kiran
21 November 2010 at 22:46
Hi All,
My passport is siezed in 498a case in year 2006.
Now my company wants me to go abroad for a period of 3 months.
One of my colleague told me I will need some sort of letter from my company that I am going abroad for project work.
Could you please tell me
1. What if my company does not give me such letter
2. What should be content of such letter.
3. How many days will it take to get my passport back
4. How much deposit will I be asked.
Please suggest me the ideal route to take back my passport.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
21 November 2010 at 22:38
Dear Ld Counsel,
1 When there is no provision of transit remand then how the court would handle such types of applications when the Substantive And Procedural Law not permit.?
2. There is no provision in Cr.P.c
Anonymous
21 November 2010 at 19:31
Dear Sir,
Cri.Case regd. no. 300335/2004 duly & validly terminated by 8th & 7 th C.J.J.D. & J.M.F.C., Civil court, Satara. While working the above petition, Civil Court, Satara, framed another petition bearing No. 200068/2006 & converted the same to 200005/2009 by Sr. div. court, satara. The party then shifted the petition to Zillah Nayalaya, Solapur, bearing no. 200088/2009 to Spl. Dkst, Sr.div. Court, Solapur. So I have gone through petitioner's details & the observations are as follows:-
The petitioner was having shivraj service station, 322/2/1, pune banglore road, MIDC, post kodoli, satara-415 004, a retail sales of petroleum products & ram ramesh traders, Satara, a liquor business. The petitioner is having total 79 petitions in the civil court, satara, with different residential affidavitted address proofs & most of the petitions are through some body else.
In the process, I have lodged a professional miscondut case against the petitioner's advocate bearing no. 17050/2008 before Secretary, bar council of maharashtra & goa, mumbai & procurred a letter from asst. secretary, bar council of india, new delhi, to take appropriate action against this advocate. The result of this is still awaited.
All this pettions raised a question of law?
pashi
21 November 2010 at 18:27
Can an accused request the court to give a photoscanned copy of the cheque during the trial of the case.
Brief history:In the year 2000 the accused had given a post dt cheque to the complainant filling up the date , amount & name of the payee.The accused had made the payment of entire loan borrowed from the complainant & requestd him to return the chq.The complainant falsely informed that they are misplaced & soon after tracing them he would return.On trust the accused did not followup.Now, after a lapse of 6 yrs the complainant altered the yr from 2000 as 2006 and presented to the bank & the chq got bounced.
Now the case is at the stage of cross examination of the accused.
My question is ,Can an accused request the court to give a photo scanned copy of the disputed chq to know the authenticity if the date before sending it to FSL.
The accused is sure that the chq is materially altered & it is possible to prove the alteration thro the microscope. PLEASE ENLIGHTEN.
Aashish Satpute.
21 November 2010 at 14:27
whether police is bound to give the information contained in case diary through the provisions of RTI,to the accused person?????
Anonymous
21 November 2010 at 13:18
A complaint case under section 323, 379, 504, 34(B) I.P.C filed by a villeger against so many named accused .Aligation made in complaint petition against a accused namely k.Sharma under section 379 that K.Sharma came and snached a gold chain . But in this case megistrate take cognizance uner sec. 323,504,34(B) I.P.C. and not take cognizance u/s 379 I.P.C but also take cognizance against accused K.Sharma. please help me that what step i take in favour of accused K.Sharma .Plz also provide me some case law for this type of case
Gurditt Singh Saini
21 November 2010 at 11:12
Sir,
In case where employer on one hand issues the cheque against salary and on other hand stopped the payment of this cheque, whether case is to be filed U/S 138 N.I.Act or complaint U/S 420 IPC, what would be better?
SATYANARAYANA K
21 November 2010 at 07:30
Complainant filed a case U/s 138 of NI Act, before the court, case is running, complainant died.
My quarries are
1. Now what will be the case position
2. Is legal heir come into existence or not
3. please mention with section of law or citations
waiting for your valuable replies
Anonymous
20 November 2010 at 22:31
whats the chances of bail being denied in case of old parents charged in a 498A case. The husband being the main accused was granted bail after arrest. Parents will need to take bail when the chargesheet is filed.
The opposite side would definately oppose the bail as this is the main chance of harassing and seeking huge sums from the accused. It has been told to us by the Investigating officer that he visits the police station frequently and puts false applications that we have been harassing him and went to his house to throw acid on him and his daughter.
And also he visits the magistrate court and puts such complaints.
I am concerned that these things may result in my parents bail application being rejected. They are old and I do not want them to be arrested at the time of bail application.
Though I know it is discretionary power of the magistrate in such crimes to grant or refuse bail but the main accused is already out on regular bail.
Is any precaution we can take there is no way we can stop the other party from making such complaints in police station.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
f.i.r
Is it maintainable once cognigence has been taken in 420&406 IPC. matter negotiated between parties.again on same issue case was filed in C.J.M Court U/S 156 Cr.P.C