Saai Murugan
02 February 2009 at 12:53
What are the necessary steps should be taken when starting a company
Company Type : Web Based (Services Oriented)
Please Advice!!
ashwin shah
01 February 2009 at 11:32
Few month back I have taken personal loan from City BAnk, emi were regularly paid. Due to sudden collapse of market my earnings were drastically reduced and I could not make payment of emis as agreed. I have contacted to bank and letter was given not deposit postdated blank security cheques given at the time of siginng agreement. Now that bank had deposited the said sequrity cheque andintiated legal proceedings that too out of jurisdiction area where transaction were never happend. Please guid me about the way and manner of giving rely. Is there any case law for determingin jurisdiction for filing case U/s.138 from Mumabi HC or Supreme court.
please do guide and oblige.
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
31 January 2009 at 18:22
MY CLIENT CONCERN IS A EXPORTER. IT HAS EXPORTED A SHIPMENT ON DOCUMENTS AGAINST PAYMENT METHOD. THE DELIVERY DOCMENTS ARE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE CONSIGNEE BANK. THE CONSIGNEE HAS TAKEN DELIVERY WITHOUT GETTING THE DOCUMENT FROM THE BANK. NOW THE CONSIGNEE DID NOT PAY THE CONSINGMENT AMOUNT. WHAT IS THE REDEDY TO GET THE AMOUNT AND TAKE PENAL ACTION AGAINST THE SHIPPING AGENT AND CONSIGNEE??
REKHA SHARMA
31 January 2009 at 14:03
My query is what will be the date of modification of charge where property already chrged to Bank sold to (Some part of the property)to another charge holder (Of the same property) under the OTS scheme after obtaing prior NOC in this connection from the aforesaid bank .
1 Date of sale deed
2 Date of NOC obtained from Bank earlier
3 Fresh NOC will be obtained from bank for filing form 8.
4 Date of NOC obtained regarding filing of Form 17 .
Reg
Rekha
AMMAYYA
31 January 2009 at 07:32
If the amount expressed in dishonoured cheque is more than the amount due to the lender(bank), can lender(banker) initiate legal action u/s 138 of NI Act ?
Selvam Perumal
30 January 2009 at 21:19
Dear Sir,
I require a kind clarification on the following issue:
A registered partnership firm dealing with “finance business” of mobilizing deposits from the general public and lending loans to the needed persons.
Now this partnership firm requires opening a current account in the nationalized bank for the purpose of depositing and clearance of Cheques being issued by the Courts in the execution proceedings.
But the Bank drag on the matter thereby hesitating to accord permission to open the current account by orally citing the following flimsy reasons:
(a) since the Bank and the said partnership firm have been dealing with same parallel business of “finance” as such the Bank is hesitating to accord sanction for opening the current account in the name of the partnership firm; and
(b) questioning the partnership firm that why not at the time of incorporation of the partnership firm itself a current account not opened;
Now my bonafide doubts are is there any provision of law which permits that nationalized banks to refuse to accord sanction to the partnership firm which deals with parallel business of the bank from opening current account in the name of the partnership firm?
Kindly clarify these issues with relevant provision of law and if possible with relevant citations, please.
s. ramesh
30 January 2009 at 10:39
What are the names of the parties and which courts have pronounced the judgment of the case reported in 2005 (1) RAJ 372 and another case reported in 2005 (1) RAJ 543 ?
vinod bansal
28 January 2009 at 21:00
Sir
when My friend operate his ATM & try to withdraw some amount by inserting his credir card in ATM machine,there appear a message on screen/display that ATM service is currently not available,thats why he collected his card from ATM machine & went his home next day when he again rushed at ATM machine for withdrawl he found that an amount of Rs. 20000/-was shown lesser than his actual balance there was showing a debit of Rs. 20000/- on previous date in fact not a single penny was withdrawn by my friend,now what is remady available to my friend as consumer forum has refused to entertain my complaint due to non-maintainability on this ground,bank has already refused to refund the amount,plz help me and provide citation on this deficiency of bank in regard operation of their faulty ATM machine .Thanks
BHAWNA
28 January 2009 at 15:44
Hi
I would like to know the when, how and for whom KYC is required.
Also is it just needed when foreign investor is an individual or is it also needed when foreign investor is a company.
Please advice
Thanks & Regards
Bharti
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Clause in Agreement
While vetting an agreement for services, the following clause appeared in it which reads:
The Parties further hereby waive any right to a trial by jury with respect to any lawsuit or judicial proceeding arising or relating to this Agreement.
How far is this clause acceptable?
What is jury here? Is it applicable in India