Anonymous
01 February 2011 at 20:02
A,B,C WERE FILED STAY APPLICATION AGAINST 1,2,3,4. IN CIVIL COURT.
BUT A,B MADE THE FORGED THUMB IMPRESSION OF C , ON ABOVE SAID STAY APPLICATION.
C STATED BEFORE THE CIVIL COURT THAT I NEVER FILED STAY APPLICATION NOR MADE THUMB IMPRESSION ON ANY PLAINT. FURTHER STATED THAT NO ANY KIND OF INTREST WITH THIS APPLICATION.
ON THE BASES OF STATEMENT OF C, 1 MOVED AN APPLICATION IN WRITTING AGAINST A & B u/s 340 CrPC.
ON THIS APPLICATION MAGISTRATE ISSUED THE NOTICE TO A,B. BOTH APPEARES THROUGH ADVOCATE BEFORE MAGISTRATE, THE CASE FIXED FOR REPLY OF APPLICATION u/s 340 CrPC. NOW PLZ TELL ME HOW THE PROCEEDING INTIATING AGAINST A,B. HOW I PROVE THIS CASE BEFORE MAGISTRATE.
Team
01 February 2011 at 19:18
Hello Sir/Madam,
I am a graduate student, In my friend circle we had a debate, on 'Cyber Law in India'. One of the arguments were that, watching porn videos through internet(sites) are punishable offence. Is it true or false.
YOGESHWAR.
01 February 2011 at 19:13
The complainant has filed affidavit and the liability is on a lease agreement.
When the complainant will prove lease agreement before cross or after cross.
Jagdish Rai Dora
01 February 2011 at 19:08
What documents are vald to prove non-liability of payment of dishonored cheque, issued as security?
Anonymous
01 February 2011 at 15:52
Respected sir,i am for the accused in the complaint u/s 138 of N I Act. my client and complaint were partners for the deal of purchase of one land. both have invested 4 lacks in that. thenafter due to not giving title and non payment of premiume for Non Agriculture of that land, the agreement to sale was forfited. after that my client had filed suit again the land owners, and in that suit karar daad was made and 3 mounth time was given by the owners of the land to my client. after that my client went to bombay for business purpose and all the responsiblity of land was given to the complainant. and that time my client has given one signed cheque to him for payment of transfer premiume for Non Agriculture of said land, But complainant had
presented in his own account. then cheque was returned due to unsufficient balance. complaint filed on ground that complainant and accused were partners and invested 4 lacks equally for the purchage of the said land. and after final satelment of the account complainant is liable to get that cheque amount. IN the cross examination complainant admited that no satelment of account was made between them. and also his name and date was written in his own handwriting, and also he admited that it is true that i am not liable to take cheque amount, nOW IN this case how to prove that there is no legal due on that cheque amount.?
PLEASE GIVE ME advice how to defend accused?
and please give me usefull citation if there is,.
MAHENDRA C. PARMAR,advocate
Syed Jawad Quader
01 February 2011 at 14:36
In a CR case commenced under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, is it possible for the Prosecution to recover the amount of the cheque before the commencement of trial in light of the the provisions of the CrPC and the 1881 Act?
Can the amount of the cheque be required to be paid up if the Accused seeks bail? If so, which provision allows this?
Anonymous
01 February 2011 at 12:37
One of my client gave Rs. 1.5 lacs cash to his friend as a loan in year 2006-07.No document regarding said loan was exrcuted between paries due to frindship.Thereafter lonee issued a cheque of Rs.1.5 lacs to my client.Said cheque was bounced.I filed a complaint on behlf of my client u/s 138 N.I. act. Now after concluding of evidence etc. case is fixed fir final arguments.I think that my client's case could be dismissed on account of non proving of giving of loan to accused.What are latest citations on this issue.Please do tell.
Anonymous
01 February 2011 at 12:07
Dear Sir,
What is the procedure of against order of imrisonment of Police Comissioner.
Smruti
Anonymous
01 February 2011 at 08:46
Respected sir,
sir if the property which is bought from the life long savings(PF & Gratuity) of the father can court take dicision even on that property.
Kind help
thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
A.P.Land Grabbing Act
Sirs, can police have power to regsiter case under section 3 and 4 of A.P.Land Grabbing Act, arrest the accused and send them for remand. Please give the procedure to be followed by police and others. pl give any citations or rules to be followed and enlighten on this act.