arijit
09 March 2011 at 13:06
Dear All,
Please help me out in this matter.
An e-form -32 of Companies (Central Government's) General Rules and Forms, 1956. w.r.t. resignation of a Director has been filed without his knowledge. His signature in the resignation letter is also forged. Now what sort of legal action can we take under different Cyber Crime Prevention Acts, Information Act, 2000 and further Amendment thereto against the parties who has digitally signed the forms.
Request for your comments at the earliest.
Thanking you in advance…
Anonymous
09 March 2011 at 12:14
what are licences to be obtained to open warehouse?
Pramod
09 March 2011 at 10:19
Sir,
I am working in Govt organisation from 5 years(Feb-2006) as JRF ( JRF is not the post on Estblishment)on Contract basis.The Contract basisOrder is for 12 month,6 month, 3 month after one day gap. Our selection on the basis of interview. In 2009 our Dept. has filled the regular post in which 30 JRF selected as field officer.The Qualification for the post field officer is any B.E. or M. Sc. Environment or its equivalant.
My Qualification is - Regular M.Sc. (Computer Sci.) in the year 2001 Which is acadamicaly equivalent to B.E. ( Comp.) certificate from the university is obtained.
I have not received call letter from dept for interview & not selected for the post field officer.
As i am working with organisation & Academically equivalent qualification i am not selected & remain as JRF on contract basis.
what will i do for to be regularised ? please give me advise.
Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 17:43
Mr Ranjit nad rani got married on 1/4/75 as per hindu rights and customs But Mrs ranjit approached to District court, aurangabad for divorce in 79 and obtained Decree, Ms. Rani remained unmarried. in jan 81 Mr. Ranjit came to know that Ms Rani gave birth to a female child named Ranjitha.
Some time later Mr. Ranjit got married to one Madhuri and was leaving a happy life with two children Bunty and Bubly
During Financial Year 06-07 Mr. Ranjit filed an income tax return where in he has shown a family property consisting of a resendital property where he is leacing noew and a commercial complex located at Nirala Bazar, Aurangabad worth 5 crores. this property was inherited form his father.
Ms. Ranjitha got maried to mr. yusuf who is medical doctor. Ms ranjitha sent a legal notice on jan 1 07 claiming a share in Hindu Family property in capacity of Daughter.
Mr Ranjit denied that Ms Ranjitha was born to him. The Family court aurangabad directed for the DNA test for both the parties. but mr ranjit refused to undergo the same. then family court held that mrs ranjitha is a legitimate daughter of Mr Ranjit.
Aggregieved by diposal order of the family court, Mr Ranjit challenged this order before Hon'ble High court of Bombay, Bench at aurangabad.
Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 17:40
Section-20-Rajasthan motor vehicles taxation act,1951
Interpretation of section-20 of the Rajasthan motor vehicles taxation act,1951.?
Whether a state can levy taxes for using certain bridges, roads, etc..?
In my view it is the sovereign function of the state to provide for better facilities etc. etc..
However the accepted view is that in order to maintain such bridges, roads etc. expenditure is incurred and to maintain the same levy of toll-tax is correct.
please clarify before 20-01-2010; 09:30am
Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 17:37
Criminal Law
As per the amendment in Section 202 of CR.P.C. Following insertion is made" and shall when accused is residing at a place beyond the are in which magistrate exercises his jurisdiction". Now as per this amendment Whether it is incumbent upon magistrate to compulsorily postpone the issue process or if a material before him is like such in a case when offence committed can be seen prima facie and accused is beyond the jurisdiction. Whether Magistrate can pass an order of issue process when he has satisfied primarily when accused is beyond the jurisdiction instead of sending it for investigation or the word shall denotes that he must send it for investigation. What is scope of words in the section "Sufficient Grounds"? Are there any case laws after the amendment of 2005 which says magistrate can pass an order of issue process directly instead of postponement of issue process, when magistrate is satisfied prima facie. Please send me the Object of said amendment of 2005 also.
Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 17:36
For more information and help visit www.airyourlegalqueries.com
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
I wnat to learn law
I wnat to learn law