meenakshi chauhan
29 October 2010 at 23:58
I am not a lawyer so i dont understand much of legal language. so please correct me if i am wrong.
i read in one book that case cant be registered under IPC 467 if the complainant is not able to tell the name of the person who made or forged his signature. if case has to be registered against someone, then it should be well told that who signed/forged his signature.
please tell if i am right or wrong..
Thank you
ganesh
29 October 2010 at 23:40
whether a major son can claim maintenance from his father or even for his educational expenses whether he can claim. if so quote me some citations
Member (Account Deleted)
29 October 2010 at 22:32
dear sr,thanks for your kind advice,
my wife has filed case against me on 6 of may 2010,and after that i started absconding from gwalior,my rest of family members presented themselves in front of police except my mother maternal sister and bhabhi,among all i and my maternal sister had not got bail since our lawyer has applied for session court but denied so applied to high court and still pending and said that will be done after diwali,so i cant go to my parents and nor celebrate diwali,i am worried about recovery of things as i have heard and since i am yet to be arrested, do they go for recovery against my owned car,because only my car is on my name?that is called kurki
Anonymous
29 October 2010 at 21:19
Dear Sirs,
Please guide..
1..Can I carry notes to refer with details of complaint(a key document around which case is revolving) filed while I am in witness box? (during exam in chief & cross) I am a lady having no command over local language.
2. Can I request to mention important points when deposing when judge is dictating? Some times judge does not dictate key points.
Please guide...
Anonymous
29 October 2010 at 17:47
as the police report with respect to the invesigation u/s.156 is given as per s.173(2), then as per which section the police report is given when the investigation is u/s.202?
Sunil
29 October 2010 at 14:13
In 138 NI i had issue samans dt 21-07-2010 agaist accuse that court was givan me 29-10-2010 and now today i am attend date court is tell me police service report is not coming what action we will taken against court
sanjay
29 October 2010 at 13:37
hello sir,
this is from the NDPS act:
1. Possession of drugs is in itself an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). It does not matter whether the possession is for personal consumption or for any other purpose. The punishment depends upon the quantity of drugs he / she possesses. However, if he / she is charged with either possession of small quantities of drugs or with consumption of drugs and he voluntarily seeks to undergo medical treatment for de– addiction from a hospital or an institution maintained or recognized by the government or a local authority, he / she shall not be liable for prosecution. This immunity from prosecution may be withdrawn if he / she does not undergo the complete treatment for de–addiction.
and in one of the threads here, i learnt that posession of upto 1000gms of 'ganja' is considered 'small quantity' or 'personal' use.
My question is, In a country like India, where Ganja/cannabis/hemp has been used in both Ayurveda and in preparing Drinks and sweets like Bhang Thandai, Bhang sweets..why doesnt the Act have any special sections describing as to how such cases will be dealt with? Everyone knows that on festivals like holi and maha shivaratri bhang is consumed by people of all ages and also politicians (some i know).
Also, when i read an article like this : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health/For-Holi-and-health-theres-bhang/articleshow/5611390.cms
i wonder why the government allows Media to talk about controlled substances in a way as if its not an offence but it is a part of our 'INDIAN CULTURE"??? this is not just one case, Ganja is considered bad if its described from a narcotic point of view, but is accepted from a 'hindu'/ ayurvedic point of view.. why the bias?
sanjay
29 October 2010 at 13:33
hello sir,
this is from the NDPS act:
1. Possession of drugs is in itself an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). It does not matter whether the possession is for personal consumption or for any other purpose. The punishment depends upon the quantity of drugs he / she possesses. However, if he / she is charged with either possession of small quantities of drugs or with consumption of drugs and he voluntarily seeks to undergo medical treatment for de– addiction from a hospital or an institution maintained or recognized by the government or a local authority, he / she shall not be liable for prosecution. This immunity from prosecution may be withdrawn if he / she does not undergo the complete treatment for de–addiction.
and in one of the threads here, i learnt that posession of upto 1000gms of 'ganja' is considered 'small quantity' or 'personal' use.
My question is, In a country like India, where Ganja/cannabis/hemp has been used in both Ayurveda and in preparing Drinks and sweets like Bhang Thandai, Bhang sweets..why doesnt the Act have any special sections describing as to how such cases will be dealt with? Everyone knows that on festivals like holi and maha shivaratri bhang is consumed by people of all ages and also politicians (some i know).
Also, when i read an article like this : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health/For-Holi-and-health-theres-bhang/articleshow/5611390.cms
i wonder why the government allows Media to talk about controlled substances in a way as if its not an offence but it is a part of our 'INDIAN CULTURE"??? this is not just one case, Ganja is considered bad if its described from a narcotic point of view, but is accepted from a 'hindu'/ ayurvedic point of view.. why the bias?
Kebom Taso
29 October 2010 at 12:34
WHAT ARE THE SECTIONS UNDER IPC IN WHICH A PERSON ARRESTED HAS TO MOVE BAIL PETITION DIRECTLY TO DISTRICT OR HIGH COURT BUT NOT IN ANY MAGISTRATE COURT.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Locus standi in criminal writ petition
we are a 3rd party NGO working for a cause. The case is that we brought to the notice of the tahsildar of a crime being committed in his jurisdiction and he also filed a complaint with the local police station. The police filed B report and then we made a protest petition which was accepted and later was dismissed after the examination of witnesses. Now, we filed for criminal writ petition and the Judge says that we have no locus standi and the tahsildar only has the power to file the petition. Is there any citation which says that a NGO/3rd party can file a petition on behalf of the aggrieved person? thank u all for ur help.