Anonymous
07 April 2011 at 14:41
WHETHER ARC CAN DISALLOW THE APPLICATION U/S 27 OF DRC ON THE GROUND THE RENT FIRST IS NOT OFFERED TO THE LANDLORD. THE FACT THE LANDLORDS ARE NOT PRESENT BEFORE THE COURT DESPITE SEVERAL SUMMONS.
WHETHER THE ARC FULFILL PUBLIC NOTICE AND OTHER REQUIREMENT TO CALL THE LANDLORD SUMMONED THROUGH BW OR NBW AGAINST THE LANDLORD
mayank srivastava
07 April 2011 at 14:41
I used to take connection from Mr. Balbir Singh (Sales Executive) his mobile number is 9335076216.
one day i decided to surrender my one of postpaid number so i contacted reliance customer care, their executive told me that i have to submit written application to reliance. so i contacted Mr. Balbir, then after that i submitted my application n sim to Balbir after getting assurance from his side that he ll do further steps to surrender.
But Unfortunately he fooled me and he sold that sim to one of his other customer after taking some money coz the plan on my number was special SRP200. after few months i asked Balbir about that then he told me that he has not surendered the connection but he transfered the connection to another customer and he ll do the formal procedure for transfer of ownership.
My Fault was that i believed on him on good faith and i also surrendered my sim to him. After few months he resigned from Reliance and joined somewhere else and at the same time i got notice from reliance that my bill is due at around Rs. 1200 and i have to pay the same otherwise some legal actions may be taken against me.
So after this i called Balbir again and he suggested me to ignore the notice but i refused his suggestion and i asked him to give me the details of that customer and i shouted on him that u should pay this outstanding as i m not responsible for that. He said ok that he ll pay.But after that he is not picking my calls
But 3 days back i got a call from a lady from delhi and she told me that she is an advocate and i have to pay the bill now before 5 PM else she register a legal case against me.
I m so much worried now and i want resolution. Kindly help me. why should i pay Rs. 1200 as i have not used the connection thats why i have registered my complain in consumer court also and here for some help.
Today i got a call from relaince and the lady asked me all the details and she has no resolution about the problem rather she was blaiming me that it was my fault.
She asked me bout the proof of that request but i m not able to give proof as i believed on him on good faith that he ll do all the formalities and i had not taken any written proof or receiving of my application from him.
I told her that i can lodge a FIR against Mr. Balbir and i can submit that copy in relaince from my behalf so they believe that my case was genuine and it would work as a proof but she told me that it wouldn't work.
So i need some urgent help and resolution from you experts.
Waiting for some early n needful response
Thanks & Regards
Mayank Srivastava
Surrendred No. 9335287827
Ph. No. 9335363533
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 20:09
There is a provision that under MCS Act 1960 section 154 you can approach Divisional Joint Registrar for revision against Recovery certificate and any other action like auction of property etc.
In the present case application is made before Div. Jt. Registrar but the Registrar is on Leave and no charge has been given to any other official to dispose of the cases.
In such circumstance what is the remedy available for Borrower?
The suptd. is not ready to acknowledge the application nor ready to write anything or any comment.
In such case to stop the special Re. Officer from taking steps what action can be initiated by the borrower?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 17:22
Sir/Mam,
I m 2nd Year student of BBA LLB. My query is regarding my project topic:- Administration of Justice in Calcutta till 1726(Constitutional and legal history).
Actually,in this topic i m not getting sufficient material. so kindly help me and give some good material on this topic which can help me in my project and for presentation also.please reply as soon as possible.
Thankyou
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:47
Dear Sirs,
The following judgement copy urgently need
the case in madras highcourt.
Justie Samikannu awarded decision in the case of Vadalur konda Reddiar Vs Hindu Religious endowment Board that Vadalur Vallalar shrines
Case law
ple.send my email id saranaks@gmail.com
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:45
DOEACC Society prints the following condition at the backside of the marksheet
The application of review must reach to their office within one month from the date of printing of the result.
Now in a case I saw, the result was printed on 2nd day of a month and it was posted on 26th.
The question is:-
1. Are they totally free to post the result as per "go as you" process? Can they post it after 40 days of printing?
2. As per the terms and condition, the time will be taken from the date of printing, so if someone receives the result after one month then there is no chance of applying for review. Who will take the responsibility?
3. Can a student ask for the copy of answer sheet from DOEACC (or any exam-authority) through RTI Act? Is there any process to prove that the authority is not sincere in valuation of the exam? (where they make dealy to prevent review).
