Anonymous
21 January 2010 at 12:02
a complaint filed against a partnership firm and one partner who was the signatory of the cheque.during the trial the said partner expired and out of two partners only one is remain. can i join the remaining partner as an accused? under which section? i've already applied to resummoning the firm b'cause the advocate on record has withdrawn his appearance for want of instruction.can i apply for issuance of summons against remaining partner to join him as representative of firm? plz. reply urgently and guide me. plz. also provide me relevant citation if any available.
thanks
Anki Reddy
21 January 2010 at 11:19
Dear Sir,
In April, 2007, ING Vysya Bank has sanctioned Rs. 70 lacks towards the Plot cum House construction on my property at the Servy no 1910, Rajeswari Layout, Kondapur, Hyderabad. Out of the sanctioned amount the ING Vysya Bank has released only Rs 29 lacks toward the PLOT of area 300 sq yards and stared collecting monthly interest on the released amount, they have collected the interest for 18 months. But later I came to know that the entire layout of 300 acres ((in which my PLOT is also exist)) has been submerged with some legal implications in the court ((understood that the legal case is been happening between the original land lards and Venture seller by then)).
However, The Govt Offices is not permitting to do construction in the entire layout in which my PLOT is also exists and hence I also could not do construction on my PLOT eventually I could not avail the rest of the balanced Loan amount of Rs. 41 lacks out of the original sanctioned Rs 70 lacks.
But ING Vysya Bank after collecting the interest for 18 months on the released amount suddenly they have started collecting EMI on the Total Loan Sanctioned amount of Rs 70 lacks via checks submitted by me at the time of Loan sanction (( by then one EMI on Rs 70 lacks was done)). Having known this I have stopped my check payments and requested ING Bank to collect the EMI for only released amount of Rs 29 lacks and also requested to reduce the interest rates from 12.5% to 9% because every banks has reduced the home loan interest to 8% in the present market situation. I might have requested ING Bank to reduce the interest part because I had been paying them at very high rate of interest.
Since then I have been personally attending the ING Vysya Bank at HimyatNagar, Hyderabad several time but their treatment and response is just not tolerable and they way the Bank people are acting on me is of quite indication that they have been Harassing me.
Yes!! as a customer I might have requested them to reduce the interest rate to 9% but the ING Bank people have misunderstood and started sending the Defaulter Notices to me saying that I have to pay the last 8 months EMI dues on Rs 70 lacks of sanctioned amount and the huge penalties of Rs.180000, all these changes were never told to me.
Instead of replying to my requisition letters…….they threaten me that they will sale the property if I do not pay the EMI on the sanctioned amount huge penalties by showing some laws and sections.
In the bottom line even today; I am wiling to pay the EMI on the released amount of Rs 29 lacks without any penalties which are not applicable to me. But some times I feel like a filing a CASE against ING People because for the last 8 months they are harassing me in face to face meetings and also via threatening letters.
An early response on my above request will be great help to me!!!
Thanks in advance.
Anki Reddy
90000 81513
Anki Reddy
21 January 2010 at 09:57
Dear Sir,
In April, 2007, ING Vysya Bank has sanctioned Rs. 70 lacks towards the Plot cum House construction on my property at the Servy no 1910, Rajeswari Layout, Kondapur, Hyderabad. Out of the sanctioned amount the ING Vysya Bank has released only Rs 29 lacks toward the PLOT of area 300 sq yards and stared collecting monthly interest on the released amount, they have collected the interest for 18 months. But later I came to know that the entire layout of 300 acres ((in which my PLOT is also exist)) has been submerged with some legal implications in the court ((understood that the legal case is been happening between the original land lards and Venture seller by then)).
However, The Govt Offices is not permitting to do construction in the entire layout in which my PLOT is also exists and hence I also could not do construction on my PLOT eventually I could not avail the rest of the balanced Loan amount of Rs. 41 lacks out of the original sanctioned Rs 70 lacks.
But ING Vysya Bank after collecting the interest for 18 months on the released amount suddenly they have started collecting EMI on the Total Loan Sanctioned amount of Rs 70 lacks via checks submitted by me at the time of Loan sanction (( by then one EMI on Rs 70 lacks was done)). Having known this I have stopped my check payments and requested ING Bank to collect the EMI for only released amount of Rs 29 lacks and also requested to reduce the interest rates from 12.5% to 9% because every banks has reduced the home loan interest to 8% in the present market situation. I might have requested ING Bank to reduce the interest part because I had been paying them at very high rate of interest.
Since then I have been personally attending the ING Vysya Bank at HimyatNagar, Hyderabad several time but their treatment and response is just not tolerable and they way the Bank people are acting on me is of quite indication that they have been Harassing me.
Yes!! as a customer I might have requested them to reduce the interest rate to 9% but the ING Bank people have misunderstood and started sending the Defaulter Notices to me saying that I have to pay the last 8 months EMI dues on Rs 70 lacks of sanctioned amount and the huge penalties of Rs.180000, all these changes were never told to me.
Instead of replying to my requisition letters…….they threaten me that they will sale the property if I do not pay the EMI on the sanctioned amount huge penalties by showing some laws and sections.
In the bottom line even today; I am wiling to pay the EMI on the released amount of Rs 29 lacks without any penalties which are not applicable to me. But some times I feel like a filing a CASE against ING People because for the last 8 months they are harassing me in face to face meetings and also via threatening letters.
An early response on my above request will be great help to me!!!
Thanks in advance.
Anki Reddy
90000 81513
Anonymous
21 January 2010 at 01:26
cant a single person be surity for amothtr co accused in a 498a case?
Milind Joshi
20 January 2010 at 23:20
After the famous Vishakha V/s State of Rajasthan certian guide lines were laid down and accordingly if there is a sexual harrassment at working place then the procedure is that there should be completed department enquiry. Are there any case laws wherein a person has been declared as chargeless of sexual harrassment and the High Court or Supreme Court has held it to be correctly conducted department enquiry and upheld the acquital? Please send me the case laws on this.
Arvind Singh Chauhan
20 January 2010 at 20:35
Sir,
In our state Revenue inspector ( Lekhpal) has been conferred with some police powers. One such revenue inspector lodged fake FIR, himself in his register, that "A" has misbehaved with him and disturbed him from performing official duty. Sir my question is that whether, one who himself is a victim of an offence can lodge FIR himself, who himself is registering authority?
Sir it is very urgent if there is any citation please help me.I have to defend the accused.
vijeta
20 January 2010 at 20:21
when a person is given life imprisonment does that mean that he is to be released after 14 years of imprisonment
gurcharn goyal
20 January 2010 at 20:00
can a female be a respondent under THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005. Under section 2(q) of the said act respondent is only a male.
And in the decision of gwalior bench
RCR Criminal 2007(4)930(M.P.)case namely Ajay Kant V.Smt.Alka Sharma it is decided that a respondent will be male. can you give me the Supreme court judgments in favor of Said citation.
gurcharn goyal
20 January 2010 at 19:57
can a female be a respondent under THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005. Under section 2(q) of the said act respondent is only a male.
And in the decision of gwalior bench
RCR Criminal 2007(4)930(M.P.)case namely Ajay Kant V.Smt.Alka Sharma it is decided that a respondent will be male. can you give me the judgments in favor of Said citation.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Distinguish between Govt.sevent and public servant
Distinguish between Govt.servent and Public servent. Kindly furnish any case studies (cases booked U/s 13(1)(e)of PC Act) discharged/quashed considering public servent as Govt.servent.