Marking of docs (wife filed husband's true salary slip-photocopy)
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 01 June 2011
This query is : Resolved
How to get the docs marked towards plea of interim maint?
Matter is adj for arguments on it?
How do we do marking of evidence in such summary procedures?
I have recently started working as lawyer. I was a home maker.
I am not able to answer abrupt questions of the court. please help. There is already some prejudice against the wife as she was delaying the councelling initially.
I am handling a wife's case of divorce HMA, on husbands plea of divorce on cruelty and adultery.
Wife needed to file interim main aplication sec 24 and hence we did so.
All following filed on same day:
1)WS (without support affidavit, for time being)
2)List of docs+ docs: photocopy of marriage card, photos, hisband's sal slip etc
3)Motion of Int Maint + 4) Supporting Affidavit
5) Notice to produce original and latest salary slip and bank statement, and Notice to admit the fact that photocopy of husband's sal slip is correct and bank details etc, which is in the above list.
Court isn't giving any adjournments. Senior lawer is representing the husband.
and now court has kept the matter for framing and Arg on 'interim maint'. Husband has opposed the 'Int maint' on wife's adultery but has not denied notice to produce but rather in dubious manner.
Since int maint hearing happens without any exam-in-chief, How are we gong to bring husband's salary slip on record?
Court is neither making any order on 'notice to produce' nor 'willing to admit wife's documentary evidence of husband's earning'.
This is 'interim maint'. Cruelty or adultery isn't even framed yet in issues.
Tajobsindia
(Expert) 30 September 2012
This query is left open from last 1 year.
Is the author still interested in a reply from Experts ?
Guest
(Expert) 30 September 2012
Anonymous querist.
Tajobsindia
(Expert) 30 September 2012
In INTERNET there is nothing called as if one puts "Sita - Geeta NAME" it authentifies the QUERIEST and thus qualifies for a reply !
Also in legal opinion matters put in INTERNET a queriest PREFERS mostly ANONIMITY!
Guest
(Expert) 30 September 2012
Mr. Tajobs
You were free to reply anonymous queries. There would not have been no objection to anyone, had you replied the query instead of merely asking the anonymous querist, "author still interested in a reply from Experts?", which had no relevance with with the query of the queriest.
You are still free to reply the query. But, you have still not replied tyhe query if that was open.
