Raj Kumar Makkad's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 44370

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

Col. Sudhir Nethan says : settlement of Provident Fund
I retired as a HOD Chemistry from a reputed Degree College of the Allahabad University in 1981. At the time of retirement, my Papers for Pension were not forwarded to the Director Of Higher Education, Govt. of U.P. till 10 years LATER.Also, my Provident Funds have not been cleared in full till today.It was only on my filing a Writ Petition with the High Court, Allahabad, U.P. that my Pension was settled by the High Court Ruling after 10 years. However, I was not awarded any Interest Payment for the delay in disbursement of the Funds. At the same time, my Provident Fund which had been partially disbursed at the time of Retirement, is yet to be fully paid out to me till today. What is the course of action that I should adopt at this belated stage to meet the ends of justic as I am already 90 years old now.

parveen jain says : Civil Rent control- general law
Are Two co-pliantiffs permitted to have their two different advocates in a single suit? The facts are that one of joint owners had filed the eviction petition under delhi rent control act against the tenant and other joint owner was made a performa respondent who later on transposed / impleaded as a co-plaintiff. Now whether these two plaintiffs can have two different advocate in the same suit? The imposed Plaintiff has adopted the same petition and has also submitted the affadavit for that. Releif claimed is same in the suit.Please answer this legal issue. if you are aware of any legal pronouncement in this regard please quote that also.

rajvinder singh says : pls solve my query
a suit was filed by plaintiff for of permanent injunction restraining the defendant to construct the roof/projection and decree was passed in his favour. the suit was against the father and his four sons.the father on appeared as defendant no.1 and others didnot appear before the court.now what happend the sons were not proceede exparte.the father was not the attorney of his sons.during the evidence of defendant the father died and the evidence of him was closed by order of court.then the decree was passed in favour of plaintiff. now we want to challenge the decree can it be challenged or we should file application to corect the proceeding u/s 153 pls reply

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799

ajay sethi
Queries Replied : 31529