rohit suneja
29 June 2009 at 16:58
our company is unlisted company, we want to revalue the land & want to issue the bonus shares on that account . can we do that please reply supported with case laws & sections. also plz tell that are sebi guidelines are applicable on us.
Jayant
29 June 2009 at 12:46
Dear All,
Tow members (A and B) of the public ltd. company want to appoint Mr. X as a proxy.
can both member appoint a single person (Mr. X) as a proxy ) ??
Regards
Dathathreya Bhat G
28 June 2009 at 23:43
Dear Friends
Please clarify the following.
1) After the intestate death of partner in a firm how his share in the firm will be succeeded.
2) If the share transfers to the legal heirs and one of the legal heir dies leaving behind his widow and a minor child and subsequently said widow re-marries whether the said lady will succeed to the right of the said partner what about the right of the minor child.
3) If a legal heir of the partner dose not agree to settle the partnership dispute with other legal heirs then how to resolve the same.
Please guide me in the matter
Dathathreya Bhat
Nehal
27 June 2009 at 12:12
Dear Sir
Is there any limitation on using brackets in a name of a company to be incorporated in India?
Regards
Nehal
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:47
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:46
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:45
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:43
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
gaurav_the_great@hotmail.com
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
DRT
Hi All
Impleading application in the OA was dismissed by Register for non-maintainability. So i want to file a appeal to preciding officer of DRT. Please provide me that appeal draft. Its an urgent. Thanks in advance.. sanjeev desai