V V SATYANARAYANA
18 February 2009 at 18:05
Sirs,
I would like to know the difference between 'judicial custody' and 'police custody'. Shall be thankful if I am clarified in the matter.
Sultan Salauddin Khan
18 February 2009 at 11:42
can a Sd.E.M. issue a search warrant u/s 97 of CrPC against a child for his custody who is presently living with his mother in desertion. Kindly cite some judgements in this regard
Chetan
18 February 2009 at 09:51
I case is transferred before me by an Advocate.
Facts :- the Complainant sold his 3 Bonds Certificate to the Accused and the accused haded him 3 cheques of "Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha".
Subsequently those cheques were bounce and the complainant filed complaint u/s 138 against the accused. The first Advocate of the accused send reply to the notice of complainant that the "The said pat santstha falls u/s 22 of the Banking Regulation Act and therefore that pat santshta is not the bank and therefore does not issue the cheque they issue only the voucher and thus the voucher is not the Negotiable Instrument"
My query is that how to take discharge my client i.e. accused under above circumstance (if any pls. provide citation)
Ravi Arora
16 February 2009 at 22:26
Dear Friends
I need one Citation.
Offence of robbery and murder: - Circumstantial evidence, offence committed on 21st of January in a foggy and dark night. F.I.R. and Statements of witnesses do not state the source of light; there is no evidence to show that streetlights were burning and it is also not shown in NAKSHA NAZARI,
But later witness improves in the court that streetlights were burning and some more lights were burning
I need a good citation on this point because what I ve is not very good
Ravi Arora
16 February 2009 at 18:35
Dear Friends
I need one Citation.
Offence of robbery and murder: - Circumstantial evidence, offence committed on 21st of January in a foggy and dark night. F.I.R. and Statements of witnesses do not state the source of light; there is no evidence to show that streetlights were burning and it is also not shown in NAKSHA NAZARI,
But later witness improves in the court that streetlights were burning and some more lights were burning
I need a good citation on this point because what I ve is not very good
amit
15 February 2009 at 14:09
atul runs a firm having c&f of many companies & his father is a govt. servant getting a scale of 1st class. according to ledger of atul. mr.rajeev has to pay rs.2 lacs to atul according to ledger balance of mr.rajeev. after some time rajeev gave two cheques of rs.10,000/-to atul & fraudulently give a notice through his advocate making party to atul's father & second party to his atul's firm that you have not supplied me goods for which i have given u two cheques for rs.10,000/- each hence committed offence u/s 406 & 420.
here i want to ask this that can atul's father suit case of defamation on mr.rajeev? as atul's father is a govt servant & has no concern with business & what atul can do, because the cheques given in favour of atul's firm was in account of previous balance of mr.rajeev
Rekha.....
14 February 2009 at 18:46
Confusion over conclusive proof.
Hello! Respected Members of the Forum
Wud u please make me enlighten on this issue?. Why L.C (School Leaving Certificate) can not be called as a conclusive proof in a minor girl rape case? Please explain it exclusively as I found Hon’ble Judge’s explanation as well as Ld advocates arguments are not satisfactory to me in the Court proceedings.
V.G.Rao Advocate
14 February 2009 at 11:55
Hi all,
I am a complainant side advocate in 138 NI act case filed by me, I have examined complainant as pw-1, and subsequently he was cross examined by counsel for accused,now the matter is coming up for complainants side further evidence, while matter stood thus, the complainant died leaving behind his wife and two children who are still minors, now my question is whether his legal heirs can continue his case filed under sec 138 NI act, if yes under what provision of law i can seek leave of the court to bring LR's of complainants side on record, provide me information citing any case laws in support of my case.
P.Muthusamy
12 February 2009 at 17:06
My friend's brother X had some enmity with my friend Y regarding a property. The case regarding the propety is in the court. Once
X scolded Y's wife pretending that she had tresspassed his property which is under dipute.Y's wife complained to the police about this. The SI called X to the police station. But X didnt turned up. The matter was subjected to its natural end.
One week ago Mr.X left the town and during that time My frined while crossing the property building he had a terible electic shock when he touched the wall of the locked house situated in the propery.
At once he was taken to a near by clinic and after some time he complained about this at the police station. The S.I visited the spot and arranged with the E.B to disconnect the supply to the house.
At that time the SI told that he will take actiono againstX when he returns to the town.
Yesterday X returned to town and the SI called X to the station.But as usual he didnt bothered. But today he came to the police station and told to the SI that he is innocent and as he was out of station he has nothing to say about the incidence and he is totally unware of that.
However The SI received a statement from X that he has not commited any crime and he will not do in future also.
But My friend is totally disappinted with this and he feels as if justice is not done to him.
The SI has not attempted to see what Mr X has done in the locked house to give electric shock when any one touches.
In one or two days Mr X will return to the house. ( He is having another house in the town and he will use this house also frequenty)
My friend Y says that when X opens the house he will dismantle all the elctrical connections and will pretend as if the shock was due to some electrical leakage in the wire.
How to establish the truth and what action my friend must take. It seems that the SI is favouring Mr X for reasons unknown
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
meaning of INTERLOCUTORY
repected sir/madam,
This is sampoorna can any body pls tell me the meaning of INTERLOCUTORY,
what if the stage of the case in high court, if it is INTERLOCUTORY in the high court,
thanking you all