Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 14:26
Hi,
I have a 138 case running against me in a court in faridabad Sessions Court. I have never been able to appear personally there. It is for a sum of Rs. 9,00,000/-. The court had issued a non bailable warrant against me. I live in pune. THis was in October. My lawyer appered in person in October there. Next date is on 4th December. I have been asked to furnish a bail with a surety of somebody with property worth 12,00,000/-. CAN I GET THE NBW CANCELLED AT THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT. WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE. CAN I ALSO GET THE CASE TRANFERRED TO EITHER BOMBAY OR PUNE. PLEASE SUGGEST.
CHEQUE ISSUED FROM PUNE DEPOSITED IN FARIDABAD. CASE FILED IN FARIDABAD.
Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 13:38
what are the duties of police if somebody hit me slap and i call them. how can i force police to performed their duties.
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
17 November 2009 at 08:42
If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.
Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.
In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.
on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.
at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.
dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.
the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..
ON this the saller filed a suit in court.
Q1. can he has right?
2. what are the remedies for the buyer?
3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
17 November 2009 at 08:40
If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.
Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.
In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.
on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.
at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.
dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.
the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..
ON this the saller filed a suit in court.
Q1. can he has right?
2. what are the remedies for the buyer?
3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 22:32
WHAT IS THE TIME LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING A CASE FOR DEFAMATION ? IS THERE ANY EXCEPTION IF CASE IS FILED UNDER DEFAMATION AFTER THE EXPIRY OF THE TIME LIMITATION PERIOD ?
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 21:45
in family corut my sisted has lodge case and honarable cout has ordered that to my brother inlaw to give maintaince but he has has summited false address in affidavit we inform honarable cout under 340 but i also lodge private complain kindly send me ref or ruling whether privte case can be lodge on my brotherinlaw if yes then send me refrance
Rajneesh Madhok
16 November 2009 at 20:49
Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
I got this E-mail from Mrs. Madhumita Sadhukhan, the tale of a quack practicing in Delhi and claims himself a doctor from AIIMS and the details has been attached. There seems to be no one to listen to the pleadings of the wailing mother who had been looted by the quack and the police and medical council of India don’t take action on the said quack. I pray to the Indian Medical Association anti-quackery Cell to kindly take action and provide justice to the wailing mother.
When it has been proved that the doctor who specifies himself a doctor and is practicing and the police complaint has been lodged against this fraud doctor then why not the police department and medical department take action against him. It is a great set back to general public and secondly it causes harm to the patients and the public Medical code of Ethics has specifically mentioned that no doctor is allowed to practice and should not claim to show miracle in treatment But there is no check on this type of quacks. Why not the Delhi Medical Association doctors come forward when all the evidences are being put by Mrs. Madhumita.
Why the tale of this self proclaimed miracle-cure provider ends here and why our Government set such quacks free to cure the chronic patients from dreaded diseases.
When the mother demands action against the quack doctor, DMA the medical professionals and general public should come forward to help her in providing justice to her by putting pressure on the Govt. machinery to take action against the quack doctor. We should keep our fingers crossed in a hope that the common man does not fall prey to such type of quacks.
The tale is as under: --------------Rajneesh Madhok, B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2, Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Madhumita Sadhukhan
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
To: dirdhs@nic.in
Dear Rajnish,
I, Madhumita Sadhukhan resident of Dhanbad sending you all the documents of the fraud who claims himself to be a doctor of AIIMS and who treated my son, Indranil Sadhukhan wrongly who is a chronic kidney patient. My son was previously treated at CMC Vellore and was under dialysis.
Through one of our distant relative Mrs Ishani Banerjee R/O Kalkaji we came to know about this fraud doctor. He assured us that my son would soon recover. He stopped his dialysis and started giving medicines which resulted in worsening condition of my son.
After enquiry we came to know that there is no such doctor called Supriyo Mukherjee at AIIMS.
Finally, at the eleventh hour we rushed to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Delhi where after 8 days his condition became stabled.
We lodged an F.I.R against this fraud at Hari Nagar police station on 12/10/09 but no action has been taken till date. A criminal like him who is playing with the lives of critical patients should be immediately put behind the the bars.
Thanks for your kind cooperation and help. Hope our joint effort will deffinately save some more lives.
Thanking You
Madhumita Sadhukhan
Contact no : 09709023765
09661872818
NOTE : I am sending you all the scanned documents along with the photographs of the alleged fraud.
sneha
16 November 2009 at 15:13
Can Defamation case be quashed? If yes then how and on what grounds?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
criminal law and accountability
can anyone kindly help me relate some of the provisions of CrPC with accountability of the police system.