4. Can a candidate apply for review on the basis of the result published in internet? DOEACC publish the result in their website with a declaration that there is no guaranty of correctness of the result published in internet.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:42
I am appearing for the accused in a narcotic case and it is posted for final hearing.
Facts of the case is as follows :
Please guide me .
Offence u/s 20 (b) NDPS ACT.
ALLEGATION :-
Accused was found carrying 36 gms of ganja, in a plastic carry bag and he was arrested in a public place, on a casual search by the excice officials. ( no prior information).
Prosecution has examined 5 witnesses, and marked 6 documents.
Pw1 and pw4 - arresting officers
Pw2 and pw3- independent witnesses, ( not supported prosecution story ) but they were cross-examined by the prosecutor, without declaring hostile. is it permissible ?
Pw5 – investigation officer
Documents :-
P1 – seizure mahassr
P2 –arrest memo
P3-consent letter u/s 50 ndps by accused , to be searched by the arresting officers themselves( stating that there is no need of magistrate or gazette officers)
P4-occurance rport
P5-property list
P6-chemical analysis report
P7-inspection memo
M.O WAS NOT PRODUCED BEFORE THE COURT, NOR MARKED.
BUT, THE PROPERTY LIST SHOWS THAT IT WAS SENT TO THE COURT, AND THE COURT HAS RECEIVED IT ON THE SAME DAY…..WHETHER ACCUSED IS ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT IN THIS REGARD ?
Grounds, I believe worth noting are :-
NO M.O WAS MARKED
INDEPENDENT WITNESSES ARE NOT OF THE LOCALITY
INDEPENDENT WITNESSES, NOT SUPPORTED THE PROSECUTION STORY
NO ENDORCEMENT IN THE ARREST MEMO , THAT ARREST OF THE ACCUSED WAS INFORMED TO HIS RELATIVES, BUT IT IS THERE IN THE P7 INSPECTION MEMO
PW 1 AND 4 SAYS THAT THERE IS NO COLUMN IN P2 FOR THAT. THAT’S WHY A SPECIAL P7 WAS PREPARED. BUT, AS PER DK BASU V/S UNION OF INDIA, IS IT NOT MANDATORY, TO INCLUDE IT , IN THE ARREST MEMO , ITSELF ?
NO REPORT U/S 57 IS MARKED. BUT SIMPLY STATED IN THE MAHASSAR THAT AFTER COMPLYING SEC 57, PROPERTY AND MAHASSAR WERE SENT TO COURT. IS IT SUFFICIENT ?
NO FOREWARDING NOTE WAS MARKED.BUT, ANALYST REPORT IS MARKED . IS IT SUFFICIENT ?
I am told that in NDPS CASES, there a lot of citations that before conducting search of an accused. The arresting officers has to offer their personal search to the accused, to avoid implanting of contraband articles.please give me any one of such citations .
Accused has signed in p3 consent letter. But, but p2 arrest memo bears accused “s thumb impression , not signature ! its legal consequence ?
Is sec 50 mandatory in cases or consent letter from accused , while in custody is sufficient ?
Ref : 2002(2)KLT 211 (SC)
PLEASE GIVE MAXIMUM CITATIONS FOR THE ABOVE GROUNDS .
RESPECTFULLY,
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:26
certain retired employees of a corporation seek the enhanced ceiling limit of Rs 3.5 lac to Rs 10 lac as prescribed in the 6 pay commission . these employees are covered under central dearness allowance(CDA)
. some employees of the same corporation who are covered under induatrial deraness allowance(IDA) have been given the benefit of the above mentioned ceiling . it is said that for the IDA pattern no amendment is required in the Payment of Gratuity Act while for the CDA pattern an amendment is necessary. Correspondence was exchanged between the employees , the ministry and the PMO but in vain. Is there a case law to support the case of the CDA governred employees saying that the act of the corporation Article 14 of the Constitution of India ?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:24
Hello,
I need to know regarding the holidays that both public and private companies compulsorily need to afford to their employees as per law, and the consequences or other benefits such as double pay or compensatory pay in case they fail to give these leaves.
Also if you can through some light as to how many and which are the national holidays and are private employers and MNCs under obligation to provide the same?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Advertisement for recruitment by the comapny.
Sir. please let me know "Can you specify city/state where-from candidate should apply in the advertisement to be published for recruitment by the company", in as much what are the code of ethics for publishing advertisement for recruitment as per constitution of our country.