Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
18 June 2011 at 19:40
Whether the provisions contained in sec.50 to 54-A OF CR.P.C. ARE MUTATIS MUTANDIS APPLICABLE to an arrest made by a Magistrate or ,in court under order of Magistrate concerned ?
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 19:37
Whether an accused, released on bail in a particular case, may arrested on the merely ground that another offence has been added to the list of offences. Or he/she will have to again apply for the bail for the offence in which he/she is again arrested. Or the bail granted to him earlier will be continue for the 2 arrested also?
So second time bail process to apply or the the first will be continue.
Case law urgent required.
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 19:34
What do u mean by Exhibition of a document's?
It is also applicable in criminal proceedings heard first time it is right. So it is applicable in HC also & also in supreme court.
If the documents are not exhibited than that documents has no importance during the prooceedings that documents are not called for the evidence or it will not considered as a evidence.
If there is CD or Pen drive than how to exhibit that ?
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 19:25
1) As a matter of law police can not even slap a person, this not under their authority. Case law required. So when can a police officer use third degree on the accused at what stage or is there any certiera to adopt the third degree.
2) Question: Is there any provision allowing police station in maintaining community service register?
Answer: If the complaint indicates a cognizable offence, a FIR should be registered by the officer-on-duty of the Police Station and investigation taken up; if the facts do not prima facie indicate commission of a cognizable offence, a complaint should be registered in the CSR (Community Service Register) and an enquiry taken up. its also called General dairy. It is also called DDR Daily Dairy Report.
Query: Which is applicable in state of maharashtra whether:
a) Community Service Register.
b) Daily Dairy Report.
c) General dairy.
If possible also tell me whether it has written or link of it.
Form point no.1 answer support the answer with the case law.
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
18 June 2011 at 19:19
Whether all the aspects of the fundamental right to have protection against arrest and detention as enshrined in Article 22 of Constitution of india are incorporated in cr.p.c. ?
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 17:32
Can any member suggest me good Criminal lawyer in Delhi for u/s 498A/406/34ipc. Kindly Advice.
Regards
Anantha Sowrya
18 June 2011 at 17:23
Dear Sir,
After filing a complaint @ my "X-W" parental jurisdiction about her about illegal marriage[secretly], i got a reply from the PS that it is civil dispute. Not satisfed with the reply given by the SHO, i went to the PS and had discussions with the IO/SHO, that how my complaint is a civil dispute when family law i.e (498a) is a Criminal dispute.
Then the IO/SHO told to file a complaint to the PS of respective jurisdction i.e where the marriage has been held, which is 5 kms far from my "X-W" residence.
My Question
- The complaint will be entertained by the PS?
if so, can i file it through Speed Post/Regd Post with AD, as such, i am from a different city.
- In my complaint should I request to book a case U/s 494 IPC
- The enclosures [exhibits i.e Secret Marriage Certificate, RCR filed copy, Copy filed in the AP High Court to set-aside the divorce petition [which is pending] with the complaint are mandatory to regiter the FIR.
Or
Can i submit the enclosures to the PS, after registeration of FIR, if needed be.
Please enlighten me.
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 15:53
FIR registered aganist 7 persons u/s419,420,465,467,468,471 of IPC & u/s 12 of Passports ACT 1967.A person main accused under judicial custody who has same name Satnam singh(imaginary name) of terrorist & he by personation made fake documets which are compulsory for making passport and applied passport of terrorist `s wife,two sons by stateting that his own wife & sons .I am going to appear a person who verified Satnam Singh .This person is NAMBARDAR of Satnam singh ` village,& he is 68 years old & patient of sugar.He just verifired Satnam Singh who is living in his village & has no any criminal record but Satnam singh by fraud made documents of Satnam singh who is terrorist `s wife & sons.Satnam Singh terrorist living in German wid his wife & sons.These passports made in the year 2008 after passports made he also sent them in German.but the person who verified it was unaware of all this,in police verification for passport he verified satnam singh.now we are going to file anticipatory bail for person who verified ie NAMBARDAR,I need your kind help which arguments are best for our favor & i need judgements for my case.This case is high profile case in our town,could Session Judge grant bail?I need ur urgent & kind help.
Thanking YOu
Anonymous
18 June 2011 at 15:43
Meaning of body warrant under crpc?
[[[[[[[[[As per N.D.P.S act, any accused is at liberty to get his/her search from a gazzated officer,but he/she gives his/her consent regarding search from non-gazzated officer,then involvement of gazzated officer is not required. ]]]]]]]]
what does the bracket para say actually?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cognizance
There is litigation between two firms.One based on Mumbai & the other Chadigarh Punjab.Firm A has filed a suit of rendition of account in a civil court at Mumbai on the basis of a cheque issued by Firm B from Chandigarh.Firm B has denied the amount shown in the cheque & allege forgery.A criminal complaint is filed before JMFC at Chandigarh u/ss.406,420,467...IPC but the Magistrate has raised a query that 'cognizance cannot be taken under section 196(c) Cr.P.C as the cheque is a part of proceedings before a civil court.
Kindly suggest with reference to settled law/judgments.
Regard !