parshant
26 February 2011 at 21:59
a woman who file a domestic violence act case in the court, can she file a 498 ipc case against same repondent and same relief
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 18:50
Thankyou for ur prompt reply, if filing an Eviction Suit is the only solution, then in your opinion...how much time would such a suit take, to finally get back the possession of my property, back to me.
(Min - Max)....Based on the below mentioned facts?
Best Rgds.
YOU MAY SEND A LEGAL NOTICE TO THE SAID PERSON MENTIONING ALL FACTS AND ASK HIM THE VACATE THE SAID PREMICES AS HE IS A TRESSPASSER.THEN YOU MAY FILE A CIVIL SUIT FOR EVICTION OF SAID PERSON IN CIVIL COURT.GOOD LUCK.
Original Question:-
If a close relative of mine, rents out my self owned property to someone else,claiming himself to be the owner. Signing a legal Rent Agreement with that person,taking cash each month as rent.
But unfortunately a year later my relative expires and now the so called illegal tenant refuses to vacate the place before the end of the agreement,2yrs from now.
What all can I do now to recover my property back to me?
Thanks.
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 15:57
FIR Files U/S 304-B/511 & 498-A.I Wants to now that sec 113-A Or Sec 113-b of evidence Act Applied or not this case
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 14:12
If a close relative of mine, rents out my self owned property to someone else,claiming himself to be the owner. Signing a legal Rent Agreement with that person,taking cash each month as rent.
But unfortunately a year later my relative expires and now the so called illegal tenant refuses to vacate the place before the end of the agreement,2yrs from now.
What all can I do now to recover my property back to me?
Thanks.
Anup Gupta
26 February 2011 at 13:12
Dear Sir,
Actually I want to know if a Director (My Client) issued a Post Dated Cheque dt 20.10.2010 on 12.07.2010 on behalf of the Company as an authorized Signatory and due to some problem resigned from the Company on 17.09.2010 and his resignation was duly accepted by the Company. However, the Company has not filed form 32 for the same and on the MCA portal his name is still display as a Director. Further the said cheque dishonored on presentation. My Client received legal notice for commission of offence under section 138 of N I Act being a Director of the Company. It is relevant to mention here that the alleged cheque was signed by my client as an authorized signatory but before the date of Cheque resigned from the Company. Holder of the Cheque filed Complaint against the Company and all the Directors including my client.
Sir, My question whether my client is liable for commission of alleged offence and what remedy/defense available to protect my client.
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 11:00
Sir,
A case under sec 279/ 304A, I.P.C was registered in the year 2004. An application for plea bargaining on behalf of applicant / accused has been filed. Now the father of the deceased victim, has agreed to a certain amount for settlement. Please clarify the following points:-
(i) shall there be any punishment after settlement of the case under plea bargaining? If so, what would be the maximum quantum of punishment normally awarded by the court?
(ii) shall there be any legal repercussion such as affecting to serve in any govt. department, getting a passport/ visa etc. or affecting on pensionary benefits from the Government and other factors if any also?
(iii) After the settlement of the case under plea barging what is the court's procedure in closing the said case?
(iv) What are the important aspects should be taken into consideration by the applicant/ accused while the settling the case under plea bargain?
(iii)
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 09:59
please let me know the time to file a cheque bounce from the darte of bounce of the cheque.
The cheque was bounced on 23-02-2011.
Shall I send a notice to defaulter or not required.
if required than tell someone why is is required.
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 00:32
RESPECTED EXPERTS,
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ACCUSED IS REMANDED TO 3 DAYS POLICE CUSTODY BY FIRST CLASS JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND ON THE SAME DAY ACCUSED GET BAIL ORDER FROM ANOTHER FIRST CLASS JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ON MOVE OF BAIL PETITION BY ADVOCATE?????
THANKS'S
Anonymous
26 February 2011 at 00:03
RESPECTED EXPERTS,
Mr.A, a junior engineer in government department.
His senior authorities(Assistant Engineer, Executive Engineer,Chief Engineer) misappropriate the public money.And case is book under section 409/407/34 of IPC.
While investigation investigating authority arrest Mr.A(that is in Friday) though he is no where involve in offence.As the case book under serious nature Mr.A was denied bail by First Class Magistrate.
My queries are;
1-What is the legal remedies that is available to Mr. A under above circumstances??
2-Will Mr.A be suspended as from friday to monday his police custody will be more than 48 hours.(THOUGH HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MENTION CRIME).
PLIZ ADVICE WITH RELEVANT PROVISION OF LAW AND CITATION BY SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT.
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
help
Dear sir
it is a Dv case
If through reading it comes to know that applicant has herself cleared all her allegation that they are wrong
can respondent lawyer appeal for cross examination or for reading the main application of the applicant?
in such situation can a lawyer demand to dismis the case?from respondent side.
Or case will continue till last. as nothing is there in the main application of the applicant and nothing to clear or for argue.
what respondent lawyer should do in such situation?
kind suggestion
thank you in advance