"The flaw in the law"- Am I right?
Baskaran Kanakasabai
(Querist) 05 July 2010
This query is : Resolved
The Flaw in the Law- part 27
Justice Prevails at last:
The draft of The Land Titling Bill, 2010(Government of India) specifies:
CHAPTER – VIII
COMPULSORY INTIMATION TO THE LAND TITLING AUTHORITY
52. Compulsory intimation of land acquisition proceedings
It will be incumbent upon the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to intimate to the Authority, in the manner as may be prescribed, the fact of issue of a notification under section 4, sub-section 1 or a declaration under section 6, or passing of an award under section 15 of that Act in respect of any immovable property situated within the notified area and to obtain a certificate of its recording.
53. Compulsory intimation of Government transactions
All the transactions by the Government in respect of immovable properties within the notified area, including alienation, assignment, regularization of occupation, sale, grant or lease, shall be intimated to the Authority by the authorized official carrying out such transaction, in the manner as may be prescribed, and it shall be incumbent upon such official to obtain the certificate of recording.
That makes notification u/s 4(1), declaration u/s 6 and award u/s 15 of the LA Act, 1894 as compulsorily registrable.
Is it right to say atleast now that the flaw referred to in my presentation titled "The flaw in the law" is a flaw in deed?
End of part 27
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
(Expert) 05 July 2010
Dear Sir
Now the Govt has taken note of the problems in the process of Land Acquisition -
Now - One such Govt Transaction by Dipsoal/Sale of the Urban land Under Urban Land Cieling Act, by GO are being notified /intimated, to SRO, by marking a copy of the GO to the SRO and the same are being entered in the SRO Records .
wiht regards !
Baskaran Kanakasabai
(Querist) 06 July 2010
Thank you Sir,
Thank you very much for your participation in the discussions and queries reg. LA Act,1894.
