Debt Recovery tribunal act
Sunil Pathak
(Querist) 19 November 2010
This query is : Resolved
If bank gives a false affidavit and gets judgement than what should be done.
Important points and how and why bank has done is explained in the file attached.
Hon'ble DRT, Jabalpur has given verdict in 2002 and stayed judgement in 2005 against a review application submitted in 2005.
In short it is explained in the link http://www.itimes.com/users/sunil.pathak/blog/Central-Bank-of-India-Loans-Finance-Minister-Business
And in details it is in attached file.
Sunil Pathak
Mb 94252 03272
Please see - I am trying to attach file but
it is not being attached.
Please give me the postal address to send it by post.
Sri Vijayan.A
(Expert) 20 November 2010
Yes, I tried to open what u have given.
But u have attached to some other news.
Pl. type the url address of the link/ site
here, it will work
Sunil Pathak
(Querist) 20 November 2010
Dear Sri Vijayan.A,
I am giving the facts as under and attaching a file for details also.
1. Mr. P. Methews, advance officer of phaphadih branch, Central Bank of India, Raipur had demanded a bribe of Rs 40000.00.
2. When this bribe was not paid, he started with holding returned DBP documents without collecting material from Railways / Transporters. The Mr. P. Methews, advance officer and branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma did not allow us also to collect material by refusing to give RR/MTR ( a part of DBP documents). The branch manager has confirmed that they will not give documents in writing in a meeting dated 21.08.1991.
3. These returned bills reached to the tune of Rs 55.00 lacs. The central office of the bank started enquiry against Mr. R.R.Sharma, Branch Manager as to why the material was not collected by branch when the documents were not given to the borrower.
(Mr. Manjunath, the present branch manager of phaphadih branch of the bank has recovered DBP bills documents worth Rs 23.71 lacs in October 2009 still lying in the branch. The list of these bills are given in the proposal dated 10.01.2010 submitted to bank.)
4. Afraid from the enquiry the branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer tried to start recovery proceedings for this amount Rs 55.00 lacs against me.
5. Central office of the bank did not permit to start legal action against me as it was not my fault.
6. Then Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer decided to misguide their central office to start recovery proceeding against me. Details of misguidance with documentary evidence in shape of correspondence copies between branch manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office is attached in details attached.
7. This misguidance was forwarded even to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh by central office of the bank, who was finance minister during that period. A letter from HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is also attached with documentary evidence that the bank misguided him in details. This letter is available at http://www.itimes.com/users/sunil.pathak/blog/Central-Bank-of-India-Loans-Finance-Minister-Business
8. Central Bank of India had given false affidavit and obtained judgment.
9. The present above bank officials including CMD of the bank is trying hard to hide these facts.
10. I have given eight applications under “Right to Information act 2005” against which the bank officials have given excuses to the extent that in an application when I asked the central office of the bank to inform me the reasons of furnishing wrong information to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in 1993 when he was HON”BLE Finance Minister, the bank replied that it is their “matter of commercial confidence”. Giving wrong information about me to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is their matter of commercial confidence.
11. I had then submitted a facts proposal dated 17.07.2009 and 10.01.2010 on request of the bank incorporating all these photocopies of correspondence between Branch Manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office proving above said facts that a false case has been made by the bank.
Instead of replying me and withdrawing all mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure and recovery proceedings still continuing mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure.
12. During my discussions with bank officials, they say that in bank even after knowing fully well no one including CMD has enough courage to admit these facts.
File with details attached here with.All copies of letters of the bank mentioned in details are available with me.
Sunil Pathak
Mb 09425203272
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 21 November 2010
Please not that bank has right to recover its dues.
Now for malafide action you can file actions civil in form of counter claim before DRT as well as criminal cases against all the concerned persons.
For false afadavit you must have evidence than you can file Perjury application before DRT.
Writing to PM and others will not help.
And just filing cases is no remedy you have to persue them which takes years and years and every stage you will get multiple advice.
Sunil Pathak
(Querist) 21 November 2010
Dear Sir,
This is what I am facing from last seventeen years.
I am asking for some advise by which I can make an application to the supreme court asking for relief.
Central Bank of India is public limited bank,a government owned bank, they know that they have made a mistake but no one including CMD has enough courage to rectify it.
