Guest
(Querist) 22 August 2010
This query is : Resolved
I filed a case under 138 NI Act, which was declined and the accused was given benefit of doubt in 2005.
The opponent filed a suit against me for Damages of RS.300000/-due to Malicious Prosecution.
In Cross,the opponent admitted that he has no documentary evidence to prove that he lost a business of Rs.300000/- and that too because of case filed by me.
What is the probable decision of this case as per your opinion ??
Can the opponent a separate criminal case against me at this point of time ?
s.subramanian
(Expert) 22 August 2010
Do not Worry. In cases of Malicious prosecution malice has to be proved by the plaintiff strictly. You had a dishonoured cheque with you and on that basis only you filed the case. You had a probable and reasonable cause for prosecuting him. Hence you have good chances of success.
Chanchal Nag Chowdhury
(Expert) 22 August 2010
Malicious prosecution is not assumed in every case where a private prosecution fails e.g.,for benefit of doubt. There is no law in India where one private citizen can be prevented from filing a criminal case against another. Whether he will succeed or not is a different matter altogether.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 22 August 2010
Rightly advised by the experts.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup