Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More



Raj Kumar Makkad's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 44370

+ View Full Profile

    What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?
    Land laws, Matrimonial, Consumer, Land Revenue Related

    My area of expertise
    Civil, Service Matters, Industrial Law, Matrimonial, Consumer

    My experience in the area (years):
    I am legal adviser of various organizations and have experience of more than 20 years in the field of law practice

    Organizations I belong to:
    Union of India, Central Board of school Education New Delhi, Ch. Charan Singh Agriculture University, Hisar, Vaish Education Society, Vivekanand Education Society and various other organizations

    Publications or writing which has appeared :
    Times of India, Legal Chronicle, The Tribune

    Educational credentials:
    B. Com. LL.B.

    Award & Honors:
    State GS of Adhivakta Parishad,

  • Rajiv Kumar Agarwal says : New Rent/ Tenancy law
    'X' is a monthly tenant from the year 1944 in respect of non-residential premises in Sadar Bazar, Delhi. The rent at the commencement of the tenancy was Re */- per sft . I understand that The Rent Control Act in Delhi underwent changes recently. Old Tenancy Act has been repealed and the new Tenancy Act 1997(amended ***) was enacted. The new Act gives broader rights to the owner and rent can be raised to suit current market price of property. Do you undertake such cases.

  • Rajiv Kumar Agarwal says : New Tenancy law
    'X' is a monthly tenant from the year 1944 in respect of non-residential premises in Sadar Bazar, Delhi. The rent at the commencement of the tenancy was Re */- per sft . I understand that The Rent Control Act in Delhi underwent changes recently. Old Tenancy Act has been repealed and the new Tenancy Act 1997(amended ***) was enacted. The new Act gives broader rights to the owner and rent can be raised to suit current market price of property. Do you undertake such cases.

  • Nikhil says : Regarding National Security Act
    My cousin shathivel whose is A2 in this case has a Fibre fishing boat in pondicherry which is a union territory. His Friend's Devamani A3 and logeh Iyappan A4 adviced the driver kannan A1 to drop some people to srilanka.As shathivel the owner of the boat heard the news he screamed at kannan and did not allow the incident to happen and adviced the driver A1 to go to karaikal which is in east coast 200kms away from pondicherry.But while kannan reached kariakal with the boat the local police seized the boat and arrested the driver, and also arrested shativel A2 and put them under 402.They came out in conditional bail after 11 days in remand.But now the politicans and some of the higher official police people are scaring them that they are going to take this case to the collector and put them against bars under National Security Act and it seems there is no bail for it.What should be done?? thay are illiterate and dont know how to proceed.!!!Please do help by giving some advices!!!

  • anki says : regarding ex parte order
    hi this is ankita my husband has got ex parte divorce against me in that matter sumannce was serve to me but didnot appear to court as my husband misguided me i came to know about ex parte order after 3 monts then i have filed set aside aplication it was rejected by court u/s 123 of limitaion act now which step i can take against him n appeal can i get relif aginst his ex parte or i get relif against set aside aplication sir one morething is that in his reply to my set aside aplication he made contradictory statement in afidevit he write he mention he married on 1 may 2010 & he get sumannce on 5 may 2010 but as per documentary evidence that is as per marriage certificate he married on 19 may 2010 can i take any help of it in appeal or can i take any action against him sir i m working & he earns four time more than me he had not any responsbility can i get allemoney from him

  • SHIESTA007 says : wirt petition
    DURING THE PENDENCY OF WRIT PETITION, THE DEFENDENTS HAVE SOLD THE PROPERTY AND AGAIN THE PLAINTIFF HAS FILED A WRIT PETITION AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AND NEW PERSON WHO HAS PURCHASED THE PROPERTY DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE SUIT, FOR CANCELLATION OF THE FRADULENT INSTRUMENT( SALE DEED) DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE WRIT. IS THE PLAINTIFF CORRECT IN ASKING IN WP TO SET ASIDE THE FRADULENT INSTRUMENT WHICH WAS DONE DURING THE PENDENCY OF WRIT PETITION?

Comment Please

  

Other LCI Experts


Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799

ajay sethi
Queries Replied : 31529