Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

P.S.Subbaraman   04 March 2010 at 19:10

Criminal law

Even when an accused gets an anticipatory bail from Sessions Court or High Court . The accused is asked to squat on the floor of the court for surrendering and released on bail after satisfying the Magistrate on sureties . Is the practice correct ?

Sumita   04 March 2010 at 11:23

punishment in cr.p.c.

respected all experts,
kindly give me ans this quary:
the provision of punishment has been described in Indian Penal Code but only one punishment is described in Cr.P.C.which one & related sec.?? this Q.has been asked in ADPO(UP.)exam -interview .

Anonymous   04 March 2010 at 00:55

Bail for IPC 409

My relative is charged with IPC 409. First he has tried for interim bail from High court which was rejected. Then he moved to Supreme Court for the same. SC also dismissed his plea.
Then he surrendered in CGM court. Currently he is in Juridical custody.
And trying for Bail from DJ Court.
Please advice if arrest stay petition rejected by SC can cause some problem in bail from DJ

Anonymous   03 March 2010 at 16:37

498A

Hi,

I am a residence of Mumbai and got married to a girl from hyderabad. it has been only 14 months for my marriage. my bitchy wife who has been staying with her parents from past 5 months due to pregnency has filed 498 and couple of case on me and my entire family. we were taken to nizamabad jail and now we are back on bail. However during our firts attendence when we left the court my inlaws and friends caught hold of me and they started beating me. They also manhandeled my mom and sis. Can some one please let us know what steps can be taken to avoid this in future. Also my wife is planning to claim maintenance on me, so please advice what to do in this case.

Thanks a million

Anonymous   03 March 2010 at 01:47

Dispense with personal appearance

Ld counsels,

I have a criminal case under trail. Can I get dispensation with personal appreance sicne my job requires travel.

Are there any onther reason of excuses for accused to be dispensed with persoan appearance.

Please clarify
Thanks.

Anonymous   02 March 2010 at 17:42

bail against section 420,465,467,468,471

hi, a known of mine is booked under above section for preparing fraud documents for visa application to different countries. he has two co accused shown as workers. 60 passports , forged stamps paper, computer etc are recovered from them.the big problem is the person is already sentenced to 3 years RI from lower court and was out on bail from session court.i know this time he had nothing much to do with this but this is immaterial. all the recovery is shown on him by the police.what is the fate of his bail from session court.
there are no public complaints on him. after how many days he should move his bail to the sessions.

Member (Account Deleted)   02 March 2010 at 17:36

offences under Arms Act are Bailable or Non bailable?

what is the interpretation of section 37 Arms Act. It's most humbly requested to all learned experts to please clarify this. Thanks.

Anonymous   02 March 2010 at 12:09

supreme court ki sight se nikali ruling manya hoti hai kya

you can post your reply in english, sir,, supreme court ya high court ki websight se nikale faisle yadi print nikalkar ya cd main jama kiye jave to kya court usko accept karegi, informasion and technology act main to email ki vaidhyata ka pravdhan hai, to kya apni hi adhikarik web side ke faisle print nikal kar court manya karegi

Anonymous   02 March 2010 at 00:28

Crpc section 97 ,98 & hindu Minority Guardianship Act se.6

case no 787 oF 1997
order 29.8.1997
case Ramesh V. Laxmi bai agenst Rulin latest
Crpc section 97 ,98 & hindu Minority Guardianship Act section.6 (a)
1997 to 2010
s.c of india latest casege name & case no. and jugment

Anonymous   01 March 2010 at 19:29

Is this Forgery?

Dear Sir/Madam,

One of my client's purchased Agricultural land in Raigad Dist. Maharashtra. Now, the land was purchased in 2006 in the name of my clients wife who is a backward class farmer from Rajapur Dist. Maharashtra.

However, while purchasing the land, obtaining the 7/12 from Rajapur had become difficult & hence they submitted a fake 7/12 in the name of the concerned partie's husband's name as Section 63 of The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 prohibits purchase of Agri Land by non farmers. On that basis, the land was duly transferred to my client's wife's name. Thereafter, my client managed to obtain genuine 7/12 from Rajapur Dist. in his wife's name.

However, now, in Feb, 2010 someone has decided to investigate into the matter (Under RTI Act) & my client fears that even though he now holds a genuine 7/12, the person who has sought information under RTI Act may try to invoke the IPC for Forgery of Documents (7/12 in this case) once he finds out about the same.

Now my concern is the following:

1) Can IPC (for forgery) be invoked in this case?

2) If yes, what would be the maximum sentence possible & what would be the likely punishment considering the facts of the case?

3) Can my client claim any defence as to non existence of ulterior motive or malice?

4) Are there any other remedies available to my client?

5) What would be the maximum punishment under the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; if any?

Thank You.