Section 23 of HSA 2005

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 10 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
Vide section 23 of HSA 2005 a married daughter, married prior to 2005 cannot claim her rights & /has no lein on the property as a coparencer.Pl clarify/amplify

Chandini

Follow Query

Report Abuse

M.Sheik Mohammed Ali (Expert) 10 May 2011
give full details of the query

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 10 May 2011
In view of the recinding of Section 23 of the earstwhile HSA 1986 by HSA 2005,are Married daughters,married prior to
22 June 1994 who are settled, not seperated nor divorsed claim Co-parcenary rights under Section 29 A,29B & 29 C of Hindu Succession (Maharashtra) Amendment Act or under Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005?

Could some legal pundits throw light on this issue with the exact interpretation of Section 29A, Section 29B and Section 29C and/or any with support of Caselaws substantiating/purpoting the class/categories of daughters entitled for the same.

Chandini

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 11 May 2011
sir.. its repeated query .. already an expert give some links to you.. bettr you may try it..

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries