LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   11 September 2009 at 15:50

res judicata

whether res judicata apply in criminal proceeding also , if yes in which condition ,if not, why not pls confirm me most suitable wide commentry on this issueriven

Rishi Ahuja   11 September 2009 at 15:39

In connection with 156(3)

Respected sir,

After aruments, IO submitted the Status report in the court and NDOH is fixed 3/10/2009 for order. I would like to submit the written statement in response to the status report files as it is factully incorrect and baised. Kindly advice me how to file my WS
before the hon'ble court before the date of order.

with regardsriven

Avinash kumar seth   11 September 2009 at 13:24

u/s 385/384/354 IPC

If the complainant apology that he/she wrote the complaint in pressure of his/her husband/wife's pressure that the FIR lodged by him/her is false & fabricated than what can court do in this matter.riven

Avinash kumar seth   11 September 2009 at 13:22

u/s 340 Cr. Pc

Judgements/orders for punishment confinment to jail of the accused/respondents u/s 340 Cr. pc passed by Hon'ble SCI/High Courtsriven

Avinash kumar seth   11 September 2009 at 13:07

u/s 340 Cr. Pc

One who commit the fraud with the Hon"ble court as per judicial record (being a public minion
) he/she may be punished or not in the interest of justice when in furtherance he/she may be committed fraud with the Hon'Ble courtriven

Avinash kumar seth   11 September 2009 at 13:05

u.s 125 Cr. Pc

Those who will not make the payment u/s 125 Cr. Pc to the DH and he would be sent to jail by MM concerned whether he would be granted bail or not and what is any other remedy for grant of bail without making payment to DH, when the respondent is not in a position to make the payment.riven

sunitta   11 September 2009 at 00:26

IPC493

My ex wife ans i are both American citizen. after divorce we had friendly relation. however, during my surgery, she came to india along with me to help me out and to take care. we owned one property together which was supposed to settlle betwen us. she stayed with me for less than one year but not as husband and wife. I paid her money for share of the property. she signed non registered sale deed but it was notarized. she also signed power of attorney. but later on due to influence of her relative she cancel the power of attorney. Now she wants to proceed against me under IPC493 to prosecute me.she has moved out of house more than a year. My question is that we both us citizen, married out side of indin non hindu marriage. had divorce in In US, dose she has right to prosecute me just cause she help me during my illness? does Indian court has jurisdiction? secondly is there statutes of limitation applies to 493. I am looking forward to hear from a learned counsel.riven

vinod bansal   10 September 2009 at 22:09

Essential commodities Act bailable or nonb-bailable

R/Members
Plz tell me Essential commodities Act is bailable or nonb-bailable in Haryana presently as i have heard now as per latest amendment it is bailable now.Thanxriven

Shivasurya   10 September 2009 at 16:58

Negotiable Instruments Act

on 12-06-2002, the complainant trust entered a Memorandum of Understanding with one Ltd company, for becoming a franchisee of the said company. And as per the Memorandum of Understanding, the said company provided computers, 10 KVA UPS, Laser printers, Dot Matrix printers and net working products totally worth about Rs.12,00,000/- as fee for establishing College Network Lab to the complainant trust on receipt of Rs.12,00,000/- from the complainant trust for conducting Networking course to the college students of engineering college at the college campus. And according to the Memorandum of Understanding the complainant trust acted as franchisee of the said company for one year. At the time of entering the Memorandum of Understanding with complainant trust; the accused is not director of the company and only in the year 2003, he became one of the director of the said company and he is unaware about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust and the company.
He came to know about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust only in the year 2004 while seeing a copy of legal notice dated 27-01-2003, sent to the company and its erstwhile 4 directors when cleaning the office of company and he simply ignored it as it was not addressed to him. And in the month of March 2004, the secretary of the complainant trust, came to the office and informed that the company has liable to refund the balance franchisee fee of Rs.3,00,000/- out of Rs.12,00,000/- which was received by the company for giving franchisee to the complainant trust. And as the present director of the company he has to give the said amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. As he unaware about the Memorandum of Understanding entered between the complainant trust and the company, he requested the complainant to give time for verify the records for his claim regarding the MOU and assured him if the company has to repay any amount towards any liability to the complainant trust. But the complainant trust insisted him to give a cheque for Rs.3,00,000/- and promised him that he will return the said cheque, if the accused established that the company has no liability to the complainant trust in respect of the MOU. After perusal of records, the accused knew that the company is not liable to pay anything to the complainant trust and immediately sent a letter to the trust demanding return of the cheque, but the complainant trust presented the cheque and after dishonor filed case u/s.138 NI Act, only against the accused and in the complaint the complainant trust has not added the company and other directors as accused in that case. The accused is facing the trial. I need suitable citations to protect the innocent accused in that case
riven

Satya Mani Tiwari   10 September 2009 at 16:53

Malafied Complain filed by complainantU/s 156(3) Crpc

A complain with a malafied intention is filed aginst me which is prima facie false. The Megistrate who ordered to file the complain was personally approached, he said no revision can be made, although he adviced the same can be challanged in High court with application U/s 482. wht is the correct remedy. I am not intrested to go to high court as I am confident as it is a false complain the police will put FR other wise also but what is the proper permanent remedy this way any p[erson can play with your prestige & liberty as news paper publish on main page to defame you without any reason. Please advice.SATYA TIWARIriven