lawyers notice

raju (Querist) 06 February 2010 This query is : Resolved
DEAR SIR,
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT IF THERE IS A PROPERTY BASED DISPUTE [WHICH IS NOT IN THE COURT AS YET] AND ONE OF THE CO-OWNER OF SUCH PROPERTY SENDS A LAWYERS NOTICE REGARDING THE ISSUE TO THE OTHER SECOND CO-OWNER ,THEN IS IT NECESSARY FOR THE SECOND OWNER TO RESPOND TO THE LAWYERS NOTICE OR SHOULD HE WAIT FOR THE DISPUTE TO ENTER THE COURT FIRST..THANKS AND REGARDS,,,RAJESH

Follow Query

Report Abuse

R.R. KRISHNAA (Expert) 06 February 2010
It is better to send a reply notice.

Arvind Singh Chauhan (Expert) 06 February 2010
Notice should be replied, but it would be better to take help of a lawyer, lest your defence or loop holes not be disclosed in answer.

B K Raghavendra Rao (Expert) 06 February 2010
It is better to reply the notice. If not replied, it would give a wrong impression about you. However, be careful about your reply.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 06 February 2010
I go with Arvind.

N RAMESH. (Expert) 06 February 2010
I do agree with arvind

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries