Avinash kumar seth
27 August 2009 at 10:42
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows
other information sought under RTI act 2005 i.e. her paper cancelled in the month of N ov. 2002 not in December 2002 her paper started SO grade exam on 27th May 2003 not in the month of 27th June 2003 her result declared on 11.12.2003 not in September 2003. in defence witness her office authority verify this information as per their office record.
Two cheques given to PW6 Mr. V.S. Chauhan one was Rs. 2000/- and another was Rs.5000/- one cheuqe she gave to accused wife Rs. 1100/- but in complaint she told that accused give the cheque and her wife cash the cheque in her account.
PW6 V S Chauhan complaint her in Ps IP Estate against Asha Arya (Complainant) he is on duty and she is on leave on that day on 9.3.2004 PS IP Estate police personal verified that complaint is pending with the PS.
case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
true copy attested
Sd/-
Mr. Chaman Bhandari, Sr. AO
o/o AG (Audit) Delhi
AGCR Building, IP Estate
NEW DELH
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
NewDelhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
now case is for final arguments on the above ground can i won the case or not?
monika
27 August 2009 at 08:17
can any one guide me that in which particular paper the posts for judges are bieng advertised any particular site pls help
R.Manivasagan
26 August 2009 at 22:22
Sir, we came to know that the Honb'le Supreme Court of India, has cinfimred the findings of the Honb'le High Court of Judicature at Madras that the Decree obtained without studiying S.S.L.C or +2 is not valid.
what about it's scope, whether it will affect the practising Advocate who comes in this categery.
there are 6 Advoactes in our Bar. pleased
A Truthseeker
26 August 2009 at 21:15
when a civil judge (junior division) or magistrate disposes a case the decision may be free from errors and uninfluenced if a bench with more than one judge is formed.
Vikram Chandra
26 August 2009 at 18:36
Hi Friends,
My Query is that; An Indian Muslim boy got married an Iranian girl who basically visited India for persuing her higher education for post graduation and her Visa from Iran to India is purely based on Student Visa. Meanwhile the Indian muslim boy and the Iranian girl got married and the student visa is being expired in the next month. After their marriage they obtained a Marriage certificate from the CEO wakf board.
Now, what will be the status of Mrs.Y, who basically is an Iranian Citizen and visited India on Student Visa and inview of her marriage with Indian Muslim boy? will she become and Indian automatically inview of the marriage as per muslim personal law and whether she needs extension of her Visa which is only granted in the capacity of Student or she needs to change her Visa type to dependant Visa from student visa as she married an Indian Muslim. What happens to her status of visa which is going to be expired in the next month. Can she be booked for contravention of foreign rules under the provisions of foreigners act or rules.
Inview of marriage she has become a spouse to Indian Muslim she needs to change her visa type from student visa to dependant Visa and should stay in India with her husband.
kindly guide me for the above issue.
regards.
k.k.jandial
26 August 2009 at 17:44
Hi Sirs,
My son booked a flat with a builder &deposited 5% margin money about a year back. Obligation of the builder was to assit in arraging 80% loan from banks with which it tied up,procure N.O.C. from a bank from which it took loan against the const. site, buid the flat and give its possession with in36 months. buider did not fulfill any of its obligation.& my son is in tocuch with the co. via e-mais and international calls being N. R.I.
My querry is that whether in the legal notice for refund of margin money to the builder ,all the e-mails may be re-produced or only passing reference may be given. Kindly advise and oblidge. thnk u all in advance,
K.K.Jandial
keyur
25 August 2009 at 21:23
my grandfather died without will
who was holding shares of listed companies
out of his family of 5 his wife,one son & one daughter died--
only two daughter`s are alive,
out of the died person grandmother & aunty died without will ,but uncle has made a will stating all the properties & shares should go to both the sister`s
looking to the case kindly guilde for trasmission of shares?how to trasmitt shares in the name of two sister`s
Hrishikesh Dhawale
25 August 2009 at 20:38
If a hindu female has acquired property by way of gift from her husband(deceased)
& if she died intestate without having any issue then how is her property distributed
among her heirs. Is there any difference in distribution because of she recieved the property as a gift?
present heirs
Her husband's brother's 3 grandsons, 4 granddaughters, (1 deceased grandson's widow + 1 son + 2 daughters).
Thanks & regards
Hrishikesh Dhawale
nitin vaidya
25 August 2009 at 17:09
i am residing in sociey where garge is attached to my wall owner of the grage is memeber and also builder
can he sale the garage to the outsider
who is not a member
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
M.V.Act
Sir please help me.
I have confessed under some Sections of M.V.Act. The vehicle was seized by police under Section 207. The case now have been disposed of. My client is not the owner of vehicle. He has bought the vehicle only on a sale letter written in a stamp paper. Thus registered owner his another one.
I am requesting court to release the vehicle to my client. But honorable court is not accepting and is saying that vehicle can be released only to the registered owner. The registered owner is far from this locality and totally unable to reach the court. What should I do?