAESI Act and received a sale certificate and possession. The Indian Bank, as the secured creditor, got an eviction order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Salem on 09/11/2021 to help you take physical possession of the property.
2. After taking possession,I did some repairs, updated the property records, and completed the necessary registrations.
3. On 23/01/2024, the original borrower forcibly entered the property, breaking the locks, and is currently occupying it. my belongings are still inside.
4. I filed a First Information Report (FIR) with the police, but they were uncooperative and delayed registering the FIR by 60 days, only doing so after you approached higher authorities. The court has now recognized the crimes committed by the borrower.
5. Ifiled a writ in the Madras High Court, which advised using Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act in the CJM court. However, some lawyers believe that since this section was already used by the secured creditor, I cannot use it again. I have also filed a civil suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act (SRA), which is yet to be heard.
6. The borrower's case is still pending in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), and he has been delaying the process with various applications. He has deposited some drafts into the loan account, but they couldn't be credited because the account was frozen. Now the amount is in a temporary account. The borrower is making claims about the reserve price and notice issues.
7. I am considering filing a contempt of court case in the CJM court, which had issued the eviction notice, due to the borrower's actions.
please advise thanks
Does below statement holds true .
"On partition the ancestral property comes into the hands of individual
persons/coparceners, then it has to be treated as a separate property and
such a person shall be entitled to dispose of the Coparcenery property
treating it to be his separate property."
I am staying at last house at lane of co op society wi 20 feet drive way. 2 neighbours are parking their car such a way that I can not drive in or drive out my car and everytime I have to call them to shift their car. In such matters what is the best way to do?
Reposting previous question liability of an advocate
Following post was posted here a while ago.I request you to revisit same and opine.....don't you think that advocate had violated rule 4 and 5 of guidelines of bar council by sending legal notice????.....Rule 4: Play Fair with the Other Side
Lawyers (advocates) must follow the law and keep things fair for everyone involved in a case. This means they can't do anything illegal or unethical against the other party. Examples include:
Making up fake evidence
Tampering with what witnesses say
Personally attacking the other side
Rule 5: Client Says Jump, You Say "Hold On..." (Sometimes)
Lawyers have to fight hard for their clients (zealous representation), but they also get to use their own judgment. This means a lawyer can refuse to:
Take a case they believe is based on lies
Use arguments or tactics they think are unfair Anonymous (Querist) 20 September 2011This query is : Resolved THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT DISPOSED OFF A CASE RELATING TO THE ORDER OF DRT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY A GURANTEER. IN THE ORDERDTD.09.08.2011 PASSED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE COUNSELS OF BOTH SIDE, THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH A DIRECTION TO BOTH SIDE TO APPEAR BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON 29.04.2011, ON WHICH DATE THE APPELATE TRIBUNAL SHALL FIX A DATE FOR FINAL HEARING OF THE APPEAL.IN THIS CONTEXT AND WHEN THE GURANTEER/ APPELLANT HAS NOT RECIEVED THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IS IT LEGAL ON THE PART OF THE BANK ADVOCATE TO SEND A LEGAL NOTICE ON16.08.2011 TO THE GURANTEER EVEN ASSUMING THAT, THE BANK HAD INSTRUCTED HIM TO DO SO SPECIALLY WHEN THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IS PASSED IN HIS PRESENCE. WHAT SHOULD BE THE LEGAL OBLIGATION OF THE ADVOCATE OF THE BANK IN SUCH A PECULIAR SITUATION?
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Legal-liability-of-an-advocate-while-sending-a-notice-231961.asp