Surendra
10 September 2012 at 12:56
Fact:
A ltd has declared dividend of Rs. 1 on each equity share at AGM (26th July, 2012). Co has not paid dividend amount to its shareholders till now (i.e. 10th September, 2012) nor paid dividend distribution tax for said dividend.
Query:
1. Will company require filing form 5 INV with MCA.
Debasis Ghosal
09 September 2012 at 14:09
Dear Sir,
Can any one help me in providing any circular relating to the time limit of the bank to send confidential report of customers to the other bank who is intending to take over the facilities.
Member (Account Deleted)
08 September 2012 at 14:03
If a new Pvt. Ltd. Company is to be formed for manufacturing purpose,will it be necessary to fill the column for category and sub-category in form 1A?If so, how it is to be filled up?
Rao.T.N
08 September 2012 at 11:22
Dear Sir
what is the meaning of "without limiting the generality of the foregoing" and how far this word is leaglly valid ?
with thanks
Rao.T.N
syed niaz ahmed shah
08 September 2012 at 07:55
there is no agreement or any transfer of property to the firm , but ppropety shown in income tax returns nad balance sheet. the property purchased before the partnership was ever born in the name of three persons who are now partners of 2 more.
on dissolution the other partners are claiming it to be partnership property.
No credit has been given to the partners whose name is on the property in their capital or profit accrued.
The partners whose name exists on property are not agreeing to the property being partnership property.
No transfer of property has been done to the firm.
No value has been given to the partners.
it has been shown in fixed assets in balance sheet and not in capital a/c.
i need to know whether the property becomes partnership property. what are the safe guards the property owners have to take to protect their property from becoming partnership property.
a.manoharan
08 September 2012 at 02:58
Please discuss the Difference between Claim Petition and Plaint under CPC and their legal consequences ? After Claim Petition was ordered in another suit, for the same thing , can the suit be filed?
Dinesh
06 September 2012 at 21:36
does sec. 319 cr.p.c also applicable on complaint cases (on 138 negotiable instrument act cases).
can u guide me upon combine effect of 319 cr.p.c + 98 negotiable instrument act.
can we impled a new accused in case of 138 at the time of evidence without serve him legal notice ( which is not possible because of limitation)
Pradeep Panda
06 September 2012 at 16:28
Dear Experts,
I had availed a loan of Rs. 8,00,000 from a state bank of India and have executed an agricultural land and liquidable FDR for mortgage deed for security. Thereafter due to a riot in our kandhmal district, the regular transaction has not been made and the account was scheduled as NPA on 07-01-2010. Afterwards on 27.09.2010 bank issued a notice u/s 13(2) of Securitisation.....Act. After receiving notice, we requested them in written through regd. post to settle the a/c in OTS, but no reply from bank was made, how ever the reply should have been made within seven days as per rule (Securitisation.......Act) Further bank issued a letter u/s 13/4 of Securitisation.......Act on 29-01-2011asking for our co-operation to take possession of mortgaged property. Presently the bank has issued a possession notice under the same act with the information that the mortgage property has been taken possession by the bank. As far as my knowledge goes an agricultural land even if mortgage against a loan can not be taken possession by the bank under Securitisation.......Act.
Can I challenge before Banking Ombudsman or DRT?
Please guide me for above problem and suggest if there are any authorities to support this case. Thanking you all in anticipation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Lok sabha
Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs 06-September-2012 17:08 IST Violation of Accounting Principles The Government is aware that violation of accounting principles and financial irregularities are being carried out by various companies and their audit firms. During the last three years, 316 companies and 73 audit firms were found guilty of violation of accounting principles and other financial irregularities for non-compliance of disclosure norms. Prosecutions have been filed against such companies and audit firms, under section 211 and section 227 read with section 233 respectively of the Companies Act, 1956 for such violations. This information was given by Minister of State for Corporate Affairs Shri R.P.N. Singh in reply to a written question in the Lok Sabha today.