Fraud in property

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 06 May 2018 This query is : Resolved
The Supreme Court, after giving due weight to the objection of the widow, imposed a condition while granting bail to the accused directing him to incorporate an averment in the affidavit that he should not cause anything by which the widow or her children or her kith and kin will have any room for such fear. Though the Supreme Court has not considered specifically the right of adefacto complainant or the aggrieved in raising objection in a bail application, there is a clear indication that the Supreme Court heard the grievances of the widow, in a bail application.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

P. Venu (Expert) 07 May 2018
Who are A, B, C & D? Please don't post riddles.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 07 May 2018
oh..I am just not naming the individuals..It's a very serious situation. Infact, it's the best how i could explain..The builder has actually messed up to create fraud..pls help.
AND, I am the person C

Guest (Expert) 07 May 2018
There is no logic of ABCD.
If it is your own real problem and you know it is a very serious situation, I wonder, what was the your wisdom to ask for some charity advice on your casual description of the query, instead of discussing the case threadbare with some very experienced local lawyer.

Better consult some local lawyer to get appropriate help. Competence of A can be judged only after examination of case related documents.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 11 May 2018
You mean to say that the supreme court has not objected to the grant of bail even though there was an objection from your side for grant of bail?
Well you should be contended that at least you were given a relief instructing the accused to not to threaten you or disturb you .or cause any harm to you all.