KamalNayanSaxena
20 August 2008 at 00:31
A cheque, signed and delivered by a person as authorised signatory of a proprietorship firm.
proceeding U/S 138 NI Act, pending,
During proceeding the fact that actual proprietor is someone else, came into the knowledge of complainant.
Is it necessary to implead the actual proprietor as necessary party?
Anil
19 August 2008 at 13:10
A PRIVATE company has complied with all the provisions of the Companies Act except that it has not issued Share Certificates in physicall form to its share holders.
Which penal section applies in this situation and what is the penalty?
Rameshchandran
18 August 2008 at 17:59
Dear members of the Legal fraternity,
ours is a private limited company and the managing director is always in tour to foreign countries. He wanted to deligate
his power to sign in inspector of factories and such like files to General manager as the "Occupier". What procedure has to be done for that? NB: There are other two partner in the company who are also residing in foreign countries.
Whether he wanted to call for Director Board Meeting to get confermation of his decision. If not what is the procedure to be adopted?
Kindly reply to me immediately to enble me to render my duty as a legal assistant in our company.
thanking you
Rameshchandran
ankit gupta
17 August 2008 at 22:01
respected repliers,
what are the essentials required o form a company under indian companys act ???
Ashish
16 August 2008 at 22:18
As per Indian Societies Registration Act of 1860 a society can be formed with minimum 7 members to the MOA.
However, if the no. of members in the later years falls below 7 what are the consequences?
Please provide guidance in the above matter.
srikanth
16 August 2008 at 12:49
Can an auditor act as a liquidator of a company?
if yes what are the necessary procedures to be followed for appointing the auditor as liquidator
Manish Singh
13 August 2008 at 16:28
If a trust wishes to donate some goods out India, what kind of permission it needs to take from authorities?
Please throw some light.
N.K.Assumi
10 August 2008 at 18:42
Dear Sir,
can this documents in question amount to acknowledgement under section 18 of the LA or section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act?
1. i hereby acknowledge my liability of Rs... ...(blank) borrowed by me from you during...(blank)
2. i acknowledge and confirm for the purpose of section 18 of the limitation act of 1963............. till the said loan is fully repaid by me.
3. i further promise to pay the aforesaid sum within 20/110/2006 failing which you can take necessary action against me.
Sign by barrower
( Revenue stamp)
This documents was send by the plaintiff the creditor to the defendant the barrower and when it was signed and send by the barrower the plaintiff on the strength of the said document as one under section of the limitation act and filed suit against the Defendant.
The suit was barred and when they realized that the suit was barred under section 18 of the LA, they said that it was a fresh contract under section 25(3) of the Contract Act, can you agree to that line of reasoning? can you cite any court rulings on this issues?
N.K.Assumi.
v.viswanathan
08 August 2008 at 20:44
kindly let me know whether there any prohibitory claus or notifications relating to the partnership firms in the state of Tamil Nadu.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
company law
respected sir/ mam
what is neded too pen a company by guarantee and nat by capital.