In Need of Help
09 December 2024 at 13:15
Greetings!
Our society has agreed to provide piece of land of the present society building.
MC agreed to it because as per them there is in recent times no norms of asking/providing bank guarantee.
How far is this correct?
Can this be protested. Can few members objection stop the process of Redevelopment
What happens even if a single member objects to this and demands Bank Guarantee.
What are steps to be taken in such case.
Thank you
Sincere Regards
Mike
Anonymous
28 November 2024 at 20:04
Amendment of application after death of injured applicant in MACT Case
Vijaya Bhaskar
27 November 2024 at 23:12
Dear Sirs
The Trust is constituted of seven trustees, three of whom are family members. There have been financial irregularities involving these three family members, including their failure to regularly attend board meetings. Currently, the four active trustees, who form the quorum, are considering amendments to the trust deed to address certain anomalies. However, the three reluctant trustees are not willing to attend the meetings or the registration process, nor are they likely to give a Power of Attorney. The agenda has been sent to them via registered AD, but they have not responded positively.
Given this situation, how can the remaining trustees proceed with the amendments? Can the four active trustees register the amendments without the presence or consent of the three reluctant trustees?
aryan Kumar
20 November 2024 at 21:27
Urgent please reply π π :- I have Bihar state obc certificate on which my caste is mention byahut kalwar because in state list bania :- kalwar(eraki), kalwar(kalal), (byahut kalwar)is there but in central list of Bihar state there is kalwar , kalal , kalar not byahut kalwar , as I know BYAHUT KALWAR and kalwar both are same byahut kalwar is sub caste of kalwar but still issuing authority is saying they will accept my application because on state certificate it's byahut kalwar and in central list it's kalwar, I request you all please give right suggestion what should I do , there are some ncbc advice pdf where it is mentioned that kalwar main caste include all sub caste but that is for the state of Odisha central list. Please reply asap whoever have expertise in this case
General Manager
20 November 2024 at 12:58
In which court, a case for malicious prosecution to be filed ? And under which sect6in BNS/IPC and BNSS/CrPC and Order / Rule in CPC ?
If it's in civil court, damages are reto be proved ? unlike in court ?
Kumar Soneta
19 November 2024 at 22:07
Hi, Recently I visited country club, Andheri, Mumbai. I met sales person Mr. Yousuf and he explained benefits of club membership which I didnt find attracted, later he explained about 7AC membership which will come along with country club at total cost of 37,000 for 10 years + AMC. That was attracting for me and I purchased same. After a weeks time I got to know all benefits explained for 7AC are false and I demanded for refund. They are not giving refund, I escalated issue to head office as well but no luck. Please help me here.
narendra khona
18 November 2024 at 06:11
Good Evening Sir,
My Query is that " A " gifted a portion of the Property to one to one of the his son's, " B ", & built boundary wall seprating the two properties.
Revenue officials made a mistake in calculating the area to be gifted & less area extent was calculated, & this error was unnoticed.
" A " passed away & " WILLED " the remaining property to his younger son " C ", Pookuvaruva was not done.
One year down the road " C " gifted a portion of the " WILLED " Property to his younger sister (Pookuvaruva was not done).
Latter down the road " C " too passed away, his wife & kid's inherited the property. A couple of year's latter the wife & kids did the Pookuvaruva.
The error comitted earlier by the then Revenue Official's was ignored, & " Pookuvaruva " was done for lesser area extent.
Latter down the road " B's " son found out this error that a portion of the Property is still in " A's " possession, who had passed away WILLED the remaining property to his younger son.
Can the Pookuvaruva done by " C's " wife be
" CANCELLED ", as Fraud was committed by them,( B is in possession of excess property, which reverted back to " A's " possession, who had WILLED the remaining property to his younger son " C "
Would Greatly Appreciate your views & input.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, :-) π π
narendra khona
18 November 2024 at 02:17
Good Evening Sir,
My Query is that " A " gifted a portion of his Property to one to one of the his son's, " B ", & built boundary wall Separating the two properties.
Revenue officials made a mistake in calculating the area to be gifted & less area extent was calculated, & this error was unnoticed.
" A " passed away & " WILLED " the remaining property to his younger son " C ", Pookuvaruva was not done.
One year down the road " C " gifted a portion of the " WILLED " Property to his younger sister (Pookuvaruva was not done).
Latter down the road " C " too passed away, his wife & kid's inherited the property. A couple of year's latter the wife & kids did the Pookuvaruva.
The error comitted earlier by the then Revenue Official's was ignored, & " Pookuvaruva " was done for lesser area extent.
Latter down the road " B's " son found out this error that a portion of the Property is still in " A's " possession, who had passed away WILLED the remaining property to his younger son.
Can the Pookuvaruva done by " C's " wife be
" CANCELLED ", as Fraud was committed by them,( B is in possession of excess property, which reverted back to " A's " possession, who had WILLED the remaining property to his younger son " C "
Would Greatly Appreciate your views & input.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, :-) π π
Isaac Gabriel
17 November 2024 at 17:43
The District Consumers Grievances redressal Commission issued warrant against the oppposite party for not complying with its order. But the Police is not executing thewarrant and dragging.Is there provision to lock the firm which refuses to execute the warrant or anyother alternative to punish the opposite party and pay the amount? How long the police can keep it without executing.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
30 day " rti 2005 act " rule to get reply from authorities
Sir,
Namaskaram, Would Greatly Appreciate this Reason for 30 DAY rule which is being Grossly Misused by the Officials, even if the Documents are Right in Front of them.
The reason they give is " It's OUR Right ", & at times they give you WRONG INFORMATION.
WHEN AN APPEAL IS GIVEN, THEY SEND YOU ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE, WHICH IS NEVER ENDING.
RTI MUST BE A DIFFERENT ORGANISATION, & NOT CONNECTED TO & UNDER DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT
IT'S THE SAME OFFICIAL'S MANNING THE DEPARTMENT. IN SHORT " POLICE BHI CHOR, CHOR BHI POLICE "
THANKS π
RESPECTFULLY,
NARENDRA KHONA